38 pages • 1-hour read
Sigmund FreudA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Freud argues that psychoanalysis needs to focus on the role of the ego because previous psychological research focused excessively on the difference between the conscious, unconscious, and the repressed. He advocates the study of how the unconscious becomes conscious. To better understand this process, Freud describes a complex and dynamic topography of mental life.
First, Freud argues that preconscious ideas are connected to language, and especially to oral language. Language contains the “residue” of conscious ideas once held and can easily be recalled into the consciousness through “memory-traces.” (Freud argues that visual language is often more closely tied to unconscious thought.) The role of psychoanalysis, therefore, is to connect the unconscious to the preconscious through language.
It is easy to understand how the ego relates to external perceptions; it takes sensory information in as conscious ideas. However, the ego’s relationship to internal perceptions and processes is more complex. Freud notes that internal perceptions of pleasure or displeasure are “more primordial, more elementary, than perceptions arising externally” (12). Unpleasant sensations create an impulse for change, pleasant sensations create an impulse for “discharge,” or relief. Unpleasant sensations heighten mental energy (“energetic cathexis”); pleasant ones lower it.
Drawing from his clinical experience, Freud argues that the “pleasure-unpleasure series” (12) of mental processes create compulsions without the ego being aware of it. If these compulsions reach the preconscious system, they can enter into consciousness. If they do not, they are unconscious. Through thought and language, these unconscious internal thoughts can be perceived as if they were external stimuli and therefore pass into consciousness.
Freud summarizes the work of German physician Georg Groddeck who argued that the ego is “essentially passive.” It is at the mercy of “unknown and uncontrollable forces” (13). Freud terms these forces the “id.”
Freud then creates a diagram depicting the topography of the psyche that incorporates all of the above-discussed facets: consciousness and perception on the surface, preconsciousness just underneath. Underneath that is the ego, which in its lower portion is merged with the id. The ego is only cut off from the id by repression. The ego can also take in auditory information. The ego is effectively the part of the id that has been shaped by the influence of the consciousness, and it seeks to “substitute the reality principle for the pleasure principle” in the id (14). That is, the ego attempts to reign in or guide the id, as a rider attempts to reign in or guide a horse. The ego also functions as a mental projection of the body itself.
Freud argues that it is not accurate to say that “lower passions” (e.g. lust) reside solely in the unconscious nor that higher mental functions (e.g. mathematical ability) reside solely in the ego. For instance, one might sleep on a difficult math problem, allowing the unconscious to work, and wake up with a solution. Further, guilt, which is driven by high mental function, is often unconscious. Freud states that this “unconscious sense of guilt” (17) is often the source of mental pathologies and resistance to analysis.
In Part 2 of the essay, Freud lays out his theory of the topography of the psyche and the dynamics between the component parts. Much of this part of the essay contains arguments that Freud had already developed in his previous works such as Beyond the Pleasure Principle and The Interpretation of Dreams. This review of previous work provides a foundation for the exploration he undertakes in the later parts of the essay, which incorporate his hypotheses about the super-ego and its relationship to the key drives, here translated as “instincts,” the life instinct (or Eros) and the death drive. This foundation is essential to Freud’s later exploration of The Interplay of the Life and Death Instincts.
In laying this foundation, Freud relies heavily on the language of topography to conceptualize the psyche. Topography is the study of geometric objects and their spatial relationships. Freud here conceptualizes the psyche as a metaphorical geometric object, allowing readers to visualize what are fundamentally intangible concepts. In his diagram and description of the topography of the psyche, he asserts that, “the ego does not completely envelop the id, but only does so to the extent to which the system Pcpt. [perception] forms its [the ego’s] surface” (14). The diagram that appears in The Ego and the Id is one of several similar diagrams that appear in Freud’s work, all with slight differences. It is critical to recognize that Freud’s use of topographical language here is strictly metaphorical. The diagram and Freud’s theory in general does not describe the literal physical structures of the brain, as one would find in localization theory, i.e. the idea that different parts of the brain control different mental processes. Ironically, Freud relies entirely on non-material explanations for mental processes even while using the physical metaphors of topography and thermodynamics to describe the workings of the mind. This failure to account for the brain as a physical organ sets Freud apart from many of his contemporaries and from psychological researchers today. His tendency to regard the mind as separate from the brain explains some of the more controversial statements in the essay, such as the assertion that epilepsy is caused by tensions of psychical energy that can be dispelled through talk therapy or analysis.
Another key simile that appears in this part of the essay is Freud’s description of The Conflict Between Ego and Id as being like the relationship between a rider and his horse. He notes that the ego is “like a man on horseback, who has to hold in check the superior strength of the horse […] often a rider, if he is not to be parted from his horse, is obliged to guide it where it wants to go” (15). This oft-cited analogy illustrates the compromised position from which the ego navigates the world. Though the ego is the primarily conscious part of the psyche—what we think of as the self—it is never fully in control and can guide the id only with the id’s cooperation. When the id desires an unattainable or socially unacceptable object, the ego can direct it elsewhere only by offering a compelling substitute for the original object. For Freud, this power differential explains the id’s influence on the developing psyche, laying the groundwork for subsequent sections.



Unlock all 38 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.