Tree of Smoke

Denis Johnson

68 pages 2-hour read

Denis Johnson

Tree of Smoke

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2007

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Content Warning: This section includes discussion of graphic violence, murder, rape, and mental illness.

The Harmful Effects of Patriarchal Norms During War

Though the novel describes the widespread psychological devastation caused by war, it especially zooms in on the worsening of corrosive hyper-masculine behavior during times of conflict. Attitudes such as a lack of empathy, a denigration of softer, “feminine” values, the glorification of violence, and the degradation of women rise during war, often leading to horrific consequences. Through James’s character arc, the novel examines the harmful effects of patriarchal norms during war.


The targeted working of the war apparatus is apparent when James undergoes training at Fort Jackson. The training is grueling and invites the men to channel their rage, “yelling like monsters, bayoneting straw men” (139). Filled with dread as he begins to connect the dots and see that he will have to kill real people soon, James can only survive by immersing himself deeper into the simulated violence. The only way to relieve the terror is to stay in action, in a fugue-like state where he functions as a quasi-killing machine.


Since conflict by necessity requires binary thinking, a clear “us” and “them,” it encourages the soldiers to dehumanize anyone who is different from them. The greatest victims of this process of othering are the local women, whom the soldiers routinely refer to as “whores,” and “meat.” James and Bill have an entire phone conversation about women in Saigon without once using the word “women”; instead, they use only objectifying, dehumanizing terms like “pussy.” The process of othering leads to a hatred of the enemy, the apex of which is the “Kootchy Kootie” spooning out the eyeballs of the captured VC.


This hatred is tacitly approved and encouraged by larger systems and authority figures, as is evident when the colonel tells James that it is permissible to hate in times of war. Significantly, James’s hatred is shown to be a runaway train, with James eager to hurt the enemy, even when it is clear the enemy is not always to blame for the harm caused to James’s fellow soldiers. In an illuminating sequence, James learns from a nurse that Harmon was hit not by a North Vietnam grenade or bullet, but by one of the signal flares used almost exclusively by US ground forces during the Vietnam War. The realization stuns James but does little to appease his desire for vengeance against the Vietnamese. Soon afterward, he asks the colonel to transfer him to an LRRP unit so that he can hunt down an enemy who did not really harm the Sarge, and this request proves how deeply the war has altered his psyche.


Finally, James’s rape and murder of the woman suspected to be a VC is the culmination of this change, showing the final, extreme consequences of violent patriarchal attitudes and norms in conflict zones. Instead of holding James accountable for his actions, the army merely discharges him, agreeing to pretend that it is an honorable discharge. The army’s unwillingness to confront the true horrors of such crimes reveals that these violent norms are perpetrated and endorsed from the top down.

The Search for Faith and Meaning in an Arbitrary World

The novel frequently creates an ambience of absurdity and surreality in the midst of wartime violence and destruction, placing the characters into situations where they struggle to make sense of what is happening or to find a higher sense of purpose. Through the characters’ inner turmoil, the novel examines the search for faith and meaning in an arbitrary world.


The novel frequently emphasizes how characters often seek meaning through idealistic schemes, only to be disappointed with the reality. Skip clamors for a position in Vietnam so he can indulge in thrilling, “real” espionage, yet he gets stranded in a “villa in the boonies” (190), once again sifting through endless, incomprehensible documents. Thus, the colonel’s grandiose project evaporates even before it is truly launched. The greatest absurdity is war itself, where half a village can be wiped out in an instant. Survival, too, is random, with the experiences of Carignan and Kathy showing them that it is impossible to predict which sick child or wounded woman will survive through the night. Stranded in this nihilistic-seeming world, the only way forward is for characters to seek faith and meaning.


Characters often turn to philosophies and religions, and the novel is filled with allusions to several faiths, from Buddhism to Seventh Day Adventism. Those who are not overtly religious try to find meaning through studying works of literature, philosophy, and strategy, as when Skip reads the diaries of Dr. Bouquet, which are filled with notes on thinkers and artists like Antonin Artaud and Emil Cioran. Despite the presence of these philosophical and religious systems, the world challenges the faith of the characters at every turn, filling them with spiritual terror. This dynamic is most evident in the case of Kathy and Trung, two of the most impassioned people in the novel. The more Kathy tries to believe in the possibility of salvation, the more she sees horrors convincing her that some people are “fated from the foundation of the world to spend eternity in Hell” (227). Trung, who sacrificed his youth and personal ties for the communist cause, now faces the pain of betraying that cause when he recognizes that it is not delivering what he believes it promised.


However, some characters do ultimately find the meaning they seek. As Trung tells Skip, the pain of his betrayal is also “the pain of life returning” (392). Trung has not abandoned the search for meaning, but has been slowly returning to a different kind of faith, inspired by his Buddhist and Confucianist heritage, which favors acceptance over violence. He tells Skip that he continues to seek the truth of “Dukkha, Samudaya, Nirodha, Magga” (393), that life is suffering, but in letting go of attachment, one can achieve liberation. Trung’s journey back to his religious roots and community signifies that instead of being abandoned, the search for meaning has to be constantly refined and reexamined.


A similar movement occurs for Kathy at the novel’s end, with her realizing that ultimately “all will be saved” and recovering her faith (615). Despite the absurdity of the world, she accepts that human beings have no choice but to keep faith in humanity.

The Impossibility of Simple Ethical Choices During Armed Conflict

While the novel initially presents the Vietnam War through the idealistic eyes of Skip, who regards both his own country and his uncle, the colonel, as heroic forces for good, the narrative soon reveals that war poses endless ethical dilemmas that subvert such binary thinking. The novel thus repeatedly emphasizes the impossibility of making simple ethical choices during armed conflict.


The difficulty of making ethically sound choices during war is at the heart of the real story of the colonel’s escape from the Japanese ship, which Skip only discovers after his death. After the colonel’s aircraft is shot down by the Japanese, he becomes a prisoner of war, packed into a ship. When one of the colonel’s fellow prisoners has a mental health crisis and begins to yell incessantly, the Japanese captors threaten to close the ship’s hatch and suffocate all the prisoners unless the screaming man quiets down immediately. Now the colonel faces an impossible choice: Let the man live and condemn himself and the others, or kill the man and take the sin of one murder on his soul. The colonel chooses the latter and strangles the man. Having “soiled his soul” (448), the colonel comes up with the corpse of the man and is thrown overboard. His ruse works, and he reaches land alive. The prison ship incident suggests that there are no clear ethical answers to be found in wartime.


The dilemma of choice is particularly grave for Vietnamese characters in the novel, since their very survival depends on making the right decision, as evinced in the case of Hao. Hao thinks he is protected by allying with the colonel, whom he thinks represents America, yet the illusion breaks as soon as he and Kim are taken in for questioning. In this context, Hao’s decision to betray the colonel and Trung is another complex choice that he makes for his survival. The decision is Hao’s bridge to getting out of his situation alive. Hao well understands the weight of his decision, reflecting in the novel’s last chapter that it is the “luck and the sacrifice of others” that have brought him and his wife to safety (541).


Skip, whose early naivete led him to believe there was a clear “right” side, and this side was American, realizes at the end of the novel that some rights were wrong all along. In his last long letter to Kathy, he states that though his choices are now seen as criminal, the far more unethical choice was war, which was celebrated. For Skip, the decision to run a minor arms racket is ethically far superior to running Psy Ops for the true criminals of the world, even though the arms supply helps to fuel such violent conflicts. Skip’s epiphany shows how the gap between perceived ethical superiority and reality further complicates people’s choices, especially in times of conflict.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence