A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summaries & Analyses
Plot Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Part 1, Chapters 1-5
Part 1, Chapters 6-10
Part 1, Chapters 11-15
Part 1, Chapters 16-20
Part 1, Chapters 21-25
Part 2, Chapters 26-30
Part 2, Chapters 31-35
Part 2, Chapters 36-40
Part 2, Chapters 41-45
Part 2, Chapters 46-50
Part 2, Chapters 51-55
Part 2, Chapters 56-60
Part 2, Chapters 61-65
Part 2, Chapters 66-70
Part 2, Chapters 71-74
Part 3, Chapters 75-80
Part 3, Chapters 81-85
Part 3, Chapters 86-90
Part 3, Chapters 91-95
Part 3, Chapters 96-102
Character List
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Book Club Questions
Author Insights
Quizzes
Reading Tools
McMurtry grew up on a cattle ranch in Archer County, Texas, surrounded by men whose lives had been shaped by a vanishing way of working the land. His father was among the finest of them, but McMurtry left for Rice University and Stanford, and the distance between those two worlds never fully closed. The novel was his longest attempt to cross it.
I wrote Lonesome Dove in the main to try and understand my father, who was as fine a cowboy as I’ve ever known.
Before it was a novel, the project was a film. In the early 1970s, McMurtry and director Peter Bogdanovich, fresh off their collaboration on The Last Picture Show, wrote a script intended for John Wayne as Call and Jimmy Stewart as Gus, with the name Augustus chosen partly for how Stewart would say it. Wayne dropped out, the project stalled for fifteen years, and McMurtry eventually repurposed the material after spotting a church bus with the words painted on its side. The title came from that sighting. By the time he sat down to write the novel, he believed he was doing something the Western genre rarely attempted.
I thought I was writing a critique of the Western. It’s now the chief source of Western mythology.
That reversal, a demythologizing book that became the myth’s most beloved monument, is the contradiction McMurtry spent the rest of his life trying to explain.
McMurtry had been skeptical of cowboy culture long before he wrote the novel, and he was careful to separate admiration for the physical skill from any uncritical reverence for what that culture represented. His respect had a ceiling.
I thought that ‘Lonesome Dove’ was, in a way, a critique of it because I’m not — I grew up with cowboys. I respect them up to a point. But I’m not crazy about them.
McMurtry’s ranch house had no books when he was a boy, but he eventually encountered an abridged Don Quixote, and it stayed with him longer than anything else he read in those years. When he built the relationship between Gus and Call, he was not thinking of the real Texas ranchers Charles Goodnight and Oliver Loving, whose trail-drive story most readers assume inspired the novel. He was thinking about Cervantes.
the grave differences (comically set) between Sancho and the Don. Between the two is where fiction, as I have mostly read and written it, lives.
His working method across his career was disciplined and unsentimental. He wrote toward a fixed daily target without ceremony, and he treated the opening pages as the only part of the process that required real labor. Once those were right, the rest followed at the same steady pace.
If I labor over any part of a novel, it’s the beginning. Once I have the beginning in acceptable form, I move on from there — again, writing five pages a day, no more, no less.
Blue Duck, the novel’s most menacing figure, had a specific historical anchor. The name came from a real person, a man connected to Belle Starr, the outlaw whose story McMurtry knew well. The real Blue Duck gave McMurtry not a plot but a name, and that was enough.
Belle Starr, a rather famous female outlaw, had a boyfriend named Blue Duck. The name derived from him. I knew Blue Duck was a great villain. The force of evil, if you can harness it, is powerful.
Once a book was finished, McMurtry moved on completely. He did not revisit Lonesome Dove and was not involved in the production of the celebrated 1989 miniseries that made the story known to millions of viewers who had never read the book. When people treated the show’s success as his achievement, he drew a careful line.
I was never on the set. I turned the key in the ignition. I didn’t drive the car.
The stoicism McMurtry observed in his father had a traceable source. His grandmother had hauled water bucket by bucket from a stream to the house, raising twelve children on raw country. That labor had used her up, and it had left McMurtry’s father permanently shaped by her standard, impatient with any woman who couldn’t meet it. McMurtry carried that image into the novel’s treatment of women in the West.
I think that women had a terrible time in the early West. Many of them went berserk. And I think that it was a masculine culture, maybe of necessity. But it was a masculine culture and to some extent crude, to some extent fascistic, certainly not welcoming to women.
He pointed to the scene between Clara Allen and Woodrow Call as the moment where the novel’s argument about gender becomes impossible to miss. Clara tells Call directly that there was no room for a woman in the life he and Gus had built together. For McMurtry, writing that scene was not a detour from the book’s subject; it was the subject, and the Western myth’s failure to reckon with it was one he tracked well beyond the novel’s pages.
The Western notion of masculinity goes back a long way. It doesn’t allow for women, and it’s also racist — it doesn’t allow for other cultures.
McMurtry was consistent over decades in describing what he had intended the novel to do. He expected readers to feel the violence, the moral failure, and the cost of the drive, not to romanticize them. That expectation was not met.
A lot of bad things happen in ‘Lonesome Dove.’ And a lot of them are not nice. They are not civilized… The whole book is permeated with criticism of the Old West from start to finish.
He argued that the real subject of the novel was not cattle, not Montana, not even the friendship between Gus and Call. Newt, the teenager who travels the entire length of the cattle drive as Captain Call’s unacknowledged son, held the emotional center. McMurtry was explicit about what he believed the novel was actually about.
If one cuts more deeply, the lonesome dove is Newt, a lonely teenager who is the unacknowledged son of Captain Call and a kindly whore named Maggie, who is now dead. So the central theme of the novel is not the stocking of Montana (with cattle) but unacknowledged paternity.
McMurtry described the book as “the Gone with the Wind of the West,” and he did not offer that comparison as praise. He meant that the characters had overpowered the argument he had built around them, the same way Scarlett O’Hara overwhelms any critique of the antebellum South that Gone with the Wind might have intended. Readers fell in love and stayed there.
Lonesome Dove is the Gone with the Wind of the West. Which is both good and bad.
When asked directly whether his long effort to demythologize the West had made any difference, McMurtry did not soften his answer. The myth had absorbed the critique without flinching, and he knew it.
I haven’t succeeded at all. It’s just as racist and misogynistic as it ever was.