The Bluest Eye
The Bluest Eye
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
Summaries & Analyses
Author Insights
Quizzes
NEWReading Tools
Toni Morrison on The Bluest Eye
In her own words: quotes and insights from the author.Why she wrote it
A face nobody put in a bookThe novel grew from a specific gap Morrison had found in every book she studied at Howard University and Cornell: the Black girl who existed at the margins of literature, noticed by no one, taken seriously by no one. That absence was the provocation.
The impetus for writing The Bluest Eye in the first place was to write a book about a kind of person that was never in literature anywhere, never taken seriously by anybody—all those peripheral little girls. So I wanted to write a book that—if that child ever picked it up—would look representational.
The gap in literature had a human face Morrison carried for years: a childhood friend who had prayed for blue eyes for two years and stopped believing in God when they didn’t come. The friend was, by Morrison’s account, very dark-skinned and very beautiful, which made the conversation impossible to dismiss. When Morrison returned to that memory in interviews, she was careful to name what made it different from the violence people typically associate with racism.
This kind of racism hurts. This is not lynchings and murders and drownings. This is interior pain.
That interior pain was precisely what Morrison feared the Black Arts Movement, in its urgency to celebrate, would leave unexamined.
By the mid-1960s, the Black Arts Movement was producing work Morrison respected. But she watched its momentum with unease, worried that a particular wound was about to be papered over before anyone had looked at it directly.
They’re going to skip over something. And no one’s gonna remember that it wasn’t always beautiful, you know. No one’s gonna remember how hurtful a certain kind of internecine racism is. [paraphrased from audio]
How she wrote it
Five years of changing what she didn’t likeThe book began as a writing-group exercise at Howard, a sketch about a Black girl wanting blue eyes. Morrison set it aside after presenting it, returned to it years later in Syracuse while working evenings after her sons went to bed, and spent five years revising with no publisher in mind. That freedom from external expectation shaped how she treated every draft.
It had no real reason for being done except my own reading pleasure. It was like a long reading exercise that took five years. So when I would read it and I didn’t like it a bit, I would change it. [paraphrased from audio]
The drafts began close to Lorain’s actual geography and people she had known. As the manuscript developed, she found that the invented material was pulling harder than the factual. That shift from documentation to imagination is where the novel became its own thing rather than a record of a place. Her editor’s intervention pushed the same lesson from a different direction: a passage she was certain she had nailed turned out to be written in her own emotional register rather than the character’s, and he told her so. The correction cost her a passage she loved.
I had written it the way I would have responded to that situation in my language, my perceptions and not the character’s, and it was awful. So I rewrote the whole thing from her point of view. [paraphrased from audio]
Beyond that single passage, there was a larger structural overhaul. When asked about scrapping her initial conception and rewriting the whole manuscript, Morrison did not frame it as a setback. She named what made the difference between a writer who pushes through a rebuild and one who abandons the project.
That was thrilling to do. But if I had approached it like, ‘Oh, my God, I did it wrong, now I have to do it right,’ I would never have done it at all. It’s a process of discovery.
Her craft philosophy, stated explicitly after the publication of Tar Baby but consistent with every account of how she worked on The Bluest Eye, comes down to a single demand on the prose itself. She was not describing ornament or difficulty; she was describing a quality of concealment, where the work behind each sentence should leave no visible trace.
The language, only the language. The language must be careful and must appear effortless. It must not sweat.
The reader she wrote for was not an audience of thousands. It was herself, specifically herself reading the way she read other people’s books, with the same impatience and the same right to say something wasn’t working. She described this stance not as a quirk but as the condition that let her keep revising honestly.
I am not being facetious when I say I wrote it in order to read it. And I think that is what makes the difference, because I could look at it as a reader, really as a reader, and not as my own work. And then I could say, ‘This doesn’t make me feel right,’ and I could change it.
What she wants us to sit with
Surrender from every direction at oncePecola Breedlove, the novel’s central character, does not break under a single blow. Morrison, in a 1990 conversation with Bill Moyers, mapped the mechanism precisely: the harm comes from everywhere simultaneously, from family, school, movies, the texture of daily life, until refusal becomes impossible. The “master narrative” Morrison names here is the book’s operating premise for how beauty standards become instruments of destruction.
She surrendered completely to the so-called master narrative...the whole notion of what is ugliness, what is worthlessness, what is contempt. She got it from her family, she got it from school, she got it from the movies, she got it everywhere.
Morrison’s decision about who the novel was written for extended beyond the question of Morrison’s own reading pleasure. She had observed that some earlier Black fiction seemed positioned toward an implied outside reader who needed to be convinced of something. She wanted no part of that orientation. The commitment she describes here began with The Bluest Eye and held through everything that followed.
I spent my entire writing life trying to make sure that the white gaze was not the dominant one in any of my books. [paraphrased from audio]
For a reader coming to The Bluest Eye now, that decision is structural: the book does not pause to explain the community to an outsider. It assumes you are already inside.