The Artist

Lucy Steeds

The Artist

Lucy Steeds
55 pages1-hour read
Fiction
Novel
Adult
Published in 2025

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Background

Sociohistorical Context: Women Artists at the Turn of the 20th Century

In the early 20th century, institutional barriers deeply limited opportunities for women artists. In Paris, the world’s art capital, the prestigious state-sponsored École des Beaux-Arts did not admit women until 1897, and even then, their education was restricted. An important element of academic training was life drawing from nude models, which was considered essential for creating large-scale history paintings, the most respected artistic genre. However, female students were largely barred from these classes, a policy rooted in societal notions of female modesty. This exclusion effectively prevented women from mastering the skills required to compete with male artists in the highest echelons of the art world. This historical reality forms the basis of Ettie’s artistic journey. Tartuffe’s lie that women are not allowed in the Académie at all is a cruel exaggeration of a real systemic bias, designed to keep her isolated and dependent.


Despite the systemic barriers they faced, several women artists gained acclaim at the turn of the century. One of the most significant figures from this era is Georgia O’Keeffe (1887-1986), whose paintings Ettie and Peggy discuss in the novel. Although she trained in traditional methods at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago and New York’s Art Students League, she made major contributions to modern art through her experimental, abstract approach. She challenged viewers to consider everyday subjects from a new perspective through her paintings and charcoal sketches, particularly her “radical depictions of flowers” (“About Georgia O’Keeffe,” Georgia O’Keeffe Museum, 2026).


Other female artists lacked access to formal training and, like Ettie, found unconventional ways to educate themselves. For example, Suzanne Valadon (1865-1938) began her career in the 1880s as a model for artists like Renoir and Toulouse-Lautrec, studying their techniques before becoming a celebrated painter in her own right. She became a full-time painter at age 44 and held her first solo exhibition two years later. Her work stands out among other painters of her era because she painted female nudes of “unidealized, active women, challenging the convention of the sexualized, passive female body” (“Suzanne Valandon,” National Museum of Women in the Arts, 2026). Like Valadon, Ettie forges her own artistic identity outside the established system. Her secret life as a forger becomes a radical response to a world designed to exclude her, making her success both a deception and a triumph over historical constraints. In The Artist and the Feast, Steeds uses the story of the fictional Ettie to celebrate the skill and strength of the real women artists who defied systemic misogyny at the turn of the 20th century.

Medical Context: “Shell Shock” and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Rupert’s traumatic ordeal is based on the historical mistreatment of “shell shock” during World War I. Shell shock, now understood as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), was a poorly understood condition affecting millions of soldiers. In contrast to the modern-day understanding of PTSD’s psychological effects, the diagnosis of “shell shock” often focuses on physiological symptoms like “tremor, loss of balance, headache and fatigue,” (Jones, Edgar. “Shell Shocked,” American Psychological Association, June 2012). However, many medical professionals of the era viewed these indicators as signs of cowardice or a lack of moral fiber rather than legitimate psychological injuries from combat.


The Canadian-born Dr. Lewis Yealland has become synonymous with the brutal treatment of veterans with “shell shock,” but his methods were unfortunately “generally in line with medical practice of the time” (Linden, Stefanie, et al. “Shell Shock at Queen Square: Lewis Yealland 100 years on,” Brain, Volume 136, Issue 6, June 2013, pp. 1976-1988). Stationed at the National Hospital for the Paralysed and Epileptic in London, Yealland developed a coercive “cure” that intended to force them back to the front lines quickly and exploited soldiers’ fears of social condemnation: “If you recover quickly, then it is due to a disease, if you recover slowly, […] then I shall decide that your condition is due to malingering” (Linden).


As detailed in his 1918 book Hysterical Disorders of Warfare, Yealland’s disciplinary therapies included administering powerful and painful electric shocks to a patient’s throat, placing lit cigarettes on their tongue, and applying hot plates to the back of their mouth. He believed these aggressive methods could shock a man out of his hysteria in a single session. This context illuminates the horror of Rupert’s experience; Steeds states that his twisted spine and psychological collapse are direct consequences of Dr. Yealland’s state-sanctioned treatments. By grounding Rupert’s suffering in historical practices, the novel critiques the deep failure of the medical establishment to humanely address the unprecedented mental trauma of modern industrial warfare.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 55 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs