A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summaries & Analyses
Author Insights
Quizzes
Reading Tools
The novel began at a moment when Wood had already decided she was done with fiction. She was in the middle of a depression in the summer of 2019 and had convinced herself that playwriting was her new direction. Then something refused to honor that decision.
One of the weirdest symptoms of my malaise was a constant, distant monologue in my head that I knew was a fictional character waiting to be born. I told her to please go away, find another writer, I’m just not up to another novel, thank you very much.
She stopped arguing with the voice in late summer. What followed was one of those founding moments that writers tend to remember in exact physical detail, because it arrived not as a plan but as a reflex.
One night in late summer, I woke around three, grabbed a notebook, crept downstairs, sat on the bottom step, and by the light of a streetlight coming in through my screen door I wrote what would become Chapter 1 in the voice of a young woman struggling toward self-forgiveness. The rest of the novel unspooled from there.
That single nocturnal session set the emotional frequency the whole book would have to sustain: a young woman trying to earn back her own good opinion of herself, in a world that had already rendered its verdict.
The prison setting was not research Wood gathered for the book. It was experience she had already accumulated over years of running a reading and writing program at the Maine Correctional Center in Windham, where she went in as a visiting author and stayed. What she found there changed what she thought she knew about distance.
The line between them and me is finer than I ever imagined…it’s not a small thing to understand.
Wood’s usual method involves revising so continuously as she writes that what she calls a first draft is functionally several passes deep. This book broke that habit. She let the draft run ahead of her judgment, which was itself a small act of discipline for a writer built for control.
I sped along, ‘sped’ used very relatively here, until I had a true first draft.
The whole novel took two years to complete, roughly half her usual pace. The COVID-19 pandemic, rather than halting progress, gave her sustained uninterrupted time at home to move it forward.
For the parrot lab scenes, Wood traced a decades-long private fascination to its source. The African grey parrots who give the character Violet her first real sense of purpose after release were not invented for the plot. They came from a specific researcher Wood had been following since the 1980s.
From when I was a really little child, I always have been fascinated by birds. In the ‘80s I came upon the research of Dr. Irene Pepperberg who has done avian cognition studies. What these birds can do is so astonishing and tells us so much about animal intelligence we didn’t know before.
Writing this book also brought a structural first: Wood worked with a formal writing group for the first time in her career. The group was not a workshop of developing writers but a circle of peers with full novels behind them, and their involvement ran deep enough to change what the manuscript could become.
This is the first book I’ve written with the moral support of a writing group, and I don’t know how I ever wrote anything without them. All of us are established, serious novelists (Bill Roorbach, Kate Christensen, Lewis Robinson, and Sarah Braunstein) who read literally hundreds of pages at a time for each other.
Publication itself became a test of a different kind. The book was originally scheduled for May 2023, but the HarperCollins union went on strike as final production ramped up. Wood, raised in what she called a dyed-in-the-wool union family, pulled the manuscript. The strike ran three months, and she genuinely feared the book had lost its window.
My choice was crystal clear: Pull the book until the strike ended. The strike lasted three long months, and I feared the book would lose its chance altogether. But sometimes karma is your friend; How to Read a Book was published after all, exactly one year later.
The character of Harriet, the teacher who runs the prison book club, carries Wood’s own protocols and confusions from years of real sessions at the Maine Correctional Center. In those sessions, Wood found that what she wanted for the women inside ran directly against how the institution framed them.
I want them to think of themselves as more than inmates, more than whatever they’ve done wrong.
The books themselves, in those real sessions, did something Wood had not entirely anticipated before she started. They made a separate space. That discovery made its way into the novel’s central claim about what reading actually provides.
The world of books and ideas is a weekly oasis from the rest of our lives.
Wood will say the book’s moral center plainly when asked. It is not a vague hope for compassion but a specific claim about where human beings actually live in relation to their worst and best moments.
We humans are not the worst thing we have ever done, nor the best; we reside on a continuum of human strength and frailty, a continuum stuffed with all manner of jackassery and grace. To forgive that messy dichotomy, in ourselves and in others, forms the heart of the human condition.
Having a moral center is not the same as wanting to deliver one. Wood draws a sharp line between the feeling she hopes readers leave with and the idea that fiction should resolve into instruction. The characters are built to resist the kind of easy arc that would let a reader arrive at a lesson and stop there.
I want them to come away with a feeling that they have been somewhere they never had thought to go before. All I want really is for my characters to feel like real people for the readers to experience them. I don’t need to teach a lesson.
The specific demand that characters contain contradiction is, for Wood, not a stylistic preference but the condition for the whole project. A character who is only one thing cannot carry the book’s argument about human variability, because the argument depends on readers recognizing the variability as real.
I like characters who aren’t just one thing. Everyone has to be a little bit of everything. People can be jerks one day and angels the next. That’s what makes people interesting.
That insistence on moral complexity extends to the book’s reception. By the time the novel reached its twentieth foreign translation and moved toward a twenty-first in Arabic, its audience had expanded well beyond the American book clubs that first gave it momentum, which suggests the argument about forgiveness is landing in contexts Wood never wrote toward.