68 pages • 2-hour read
Daniel L. EverettA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summaries & Analyses
Reading Tools
Daniel L. Everett’s work with Brazil’s Indigenous agency, FUNAI (Fundação Nacional dos Povos Indígenas, or National Foundation of Indigenous Peoples, formerly called the Brazilian National Indian Foundation), situates his narrative within the nation’s ongoing struggle to legally recognize and protect Indigenous lands. In 1910, Brazil’s SPI (Serviço de Proteção ao Índio, or Indian Protection Service) was founded to protect Indigenous populations and facilitate their integration into mainstream Brazilian society. However, over the next several decades, the organization became increasingly corrupt and was responsible for abuses of the very people it was designed to protect. In 1967, SPI was disbanded, and FUNAI was created in its stead. To this day, FUNAI is the government body responsible for policies concerning Indigenous peoples, a central part of which is demarcation: the formal process of identifying, mapping, and legally registering ancestral territories. Brazil’s 1988 Constitution formally recognized Indigenous populations’ right to their ancestral land, as well as their right to live free from pressure to abandon traditional ways of life and assimilate into mainstream culture. Securing legal title is the first and most critical step toward enabling Indigenous autonomy and survival, and FUNAI began the process of demarcating lands in order to shield communities from illegal logging, mining, and agricultural expansion. Everett’s memoir highlights this process, as he describes serving as an interpreter during a FUNAI expedition to chart traditional Pirahã areas of hunting, fishing, and settlement. During the journey, the team discovered that official government maps were inaccurate, underscoring the necessity of on-the-ground work with Indigenous experts to establish correct boundaries. By participating in this effort, Everett directly engages with the political mechanisms designed to safeguard the Pirahã future, illustrating how their way of life is inextricably linked to national land-rights policies.
Everett’s linguistic findings from the Pirahã community ignited one of the most significant scientific debates of the early 21st century by challenging the theory of universal grammar (UG). Proposed by linguist Noam Chomsky, UG posits that all humans are born with an innate, underlying grammatical structure preprogrammed into the brain. A key feature of UG is recursion, the ability to embed a linguistic unit within another of the same type, as in “the cat that ate the rat.” This feature is considered fundamental to the limitless creativity of human language. In a widely cited 2002 article in the journal Science, Chomsky and his co-authors argued that recursion might be the single defining component of the human-language faculty. However, Everett’s study of the Pirahã language, which has practically nothing in common with any other living language, revealed a number of inconsistencies with the theory of UG. Everett’s 2005 paper in Current Anthropology, which claimed that Pirahã lacks recursion, directly contradicted the UG thesis. The paper triggered a wave of academic responses, including personal and professional backlash toward Everett.
Don’t Sleep, There Are Snakes brings this controversy to a general audience, as Everett argues that Pirahã’s grammatical simplicity is a product of its culture. Everett proposes an “immediacy of experience principle” (84), a cultural value that constrains communication to personal experience, thereby making embedded clauses and other abstractions of speech unnecessary. Instead of using recursion, speakers place sentences sequentially, as when one says, “Hey Paitá, bring back some nails. Dan bought those very nails. They are the same” (227). Everett also identifies other grammatical “gaps,” such as the absence of number and color words, further contesting the idea that certain linguistic categories are universal and situating grammar as a tool born of culture and circumstance, rather than an innate part of human development.



Unlock all 68 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.