Exodus: How Migration Is Changing Our World

The book frequently uses rhetorical questions. How do these function within the argument, and how do they influence the reader’s perception of migration as a complex issue? What other rhetorical techniques does Collier use?

How does the text critique utilitarianism as a basis for migration policy? What are the key arguments for and against relying on this ethical framework, and how does it compare to other possible approaches?

Collier contrasts different national approaches to migration, from Japan’s strict policies to Dubai’s rapid influx of foreign workers. How do these case studies contribute to the broader argument about migration policy?

How does Collier justify the use of simplified models in explaining complex migration patterns? What are the limitations, and why?

How does Collier analyze the narratives surrounding migration? What type of narratives surround migration in your own country, and how do they compare to the kinds of narratives Collier highlights?

Analyze Collier’s treatment of multicultural and national identity in the book. What are the challenges and possibilities posed by migration to national identity? How can these issues be best addressed?

Collier speaks of the “brain drain” effect on countries that experience high rates of emigration. How does he characterize this phenomenon? What possible incentives or approaches do you believe could work to help countries retain native talent? How do your ideas compare to Collier’s?

What policy recommendations does Collier offer for managing migration in host countries? Which of his recommendations do you find most or least convincing? What other possible policy ideas may Collier have overlooked?