Where I Was From

Joan Didion

56 pages 1-hour read

Joan Didion

Where I Was From

Nonfiction | Essay Collection | Adult | Published in 2003

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 2, Chapters 1-7Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Content Warning: This section includes discussion of sexual violence, child sex abuse, and racism.

Part 2, Chapter 1 Summary

Didion recounts the plot of William Faulkner’s 1935 short story “Golden Land,” which follows Ira Ewing Jr., a real estate mogul who fled to California as a teen and now lives a life of comfort. Despite his material wealth, Ira has a troubled family life, as his daughter Samantha is embroiled in a public sex scandal and his son Voyd won’t speak after being caught drunkenly cross-dressing. Ira refuses to acknowledge these problems, but his mother finds out and reprimands him for making money too easily in a place they have no ties to.


Didion remembers reading this story and feeling proud of being one of the long-time Californian families. She recalls hearing derisive talk about “new people” in the state, usually those who moved after World War II, who didn’t understand their lifestyle or climate. Her grandfather used to teach her to kill any rattlesnake she saw, since that was “the code of the West” (96) that new people didn’t know. Her grandfather was passionate about not revising California’s history, as he came from a family who migrated through the harsh Sierra Nevada. Didion notes the irony in these migrants never seeing themselves as “new” people, nor acknowledging that new people are those who bring the money to the state.


Families like the Irvines, whose entrepreneurial early relatives became the namesake for the city of Irvine, feel a strong nostalgia for prewar California. Joan Irvine Smith founded a museum for her collection of oil paintings of California, which reminds her of the landscape of her childhood. Joan purchased many of the paintings from the California Club, a prestigious Los Angeles social club she visited as a child. Didion finds the exhibition’s nostalgia somewhat peculiar, as Joan was the main proponent of rapidly developing her family’s land in the 1960s.


Didion understands that navigating the inheritance of such an enterprise is difficult, as Jane Hollister once explained following her father’s death. Joan took over her mother’s position in the Irvine Company at 24 years old, and she had to confront the board with a radical plan. Joan pushed for the development of the ranch, which included a new University of California campus. The development of this and another ranch grew the Orange County population from 700,000 to 3 million within four decades. However, the lives of all these new people were nowhere near as prosperous as the Irvines’. By the 1980s, there was a whole cohort known as “motel people” who were low-wage workers priced out of owning permanent homes.

Part 2, Chapter 2 Summary

Didion describes the Californian city of Lakewood, a postwar subdivision built on agricultural land near the Douglas Aircraft Company’s Long Beach manufacturing plant. Developers advertised space for up to 17,500 homes, as well as playgrounds and schools. At the center of the city was a massive shopping center. 


Lakewood’s emergence and early success came at a time of perfect conditions, as the government increased spending on defense manufacturing during the Cold War and promoted growth of the middle consumer class. Buyers crowded the development offices in 1950, and as sales slowed, the Korean War reinvigorated interest. Most of the new residents were young families, many of them veterans. Donald J. Waldie, an author and Lakewood public servant, describes Lakewood as a symbol of the American dream. Demographically, Lakewood was predominantly white with a close to even split of California-born and transplants from the Midwest and South. Most residents worked in the aerospace plants or naval shipyards.


However, Didion explains that this prosperity didn’t last, as by 1992 the nearby Rockwell plant closed and defense contracts dried up or moved out of state. Statistics from the 1990s show the drastic layoffs in this industry, as well as the low percentage of people who could find similar—or indeed any—work. Lakewood residents feared the Douglas plant would shut down entirely, as it was already the site of nearly 18,000 layoffs. Social gatherings were colored by discussions of economic woes, and businesses were boarded up. For Didion, Lakewood’s fate exemplifies yet another instance of federal assistance being the main, unspoken support for a community’s prosperity.


In March of 1993, Lakewood was thrust into the national media spotlight after nine Lakewood High School students and alums were charged with a plethora of sexual crimes. These boys were members of an “informal fraternity” called the Spur Posse. Through public statements and her own conversations, Didion illustrates how the citizens of Lakewood thought the media was placing undue stress on the community. Residents latched onto the idea that the high school was handing out free condoms and used this to explain why the boys had flawed understandings of sex. Didion quotes one representative resident who couldn’t comprehend such immorality occurring in their upper-middle-class community. A protestor picketing at the district attorney’s office similarly describes Lakewood as a quiet, inoffensive community.


Through a quote from Donald J. Waldie’s book, Didion explores the contradiction at the heart of Lakewood’s identity: Their community isn’t truly middle-class, no matter what they tell themselves. She asks a string of rhetorical questions about what happens to such communities when the basis of their prosperity is gone, and when they envision themselves as something greater than they are. She concludes with what she calls an exemplary moment from one of the Spurs’ television appearances. A black female audience member questioned the intelligence of one of the Spurs, Chris Albert, and he got defensive; he denigrated the woman and assumed she worked minimum-wage at a fast-food restaurant, while he went to college.

Part 2, Chapter 3 Summary

Cities like Lakewood were built as company towns, with the express purpose of having employees near their workplace and tied down by mortgages. The ideal resident was a young male who proved he was a “good citizen” through consumption and team sports. When these male citizens stop being useful, Didion proposes, situations like the Spurs scandal occur. She quotes one man who sees the most vocal Spurs, those on the talk shows, as in it only for the money because they are unemployed. Didion finds that some citizens, no longer feeling useful, turn the blame for their community’s corruption outward, like onto immigrants or the media.


Feelings of unease about changes in Lakewood’s community were brewing a year before the charges. Residents thought the sexual aspect of the conversation was the wrong lens to use, as the teenage boys’ behavior prior to the charges was more like gang intimidation. Younger children were periodically bullied at parks and schools, and young women were stalked. Didion quotes several people who knew girls that were too afraid to leave their homes for fear of getting assaulted. Activity escalated in 1992 as Spurs committed real crimes, primarily theft.


A major incident that finally prompted residents to ask questions about this gang was when a pipe bomb exploded on the front porch of a home. Following this escalation, Lakewood High School and the police called a meeting with parents of suspected Spurs members. At the not-well-attended meeting, the sheriff discussed the web of crimes, and the topic of rape came up. The sheriff’s sex-abuse unit then began interviewing students at the high school, and a high-profile sex crimes attorney, Gloria Allred, began making appearances in the media. With little warning, the sheriff’s department arrested the nine boys at school on March 18, 1993. They stayed in jail for four nights, and all but one was released with the charges dropped. 


The boys were welcomed back enthusiastically by their schoolmates and families. The sheriff’s department released a statement claiming there wasn’t sufficient evidence to prove that the sexual acts were nonconsensual, though they agreed that the teens’ behavior towards their female peers was troubling. The only charge that remained was one involving a 10-year-old girl.


Didion provides a sketch of the Belman family, from which two Spurs members—Dana and Kristopher—hail. Donald and Dottie Belman, the boys’ parents, grew up in Lakewood and both returned after they were married. Donald was a star athlete in his youth and became a coach for the boys’ Little League teams. Dottie won Mother of the Year for her support of the teams, which dictated their family life. Dottie explains that she used to walk around proudly, but now she must hide her face. During the ordeal, Donald advised his sons on which television interviews to accept. In conversation with Didion, Donald praises his sons as hard workers and star athletes who never got into trouble.


Though Kristopher was released without charges in 1993, he was arraigned months later for another charge involving a 13-year-old girl. The charges were dropped, but he had to do 100 hours of community service. At the same time, Dana was awaiting trial for felony theft charges; he eventually served three years of a 10-year sentence. Dottie filed for divorce in 1993, reflecting that the supports of their all-American family life had crumbled. She recalled Dana wishing they could travel back in time to high school when everything seemed so promising. Didion quotes a passage from “Golden Land,” in which Ira Erwing Jr. laments how his family squandered all the advantages he worked to give them.

Part 2, Chapter 4 Summary

Didion recalls asking her mother about their class and being reprimanded for thinking about such things. She understands that this was a central belief for Californians: There were no definitive classes because California promised that anyone at any time could make it big. 


Throughout her life, Californians still believed this promise, but by the 1980s, the economic downturn caused a crisis of identity, though it took a while to accept. Following the 1987 market crash, Californians felt insulated from its repercussions. Didion recounts a conversation with a real estate broker in western Los Angeles who was not worried about defense cutbacks affecting the market because workers for that plant lived in other neighborhoods. Five years later, the Hughes plant moved its production to Arizona, and the real estate agent had to concede that the market was plummeting. People in Los Angeles also blamed the 1992 riots for their inability to sell a home, rather than acknowledging the fact of economic decline.


Retroactively, Californians highlighted 1989 as the start of the decline, as this is when defense contractors started their major layoffs. Some outfits had a façade of optimism, like McDonnell Douglas who continued to manufacture commercial aircraft. People used euphemistic language to describe these layoffs, which prevented the major urban centers from understanding how such massive money leaving the state affected them. By 1991, approximately 60,000 people lost their jobs as companies moved out of state, where labor was cheaper and less regulated. By 1992, a further 107,000 jobs were lost. Didion shares a newspaper quotation that tries to put a positive spin on the changes, as without big companies, it claims, citizens could be more entrepreneurial.


She shares an anecdote to illustrate how people were desperate for jobs: An oil refinery posted 28 new jobs in their plant, and more than 14,000 people applied in person. Official statistics from the Commission on State Finance estimated total job losses in the early 1990s at nearly 1 million. The Bank of America further predicted several hundreds of thousands of layoffs between 1993 and 1995.

Part 2, Chapter 5 Summary

Aircraft factory line workers believed they were a permanent fixture in California, as their industry worked within such narrow tolerances that they could never become automated. A manager of one of these assembly lines explains that the work is ceaseless action, since they produce these huge machines every few days. The workers in these plants had specific production skills and didn’t concern themselves with the marketability of their industry. 


The major defense contractors subcontracted much of the manufacturing out to others, and oftentimes, since these entities were all working for government contracts, they would “team” together on projects and divide the work. However, Didion claims this interdependence was a hindrance to the industry’s adaptability. For example, in 1991, the secretary of defense cancelled a contract with General Dynamics, but employees of McDonnell Douglas lost their jobs because they were teaming on the project.


Companies were heavily dependent on the goodwill of the government, who were the primary funders of their programs. In another example, Didion depicts how, in 1991, McDonnell Douglas moved most of the production of C-17s from its Lakewood plant to the hometown of a sympathetic senator in Georgia. C-17 production was riddled with extra costs, and the company struggled to produce consistent aircraft without technical issues. McDonnell Douglas delivered the first aircraft to the Air Force in June of 1993, and though Air Force officials publicly lauded the plane, behind the scenes, they were determining how to axe the program.

Part 2, Chapter 6 Summary

Didion shares the results of a Lakewood school district questionnaire for recent graduates in 1989. Most students were continuing education in nearby community colleges, and many of them were in the aerospace technology program. Didion contends that Lakewood didn’t push its children to be ambitious in their schooling or careers; it was more enthusiastic about their sports. One resident describes Lakewood as a giant recreation program meant to keep its citizens busy. 


Didion remembers visiting the Lakewood shopping center, which, though declining in sales, was still a hub. She walked around a store that was going out of business and saw 3-hour-long lines full of women lugging piles of sale items. These consumers, and the men working the tills, were the heirs of that prior generation who moved to Lakewood for new beginnings.

Part 2, Chapter 7 Summary

Didion returns to Henry George’s “What the Railroad Will Bring Us,” here quoting a passage where George lists different kinds of labor exploitation around the world and asks whether Californians are willing to achieve greatness through the same means. 


Back in April 1993 in Lakewood, the 10-year-old survivor of the Spur Posse made her first television appearance. At the same time, Spur members were shopping around their story to talent agencies. Soon after, the Teamsters union went on strike over Douglas’s use of contractors; then, a commercial airline switched suppliers from Douglas to Boeing. In 1997, Douglas dissolved into Boeing, and in the subsequent years, Boeing shut down Douglas’s major manufacturing programs. Boeing proposed a plan to develop the Lakewood plant land into an industrial park with its own housing.


In 2002, development began nearby on the Alameda Corridor, a large transport expressway peppered with warehouses traversing and connecting the “Gateway Cities” to the port of Los Angeles. However, citizens along this corridor didn’t think the casual, low-wage warehouse jobs gave them the same ability to become a property-owning middle class. Didion remembers driving down this corridor in 2002 and seeing empty rail lines and empty warehouses plastered with signs advertising their lease. Also in 2002, Didion saw pleas from the historic Aero Theatre in Santa Monica asking for patrons to help save the structure. Like many of the Gateway Cities, Santa Monica grew because of its connection to Douglas manufacturing. However, when Douglas left, Santa Monica still had the benefits of California’s most beautiful landscapes, where the Gateway Cities only have rows of warehouses.


Didion recalls another time when she worked on a story in Hermiston, Oregon, which was fighting with nearby towns about the disposal of nerve gas. Hermiston wanted to keep the nerve gas because its storage provided hundreds of jobs, even if the material was hazardous. Didion had an epiphany that this sentiment was exactly what founded California: People concerned primarily with their ability to make money, regardless of the harm to others or themselves.

