Catherine the Great: Portrait of a Woman

Robert K. Massie

82 pages 2-hour read

Robert K. Massie

Catherine the Great: Portrait of a Woman

Nonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 2011

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 7Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Content Warning: This section of the guide contains discussions of graphic violence, illness or death, death by suicide, suicidal ideation, child death, pregnancy loss or termination, mental illness, and gender discrimination.

Part 7: “My Name Is Catherine the Second”

Part 7, Chapter 64 Summary: “Catherine, Paul, and Natalia”

Catherine’s nine-year struggle to conceive with Peter had ended when Empress Elizabeth forced her to choose a surrogate father for a Russian heir. After Paul’s birth, Elizabeth took custody of him, permanently damaging Catherine’s bond with her son. Sergei Saltykov, likely Paul’s biological father, abandoned her, while Peter humiliated Catherine and threatened her with confinement in a convent.


When Catherine seized power in 1762, the question of succession haunted her reign. Court insiders believed Saltykov had fathered Paul, but the public accepted him as Peter III’s legitimate son. At her coronation, crowds cheered Paul as heir, and Catherine recognized him as a rival. As he matured, Paul came to resemble and idealize Peter III, questioning his death and imitating his Prussian militarism. Kept under Nikita Panin’s supervision, he remained unstable, and after a serious illness in 1771, Panin urged marriage to steady him.


In 1773, Paul married Wilhelmina of Hesse-Darmstadt, renamed Natalia Alekseyevna. During the journey to Russia, she and Andrei Razumovsky formed an attachment that reportedly continued after her arrival. Catherine warned Paul, but he refused to act.


In 1776, Natalia and her baby died after a prolonged labor; the child—a boy—could not be delivered due to the narrowness of Natalia’s pelvis. Paul, devastated, refused to leave her body. Catherine discovered letters confirming Natalia’s affair and confronted him, turning his grief into rage. Exhausted, Paul agreed to remarry.

Part 7, Chapter 65 Summary: “Paul, Maria, and the Succession”

Frederick II of Prussia arranged Paul’s second marriage to Princess Sophia of Württemberg. After visiting Berlin and deepening his admiration for Prussia, Paul married her—renamed Maria Fyodorovna—in September 1776, five months after Natalia’s death. In 1777, Maria gave birth to a son, Alexander, followed by Constantine 18 months later; the couple would have nine children. Catherine granted Paul the palace at Gatchina, where he created a private army drilled in Prussian style.


Paul resented his exclusion from power and envied Catherine’s favorites, especially Potemkin, while she denied him any role in government. She considered bypassing Paul’s succession in favor of Alexander. Maria later claimed Catherine asked her to secure Paul’s renunciation, but she refused. Fearing disinheritance, Paul instructed Maria to seize Catherine’s papers upon her death. When Paul became emperor in 1796, he restored primogeniture, ensuring male succession until the monarchy’s fall in the early-20th century.

Part 7, Chapter 66 Summary: “Potemkin: Builder and Diplomat”

After the first Turkish war, Catherine granted Potemkin authority over the southern provinces. He led the development of “New Russia,” founding cities including Kherson (1778), Sebastopol after the 1783 annexation of Crimea, Ekaterinoslav, and Nikolaev, and planning Odessa. In 1784, he became president of the College of War and a field marshal, reforming the army and overseeing relations with Turkey and the Black Sea Fleet.


In 1781, Joseph II of Austria pledged support against Turkey, ending Panin’s influence. Catherine rejected British overtures for alliance against France. In 1783, she announced Crimea’s annexation, which Potemkin secured largely peacefully. While there, he contracted severe malaria.

Part 7, Chapter 67 Summary: “Crimean Journey and ‘Potemkin Villages’”

Catherine’s 1787 journey to Crimea became famous, later inspiring claims that Potemkin staged the eponymous fake villages. However, observers including Joseph II and the Comte de Ségur confirmed the region’s genuine development.


Departing on January 7, Catherine traveled in a grand procession to Kiev, then down the Dnieper with a fleet carrying thousands. At Kaniev, she met Stanislaus Poniatowski in a strained reunion. Joseph II joined her as they reached Kherson, now a fortified port where ships were launched. An arch proclaimed “the way to Byzantium” (500). In Crimea, Sebastopol showcased the Black Sea Fleet, which Joseph praised as the finest port he had seen. Catherine named Potemkin Prince of Tauris. Soon after her return, Turkey declared war.

Part 7, Chapter 68 Summary: “The Second Turkish War and the Death of Potemkin”

Turkey declared war in 1787, with Russia unprepared. Potemkin took command, with Suvorov delivering battlefield victories. At Ochakov in 1788, a brutal assault killed tens of thousands. After Austria made peace in 1790, Russia fought alone. Suvorov’s capture of Izmail secured a major victory. Sweden also attacked, but peace in 1790 restored borders. The 1791 Treaty of Jassy confirmed Russian control of Crimea, Ochakov, and surrounding territories.


Returning to St. Petersburg, Potemkin grew anxious about Catherine’s new favorite, Platon Zubov. After meeting with Catherine, he departed in July 1791 for the war. Falling ill, he died on October 5, asking to die “in the field” (519). Catherine was devastated, declaring she had no one left to rely on.

Part 7, Chapter 69 Summary: “Art, Architecture, and the Bronze Horseman”

Catherine began collecting art in 1763, acquiring major European collections and expanding her holdings to nearly 4,000 paintings. She admitted her drive was “voracity” (523). Rejecting baroque excess, she favored neoclassicism, building the Little Hermitage and commissioning palaces such as the Tauride. Architects like Charles Cameron and Giacomo Quarenghi reshaped imperial spaces, including Tsarskoe Selo and the Alexander Palace.


Catherine’s most famous commission was Falconet’s equestrian statue of Peter the Great. A massive stone pedestal was transported with great difficulty, and casting the statue required multiple attempts. Falconet eventually left Russia without Catherine’s farewell. Unveiled in 1782, the statue showed Peter towering above the Neva, symbolizing Catherine’s claim to his legacy. The inscription read: “TO PETER THE FIRST, FROM CATHERINE THE SECOND” (532). Later immortalized by Pushkin, it embodied her effort to align herself with Peter’s greatness.

Part 7, Chapter 70 Summary: “They Are Capable of Hanging Their King from a Lamppost!”

The French Revolution began in 1789 with the Estates-General and rapidly escalated: The National Assembly formed, the Bastille fell, and aristocratic privileges were abolished. Louis XVI’s failed escape in 1791 and subsequent war deepened the crisis.


Catherine reacted with growing alarm, recalling the chaos of the Pugachev rebellion. She declared herself firmly aristocratic. The storming of the Tuileries, the September massacres, and the execution of Louis XVI in 1793 horrified her. She ordered state mourning, severed relations with revolutionary France, and watched as the Reign of Terror unfolded, followed by Napoleon’s rise. The revolution entrenched her fear of popular upheaval.

Part 7, Chapter 71 Summary: “Dissent in Russia, Final Partition of Poland”

The French Revolution completed Catherine’s shift away from Enlightenment ideals. By 1796, she had imposed censorship and closed private presses. When Alexander Radishchev’s Journey from St. Petersburg to Moscow (1790) condemned serfdom and warned of rebellion, Catherine denounced him as worse than Pugachev and sentenced him to death, later commuting it to exile after Potemkin urged leniency. Radishchev later died by suicide.


In Poland, reform efforts alarmed Catherine. The 1791 constitution strengthened the state, prompting her intervention. In 1792, Russian troops invaded, leading to the Second Partition with Prussia. A 1794 uprising led by Thaddeus Kosciuszko was crushed by Suvorov, whose assault on Praga killed thousands. Catherine then pushed for a final partition. In 1795, Russia, Prussia, and Austria erased Poland from the map. Stanislaus abdicated, and Poland disappeared as a nation for 126 years.

Part 7, Chapter 72 Summary: “Twilight”

By 1796, Catherine remained intellectually active despite declining health. She maintained a structured routine of work, audiences, and evenings at the Hermitage, insisting on informality and laughter. She suffered from chronic illness in later life but remained engaged, especially with her grandchildren. She took a dominant role in raising Alexander, whom she groomed as successor, exposing him to Enlightenment ideas through tutors like La Harpe. Caught between Catherine and Paul, Alexander developed a habit of adaptability and indecision.


Catherine sought a political marriage for her granddaughter Alexandra with Gustavus of Sweden, but the match collapsed over religious differences, humiliating the court and affecting Catherine’s health.

Part 7, Chapter 73 Summary: “The Death of Catherine the Great”

On November 5, 1796, Catherine was found unconscious after suffering a stroke. She never regained consciousness and died on November 6. Courtiers speculated whether she might disinherit Paul on her deathbed, but he secured the throne. Paul immediately asserted authority, ordering his mother’s papers sealed. He later staged a symbolic reburial of Peter III, forcing those involved in his death to participate.


Catherine had ruled through enlightened autocracy, claiming to govern by consulting informed opinion. She rejected grand titles in life, though she was later called “the Great.” Following on from Peter the Great, she had reshaped Russia, expanding its borders, strengthening its cultural institutions, and advancing its intellectual life. Her reign helped lay the groundwork for Russia’s later literary and artistic achievements.


Even late in life, Catherine retained her love of laughter and was especially fond of playing games like blindman’s buff. Massie concludes that her rise from a minor German princess to one of Russia’s greatest rulers marked an extraordinary and improbable journey.

Part 7 Analysis

In this concluding section of the biography, Massie consolidates Catherine’s legacy posthumously by examining the conflicts that defined her personal life and political career. The fraught relationship between Catherine and her son, Paul, provides the narrative’s central psychological thread, illustrating how dynastic anxiety shaped both public policy and private identity. Catherine’s treatment of Paul—her emotional distance, exclusion from power, and transparent preference for her grandson Alexander as heir—is viewed by Massie as a protracted political strategy, as well as an ironic replication of Catherine’s difficult relationship with her own mother. Massie shows that Catherine viewed Paul as a rival whose idealization of Peter III and Prussian militarism represented a direct threat to the empire she had meticulously constructed. This dynamic forces a reconsideration of the theme of Self-Invention as the Supreme Political Act; while Catherine successfully manufactured a persona that secured her own throne for decades, she could not invent a familial relationship that would secure its succession according to her wishes. Paul’s response, creating a miniature Prussian-style army at Gatchina and, upon his accession, immediately restoring primogeniture, constitutes a direct and symbolic repudiation of his mother’s reign and the very means by which she had taken power.


The biography crystallizes The Costs of Imperial Expansion through its depiction of Potemkin’s final years and the 1787 Crimean journey. The narrative presents the journey as an authentic display of state power, a carefully orchestrated performance for both internal and international audiences. The new cities of Kherson and Sebastopol, and the newly built Black Sea Fleet, were tangible results of an imperial vision. Yet, this vision has a provocative edge, epitomized by the arch over Kherson’s entrance proclaiming “the way to Byzantium” (500), a declaration that contributed to the Second Turkish War. Massie’s description of the war, particularly the account of the massive casualties of the siege of Ochakov, makes explicit the bloodshed required to realize such ambitions. Potemkin’s death from malaria, a disease contracted during the initial annexation of the Crimea, is another reminder of the personal price of Catherine’s imperial project, leaving Catherine without the partner who had been both co-creator and chief instrument of her expansionist policies.


Catherine’s patronage of arts and architecture is analyzed as another instrument of statecraft, a method of legitimizing her reign and cementing her legacy. Her rejection of baroque exuberance in favor of neoclassical simplicity was a conscious aesthetic choice that mirrored her political self-presentation as an enlightened, rational monarch. Massie considers that her project of self-projection finds its ultimate expression in the commission of the Bronze Horseman statue. The monument is more than a tribute; it is a calculated political statement. By dedicating the statue with the inscription “TO PETER THE FIRST, FROM CATHERINE THE SECOND,” (523) she forges a direct lineage with Russia’s great modernizer, effectively bypassing her husband and asserting her own claim as Peter’s true successor. This cultural production is central to Catherine’s historical legacy, demonstrating how Catherine used art to shape public memory and canonize her own historical significance, making a physical argument in stone and bronze for the legitimacy of her usurped throne.


The biography’s final chapters chronicle the reversal of Catherine’s liberal ideals in the face of the French Revolution, illustrating the theme of The Dynamic Between Personal Ideals and Structures of Power. The same empress who corresponded with Voltaire and hosted Diderot became a reactionary censor, banning the work of Alexander Radishchev. His book, A Journey from St. Petersburg to Moscow (1790), which condemned the evils of serfdom, mirrored sentiments Catherine herself had expressed in her Nakaz. Her reaction, however, was fury; she branded its author “a rabble-rouser, worse than Pugachev” (552). The Pugachev rebellion had already exposed the fragility of social order, but the regicide in France confirmed her deepest fears of anarchy. Consequently, her foreign policy shifted from a theoretical opposition to Jacobinism to a practical subjugation of Poland, an act she justified as containing the spread of revolutionary “madness.” The destruction of Poland thus becomes Massie’s final demonstration of how the imperative to maintain autocratic power crushed Catherine’s earlier Enlightenment convictions.


Through its narrative structure, the biography brings Catherine’s story to a definitive close, weighing her achievements against her personal and political contradictions. The failure of the Swedish betrothal and Catherine’s subsequent stroke depict the biological decay of a formidable political will. Her death acts as a narrative trigger for Paul’s immediate and symbolic revenge: the exhumation of Peter III and the public humiliation of Alexis Orlov. This act is a final, bitter commentary on the dynastic insecurity that haunted Catherine’s reign. In his final assessment, Massie returns to the opening parallel with Peter the Great, framing Catherine’s legacy compassionately, in the context of her transformative impact on Russia. By concluding with an anecdote of the empress playing games, the biography reinforces its dual focus, leaving the reader with an image that reconciles the powerful ruler with the individual woman.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 82 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs