History Matters

David McCullough

History Matters

David McCullough
61 pages2-hour read
Nonfiction
Essay Collection
Adult
Published in 2025

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of antisemitism (specifically, Holocaust denial).

Part 3: “Influences”

Part 3, Essay 10 Summary: “The Love of Learning”

McCullough considered his Yale undergraduate years studying English and painting among the most formative of his life. In 2006, he was invited to speak for the “Yale Tomorrow” fundraising campaign. His speech focused on three early Yale figures; his research into these men led him to write The Pioneers (2019), an outcome he attributed to his belief in the value of curiosity and his conviction that one thing leads to another.


The speech frames the love of learning through three Connecticut-born, 18th-century polymaths.


Reverend Dr. Ezra Stiles, Yale’s seventh president, kept the small, financially fragile institution alive during the Revolutionary War and began its transformation into a university. A linguist, astronomer, and president of the Connecticut Society for the Abolition of Slavery, he was widely considered the most learned man in America. His 1771 portrait by Samuel King was staged at Stiles’s direction with the subject surrounded by books including Isaac Newton’s Principia (1687), Plato, and an astronomical chart, distilling his scholarly identity. Stiles died in office in 1795.


Colonel John Trumbull, aide to General Washington and a patriot-artist, donated nearly 100 paintings to Yale in exchange for a $1,000 annual annuity. The Trumbull Art Gallery he designed was the first campus museum in the nation. A childhood accident left him with one functioning eye, making him particularly skilled at small, jewel-like work. For his most famous work, Declaration of Independence, he traveled at his own expense to paint the signers from life, ensuring accurate likenesses. His remains and those of his wife, Sarah, now lie in the Art Gallery’s basement beneath his portrait of George Washington.


Dr. Manasseh Cutler, Yale class of 1765, had three doctorates and careers as a botanist, a congressman, and an army chaplain. His most consequential act was co-drafting and lobbying for the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which established governance for five future states and permanently banned slavery within them before the Constitution existed. With General Rufus Putnam, Cutler co-founded the Ohio Company and secured a 5-million-acre land grant; his advocacy for reserved university land produced Ohio University in 1805, whose first building bears his name. 


McCullough praises all three as models of purposeful lives. He closes by reading Cutler’s diary entry of July 3, 1787, describing a return visit to Yale. The entry catalogues Yale’s meager scientific equipment—a rusted telescope, an ancient microscope, and “a miserable electrical machine” (110)—and notes that a handsome sum was being collected for proper apparatus. McCullough toasts the act of giving, which the evening is geared towards.

Part 3, Essay 11 Summary: “Tribute to Vincent Scully”

McCullough loved school from childhood and often told his family about influential teachers from the Linden School, Shady Side, and Yale, including Miss Mavis Bridgewater, Lowell Innes, Carl Cochran, Deane Keller, Rocky Flint, and above all Vincent Scully, Yale’s legendary art history professor who, McCullough said, opened his eyes to architecture and to the possibilities of teaching as performance. In 1999, McCullough delivered the inaugural address for the Vincent Scully Prize at the National Building Museum in Washington, DC, with Scully present in the audience.


Speaking as a friend and former student of more than 40 years, McCullough recalls his first class with Scully in his junior fall of 1953, which opened with a lecture on Stonehenge. McCullough had never experienced anything comparable in 14 years as a student. Two smaller moments linger equally: Scully pausing at the Strathcona tower at sunset to note that light is the architect’s true building material, and Scully making time to read a book McCullough had recommended—a gesture McCullough considered the greatest compliment a teacher could offer. Drawing on a child development professor’s observation that attitudes are caught, not taught, McCullough argues that Scully’s genius was showing students what he loved and letting them absorb it. He closes by calling Scully an extraordinary American who teaches simultaneously through heart and mind.

Part 3, Essay 12 Summary: “Getting Through to Schlesinger”

This personal essay was written after US President John F. Kennedy’s assassination in November 1963; it recounts McCullough’s response to Kennedy’s campaign. Moved by Kennedy’s election, the then-27-year-old left Time Inc. and moved his family to Washington to edit a USIA magazine for Middle Eastern readers under Edward R. Murrow.


During the 1960 campaign, McCullough becomes convinced that a Richard Nixon victory would be a national disaster and develops an idea for the Kennedy camp. Working in Time’s promotion department without editorial contacts, he has no path to the candidate. Colleague Mary Tweedy suggests reaching Arthur Schlesinger, Kennedy’s primary speechwriter, who is staying at the Carlyle Hotel in Boston. Already traveling to Boston to see his wife after the birth of their third child, McCullough calls directly and Schlesinger agrees to meet.


McCullough meets Schlesinger in his Harvard library office on the afternoon of the Harvard-Dartmouth football game. Feeling out of his depth, McCullough spends 15 minutes arguing that Nixon appeals to voters’ fears while Kennedy appeals to their courage and conviction. Schlesinger tells him the idea has merit and asks for a speech. McCullough writes it over three nights, finding the work unexpectedly effortless. Schlesinger returns an edited copy with a brief note suggesting McCullough’s work will be used in the campaign. On the Saturday before Election Day, Kennedy delivers a Chicago speech containing one sentence written by McCullough.


Two postscripts follow. First, Mary Tweedy reports that the story influenced some friends’ votes by demonstrating Kennedy’s accessibility. Second, in February 1961, McCullough is hired at the USIA by deputy director Don Wilson. The day after Kennedy’s assassination, Wilson asks him to assemble a multilingual memorial magazine. After securing contributions from historian Allan Nevins and journalist William S. White, McCullough calls Schlesinger at home on Thanksgiving Day; Schlesinger agrees and delivers an article by the deadline. McCullough never learns whether Schlesinger connected him with the young man from the 1960 campaign.

Part 3, Essay 13 Summary: “Tribute to Paul Horgan”

In a 1985 speech at Washington College in Chestertown, Maryland, McCullough honors his friend and mentor Paul Horgan, a remarkable individual of multiple talents: novelist, historian, and painter.


McCullough surveys decades of critical praise: The 1935 debut novel No Quarter Given was acclaimed by Seán Ó Faoláin and the London Observer; the Pulitzer Prize-winning Great River (1954), a four-century chronicle of the Rio Grande, was called a major masterpiece by Carl Carmer; and A Distant Trumpet (1960) was hailed by The New York Times as the finest novel of the Southwest. Fellow writers Leon Edel, Walker Percy, and Wallace Stegner contribute additional praise. Horgan’s social circle included the Wyeth family, Frank Capra, J. Robert Oppenheimer, Igor Stravinsky, and Edmund Wilson; Henriette Wyeth Hurd described him as someone who is always giving.


Born in Buffalo in 1903, Horgan moved to New Mexico at 12 when his father’s tuberculosis required a dry climate. After his father’s death, he went to the Eastman School of Music in Rochester, New York, ultimately choosing writing because it alone could accommodate his gifts for painting, music, and acting simultaneously. Rouben Mamoulian and N. C. Wyeth were the formative influences of that period. Despite holding 20 honorary degrees, Horgan never attended college. His more than 40 published books have earned two Pulitzer Prizes.


McCullough identifies courage, community, the play of East against West, and an obsession with light as Horgan’s recurring themes, and reads passages from Great River on Spanish explorers and King Charles of Spain to demonstrate Horgan’s lyrical precision. McCullough identifies empathy as Horgan’s greatest gift, calling him a self-taught, profoundly moral writer who has raised historical writing to the level of literature.