Part 2, Chapters 1-7 Analysis

Didion returns to her examination of The Contradictions of Californian Identity and California’s government dependence through the case study of Lakewood. She first illustrates the promise of Lakewood as the American dream realized: Young families becoming the property-owning middle class, sending their kids to schools and sports leagues while parents worked in the booming aerospace industry and spent their money at Lakewood shopping center. Didion portrays the Douglas plant itself as symbolic of this promise of prosperity, as she continually refers to its “outsized American flag whipping in the wind” and “the MD-11s parked like cars” (103). 


However, underneath this optimistic vision of independence, Didion identifies significantly intense bindings to corporations and the government that restricted how these families could live. Developers targeted young men fresh out of school and starting families, tying them to decades-long mortgages in standardized housing. These families were in turn dependent on the ability of their employers to market themselves to the federal government for manufacturing contracts to keep their projects alive. The statistics of graduates in 1989 still on the whole pursuing aerospace technology programs—even in the wake of hundreds of thousands of layoffs in this field—demonstrates how ingrained the Douglas plant was for life in Lakewood. 


Another contradiction of identity that Didion identifies in these chapters is xenophobia towards outsiders, which introduces the motif of “new people.” Didion defines “new people,” as she heard it used in her childhood, as those “who had moved to California after World War Two, but [the definition] was tacitly extended back to include the migration from the Dust Bowl in the 1930s, and often further” (95). Californians understood themselves in contrast to these new people and believed they had more ties to—and thus claims to—the land. Didion further traces this xenophobia in real-world legislation aimed at “foreign” migrants in California in the late 19th century, which restricted work, schooling, and housing in ways that weren’t applied to their white counterparts. She argues that these laws, as well as the entrenched social racism, was a way for white pioneers to consolidate their new community and build power for their eventual government, all while ignoring the fact that they were colonizers themselves and not native to the region anyway.


The Lakewood case study also connects to The Romanticization of History and the Land, as the Spurs Posse scandal illustrates what can happen when a community refuses to see itself clearly in favor of holding onto a historic identity. At the heart of this scandal, beyond the sexist views of the male teenage defendants, was the misconception that Lakewood was an upper-middle-class community, when really it was peopled with lower-level factory and service industry workers. In conversations with residents, Didion notes that many Lakewood citizens envisioned themselves as members of a higher class than their lifestyles would indicate, and with this skewed perception comes the belief that their community is thus moral, wholesome, and incapable of violence. 


Donald Belman is representative of this attempt to grasp onto the nostalgic past to ignore present-day conflicts. When speaking with Didion, Donald emphasized his sons’ supposed good deeds, particularly their sporting accomplishments, as well as his own standing as an upright citizen to prove that they aren’t the dangerous hooligans the media portrays them as: “I’m a solid guy. Just a solid citizen. I see no reason for any thought that our family isn’t just all-American, basic and down-to-earth” (127). In this conversation, Donald doesn’t acknowledge the irony of making these claims while his sons have outstanding felony charges and pending community service for sexual assault and theft. It is this inability to understand or even acknowledge the root of the community’s issues that led to the emergence of the Spur Posse and the havoc they wreaked.


Didion weaves her own experiences throughout her case study of Lakewood, which helps to inform the conclusions she draws about their place in the larger California identity. Drawing upon The Role of Personal Experience in Shaping Political Understanding, several key moments from Didion’s life increase her awareness of the faulty Californian self-perception. First, Didion recalls a memorable conversation with her mother that exposed her early on to the myth of California as a “classless” society, one where great wealth was always attainable. Didion asks her mother what their class is, and her mother responds, “It’s not a word we use […] It’s not the way we think” (129). Such refusal to recognize class structures makes it easier for people like Didion’s family to avoid acknowledging their privileges in comparison to others, while also making exploitative labor structures and the struggles of the working class—such as the many thousands of laid-off workers Didion acknowledges after the plant closures—harder to address. 


Conversations in her adulthood echo this earlier interaction with her mother, as people like the real estate agent refuse to admit that the state’s depleting industry was the primary reason for the housing market crash, not the brief blip of civil unrest in 1992. Later in this section, Didion recalls a moment in Oregon that gave her an epiphany about the foundations of the Californian speculative identity. In the citizens of Hermiston’s refusal to give up the nerve gas storage plant, Didion sees California’s, and her own family’s, long history of seeking easy money, even if the work was harmful: “Members of my family had been moving through places in the same spirit of careless self-interest and optimism that now seemed to be powering this argument in Hermiston” (151). She sees the same opportunism in Lakewood. The residents latch onto the Douglas plant because it’s the booming business at the time, not considering that the company is only present in the community until money can be made elsewhere. As soon as business becomes too expensive in California, the McDonnell Douglas moves to where the labor is cheaper and less regulated.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 56 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs