The Ever King

L. J. Andrews

53 pages 1-hour read

L. J. Andrews

The Ever King

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2023

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Symbols & Motifs

The Serpent

Content Warning: This section of the guide contains references to abuse and violence.


The serpent is a motif that loosely supports the overarching themes of Breaking Cycles of Violence and The Tension between Tyranny and Compassionate Leadership. Throughout the narrative, the term “serpent” is a nickname that Livia uses for Erik in reference to the tale that she read to him when they were children. L.J. Andrews uses this nickname as the title of every chapter that is told from his perspective. Combined, the symbolic effect of the word positions Erik in the allegory of Livia’s tale as the menacingly nefarious antagonist who will either kill and devour her (per the original ending of the tale) or find a happily-ever-after future with her (per her revised version of the story). Although the nickname is initially used in a tone of disdain, it quickly and ironically evolves to reflect the growing intimacy between the two main characters. The serpent image also comes to represent the Ever ship and its history as the personal ship of the Ever kings. Made of gruesome but uniquely Ever-sourced materials, the ship is outwardly the visual representation of Erik’s stern and ruthless persona. Internally, however, the serpent-shaped ship reveals Erik’s leadership philosophies and sense of justice, reflecting his creation of an egalitarian environment in which women hold the same rights and duties as any other crew member and everyone is expected to pull their own weight—even a kidnapped individual like Livia.

The Songbird

The songbird is a motif that loosely supports the overarching themes of Breaking Cycles of Violence and The Tension between Tyranny and Compassionate Leadership. The word and image of the songbird are used as a nickname and referential symbol for Livia. According to the tale that she reads to Erik when they are children, the songbird is meant to play the role of an unsuspecting victim who is lured in by the serpent’s empty promises. This dynamic echoes the way that Livia falls prey to Erik’s deceit during their first encounter as adults. However, in the context of the tale’s revised iteration, the songbird becomes a symbol of stereotypical resistance and hope, given that Livia’s version of the tale rewards the bird with a happily-ever-after future after it trusts in the words of its natural predator, the serpent. Although the narrative’s conclusion signals additional challenges for Livia in her relationship with Erik, Andrews implies that the revised version of the songbird’s meaning will win out and that the protagonists will eventually reach a “happily-ever-after” conclusion. The image of the songbird also aligns with the swallow necklace that Livia gifted Erik when they were children. Although swallows are not known for their singing, this image nevertheless carries a similar meaning to the songbird: that Erik, too, will defy stereotypes, break free from the confines of his inherited station, and join Livia in proverbial flight toward a loving relationship. By association, therefore, the swallow represents the meaning of freedom and self-actualization, and Andrews implies that this is Erik’s ultimate goal, especially when he openly admits that he would “give up half [his] palace to get this [the swallow necklace] back [when it was stolen] (54)”—well before he even encounters Livia as an adult.

The Mark of the House of Kings

The Mark of the House of Kings is a repeating symbol in the narrative that loosely supports The Impact of Toxic Parental Relationships and the issues associated with Breaking Cycles of Violence. As the symbol of the royal household, the mark is an inherited and branded rite of passage that all male heirs to the Ever kingdom must endure. Through this image and tradition, the author illustrates the tenets of her underwater kingdom: that the ruler of the kingdom must be a man, that his rule must come at the cost of blood and pain, and that adherence to these conventions and traditions is non-negotiable.


However, when Narza’s uses the mark on the golden mantle that she gifts Thorvald, her action complicates this meaning. By making the mark a part of her “gift” to Thorvald, which Erik inherits, Narza implicitly embeds a loving relationship as a condition to the full, indisputable power of royals. Although the condition is seemingly only reserved to ensure her daughter’s (Erik’s mother’s) happiness with Thorvald, the new condition effectively restructures and breaks the requirements of the rule into a two-party system from that point forward—a dynamic that is highlighted when Livia sports the mark herself. Thus, royal power in Ever is no longer supported by one pillar alone but is instead balanced between two individuals. The mark therefore evolves in meaning, signifying change, stability in shared power and responsibilities, and a less cruel core to the royal house of Ever.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock the meaning behind every key symbol & motif

See how recurring imagery, objects, and ideas shape the narrative.

  • Explore how the author builds meaning through symbolism
  • Understand what symbols & motifs represent in the text
  • Connect recurring ideas to themes, characters, and events