Part 3, Essay 14 Summary: “Accuracy and Imagination—Tribute to Herman Wouk”

In a 1995 speech celebrating novelist Herman Wouk’s 80th birthday at the Library of Congress, McCullough argues there is no firm boundary between the historical novelist and the historian: Both must render the past with feeling. He borrows 19th-century French painter Eugène Delacroix’s formulation of “accuracy for the sake of imagination” (132) as his governing principle.


McCullough imagines a temporary exhibit in the Capitol’s Statuary Hall dedicated to the statues of imaginary figures from American literary history; some of these would be Wouk’s characters. He also singles out Armin von Roon, Wouk’s fictional German historian, as doing some of the most vivid historical writing he has encountered.


McCullough then turns to historical illiteracy in contemporary America. His visit to Union College with Tom Brokaw revealed students who knew about the Holocaust but little of WWII itself; a Dartmouth seminar found history majors who had never heard of 20th-century statesman George Marshall. A physician McCullough met on a flight who doubted the Holocaust occurred deepens his concern. 


McCullough credits Thornton Wilder’s interview in the Paris Review for teaching him to write about the past without eliminating its sense of contingency, and identifies narrative history as the most intellectually honest form.


He acknowledges three heroes in the audience: Wouk himself; diplomat Sol Linowitz, who let him see history in the making during the Panama Canal treaty controversy; and historian Dan Boorstin, who showed him the role of ideas in history. McCullough then reveals two personal debts to Wouk: The Caine Mutiny (1951) sustained him through a hated factory job in college, and Wouk’s character Victor “Pug” Henry, who is always present at pivotal moments, suggested the approach McCullough would take with his biography of Harry Truman. A visit to the Truman Library confirmed the fit. He closes by calling Wouk a patriot.

Part 3, Essay 15 Summary: “Favorite and Influential Books”

McCullough was a habitual list-maker. Two lists record his most influential and favorite reading.


His annotated selections include: Ben and Me (1939) by Robert Lawson, which brought history to life for him at about age 10; A Night to Remember (1955) by Walter Lord, from whom he learned the craft of narrative writing; The Trees (1940) by Conrad Richter, which sparked a friendship and lessons in storytelling; The Proud Tower (1965) by Barbara Tuchman, a recurring inspiration while he wrote The Johnstown Flood; A Stillness at Appomattox (1953) by Bruce Catton, which first ignited his interest in the Civil War; The Killer Angels (1974) by Michael Shaara as a model of historical fiction; and The Autocrat of the Breakfast-Table (1858) by Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. as a reminder that history extends well beyond politics and war. 


A second composite list adds works by Willa Cather, Patrick O’Brian, Flannery O’Connor, Gore Vidal, and Wallace Stegner, among others.

Part 3, Essay 16 Summary: “A Book on Every Bed”

From the early 1990s onward McCullough faced a constant flood of requests for his time, most of which he declined. In 1995, he was delighted by an invitation from the Boston bookstore Waterstone’s to write something for their Christmas newsletter.


McCullough describes the Christmas tradition his parents established at the family home in Pittsburgh: Each of the four McCullough boys woke on Christmas morning to find a beautifully wrapped book at the foot of his bed. The implicit arrangement was that the children would read quietly, granting their parents extra sleep—a logic McCullough later recognized as wise. He carried the tradition into his own household, placing books by the beds of all five of his children. He found particular pleasure in the late-night task of choosing and sneaking titles into darkened rooms, often revisiting childhood favorites such as The Little Engine That Could (1930), Mr. Popper’s Penguins (1938), and Paddle-to-the-Sea (1941), while also discovering new ones. He became so absorbed in Elizabeth Speare’s The Witch of Blackbird Pond (1958), chosen for his oldest daughter, that he read nearly the whole book before wrapping it. He closes with a direct recommendation: Give a child a book at the foot of the bed on Christmas morning.

Part 3 Analysis

McCullough demonstrates his conviction that historical writing must utilize the tools of literary fiction to achieve deeper truths. In his tributes to Paul Horgan and Herman Wouk, McCullough positions merging factual accuracy and emotional empathy as the ultimate goal of the historian. He borrows a foundational principle from the journal of the painter Eugène Delacroix, who demanded “accuracy for the sake of imagination” (132), to argue that biographers and novelists share the same mandate to render the past with profound feeling. Furthermore, his annotated reading list cites historical fiction, such as Michael Shaara’s The Killer Angels (1974) and Conrad Richter’s The Trees (1940), as primary influences on his own narrative style. By elevating historical novelists alongside traditional academics, McCullough rejects the rigid boundaries of conventional historiography. He argues that chronicling geopolitical facts without reconstructing the internal, human perspectives of the participants produces an incomplete and fundamentally flawed record. This approach aligns with a broader mid-to-late 20th-century shift toward narrative history, wherein writers prioritize storytelling mechanics and character-driven plots to rescue historical events from academic obscurity and to combat the pervasive historical ignorance McCullough observes in modern university students.


McCullough utilizes the motif of the polymath to illustrate his ideal of American intellectual vitality and civic engagement. In “The Love of Learning,” he structures his 2006 Yale fundraising address around three 18th-century figures who collectively mastered theology, painting, botany, linguistics, and political governance. He notes, for instance, that Manasseh Cutler combined three doctorates with a career as an army chaplain and a botanist before lobbying for the Northwest Ordinance. Similarly, his tribute to Paul Horgan highlights the writer’s simultaneous talents in singing, set design, acting, painting, and historical research. McCullough focuses on these multifaceted individuals to suggest that true intellectual achievement defies narrow specialization and requires boundless curiosity. By presenting figures who seamlessly cross boundaries between art, hard science, and national politics, he frames history as an inherently interconnected discipline. This mirrors McCullough’s own interdisciplinary approach to biographical research, in which understanding a historical actor requires an appreciation for the entirety of their varied, often contradictory passions.


The inclusion of autobiographical essays alongside historical tributes emphasizes individual agency within larger, unpredictable historical moments, playing into the theme of Contingency Over Inevitability. In “Getting Through to Schlesinger,” McCullough recounts his youthful, improbable success in delivering a political argument to John F. Kennedy’s 1960 presidential campaign. A self-described anonymous voter, the young McCullough managed to secure a meeting with speechwriter Arthur Schlesinger Jr. After successfully pitching a contrast between Richard Nixon’s politics of fear and Kennedy’s politics of courage, he saw a tiny extract of his phrasing delivered in a crucial Chicago speech. This personal anecdote offers a valuable counterpoint to his tribute to Wouk, where he credits Thornton Wilder for teaching him to write about the past without eliminating the reality that “no one ever knew how things would turn out” (133). The Schlesinger anecdote serves as a practical microcosm of this: A 27-year-old magazine marketer unexpectedly shaped a presidential address. By insisting on the unpredictability of the past, McCullough challenges determinist views of history, demanding that biographers place themselves inside the tense present moment of their subjects.


These essays frequently return to education, portraying the transmission of knowledge as an intimate, emotional inheritance. In his 1999 tribute to Vincent Scully, McCullough recalls a child development professor observing that “attitudes are caught not taught” (113). He argues that Scully succeeded as a professor by passionately performing his love for architecture in front of his Yale students, allowing them to absorb his reverence for light and structure. This concept of modeled enthusiasm is domesticated in “A Book on Every Bed,” where McCullough details his family’s Christmas tradition of leaving wrapped books at the foot of children’s beds. Both scenarios remove education from institutional instruction, positioning it instead as an act of quiet, intellectual generosity. Scully pausing to admire the Strathcona tower at sunset and McCullough’s midnight placement of The Witch of Blackbird Pond (1958) are gestures of passing down cultural appreciation. McCullough’s argues that when individuals authentically model their enthusiasms for the next generation, they forge a dynamic that sustains civic institutions and public historical awareness.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 61 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs