The Ever King

L. J. Andrews

53 pages 1-hour read

L. J. Andrews

The Ever King

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2023

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Breaking Cycles of Violence

Content Warning: This section of the guide contains depictions of child abuse, imprisonment, parental neglect, abuse, torture, and murder.


As the first installment in a spinoff of the Broken Kingdom series, The Ever King rides the coattails of the historicized violence in L.J. Andrews’s previous works, most of which involves the brutal war between the earth fae and the sea fae. Much of this history characterizes the premise behind The Ever King’s plot and creates the tension between the two main protagonists. By recreating the effects of this history in The Ever King, Andrews demonstrates that the cyclical patterns of violence are easy to fall into and difficult to break. Erik’s vengeance plot against Livia’s father, Valen, stands as a prime example of this dynamic. Erik’s childhood was steeped in violence, and he admits to being “born into brutality” and harboring early “memories are of blood and death” (290). He also admits, “Thorvald was not what I would call a gentle father […] and his greatest fear was producing a gentle heir. He had his ways of seeing to it his fears were never realized” (290). This understated description hints at the violence and abuse that Erik endures, and this issue is further compounded by the death of his mother, the torture he experiences at the hands of earth fae clans, the contempt and subsequent death of his father, and the public humiliation and brutalization at the hands of his uncle. He even suffers the betrayals from his own people.


Thus, with this barrage of injustices, Andrews suggests that this relentless violence afflicted Erik with a “darkness” that arises from the corrupted love between his childhood self and his abusive father. She also implies that the violence he experienced was dehumanizing and senseless to the point of confusion. For most of the narrative, the adult Erik enacts his own version of justice, basing it on the same cruel brutality that his father once used to sow fear, as this behavior is what the Ever society expects from its king. However, by adopting his father’s methods, Erik also perpetuates the cycle of violence that Thorvald initiated, especially when he finds himself determined to seek retribution from the one man who sought to protect him from it all: Livia’s father. Despite the abuse that he endured as a child, Erik still adopts his father’s war because these violent goals are familiar, and he also sees them as the only means by which he can have any value in his father’s eyes. Notably, Livia criticizes Erik’s twisted, maladaptive need to please his deceased father, stating that when Valen caused Thorvald’s death, he “[u]nknowingly […] robbed a heartbroken boy of what he saw as more chances to please a cruel father” (313). Thus, the history of the Ever kingdoms is fraught with cyclical violence. In this context, Erik’s desire for revenge is revealed as his most tragic flaw, for it is furthered not because of a righteous cause but because a gentle child’s need for paternal approval has been funneled into baseless hatred, pain, and continued violence.

The Tension between Tyranny and Compassionate Leadership

Although Andrews often depicts Erik as a strong, ruthless, and brutal leader who enjoys pain, death, and bloodshed, she also implies that his style of leadership is a response to the deeply fraught circumstances of his upbringing and the expectations set forth by his forbears. In the Ever kingdom, kingship is equated with brutality. For example, when Livia publicly defends Erik, Fione admonishes her and explains, “No one holds up an Ever King. They are born to be brutal, unfeeling, and your presence has revealed our king is not. Some think Thorvald would’ve been better off leaving Erik in your world when he was taken as a child, then creating a new heir” (306). Her words make it clear that the Ever kingdom as a whole expects brutal leadership from their king and sees his penchant for violence and death as an assertion of power and strength. However, this understanding of kingship effectively dehumanizes Erik and prevents him from sharing his vulnerabilities with those around him—even his cousin and grandmother. Thus, traditional leadership in the Ever kingdom stifles any possibility of human responses and molds kings to be needlessly power-hungry, callous, and dismissive of human life.


However, the narrative also illustrates that Erik has risen above all the violence, pain, and betrayal that he has endured, for he retains a shred of his humanity and finds subversive ways to pursue a different form of leadership. Instead of embodying Ever’s traditional leadership style, Erik effectively uses it as a public persona to achieve secret altruistic endeavors. For example, in the Skondell incident, Erik upholds his crafted persona of the Ever king by publicly torturing and murdering Lucien for attacking the village, but he also remains true to his more private duty as a leader of the Ever kingdom. As he reveals in his conversation with Tait, “I know my people. […] From the first report of the darkening in Skondell, space was saved for the clan in the river cavers. […] What a foolish king I might’ve been if I’d not recalled [that the Skondell residents] needed darkness before sunset for their prayers” (169). This quote highlights Erik’s attentiveness to the needs of his people and also attests to his respect for their particularities and beliefs. Thus, although Erik might portray himself as a ruthless king, his leadership is based upon his genuine care for his people. His actions indicate his concern for their well-being, proving that unlike his father, he is not motivated by personal greed. Erik therefore exhibits a hybrid form of leadership; while the core of his actions has his people’s interest at heart, he adopts a brutal façade to strengthen his ability to surreptitiously help them and keep them safe.

The Impact of Toxic Parental Relationships

As Erik strives to take revenge against Valen and Livia uncovers Thorvald’s past abuses of his son, it is clear that the issue of fatherhood lies at the center of the conflicts in The Ever King. In fact, Andrews deliberately constructs her narrative to juxtapose Valen with Thorvald in order to highlight the impact of men who fail to find value in parenthood and seek instead only to use their family ties for personal gain. Ostensibly, Valen and Thorvald appear similar: Both are strong fae men who were at one time revered and feared by their people. They are both rulers of their respective kingdoms, and they both have a penchant for unbridled violence, with Thorvald’s signature brutality mirroring Valen’s cursed bloodlust.


Their core differences, however, lie in the treatment that they reserve for their families. For Thorvald, family members, such as his wife and heir, are expendable chess pieces who only serve the purpose of expanding or reinforcing his power. By contrast, Valen is a family man who values equality, partnership, love, and respect—principles that he has imparted to his children as well. As Livia comments, “I thought of my parents and how they confided in each other, depended on each other. They ruled together. When one bent under the weight of the crown, the other would take it for them both” (284). Andrews therefore uses Erik and Livia’s character traits to highlight the differences in Valen and Thorvald’s family values; whereas Erik is suspicious and distrustful but secretly seeks approval and love, Livia is empathetic and altruistic, and she freely offers her love and friendship.


Similarly, although Livia might experience self-doubt in some moments, Erik has lived with a crippled sense of his own self-worth, a deep inner wound that Andrews captures when Erik muses, “Mangled. I wouldn’t be foolish enough to think Livia would ever truly crave a touch from a man like me. I hated […] the way everyone here looked at me as though any moment in my presence would be their final breath” (257). While the wariness that Erik perceives in those around him is not without cause, he is haunted by the misguided notion that everyone within his palace and in the broader kingdom judges him unforgivingly, and his belief reveals that his own self-esteem has been shattered by the brutal treatment and psychological abuse that he suffered at the hands of his father and then his uncle. Effectively, although Thorvald’s toxic parenting has succeeded in making Erik ruthless, this abuse has also purposefully isolated Erik, depriving him of significant emotional connection while rendering him entirely dependent upon his father for validation and self-worth.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence