A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summaries & Analyses
Quizzes
Reading Tools
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death, animal death, physical abuse, emotional abuse, gender discrimination, suicidal ideation, and cursing.
In 1968, Frances discovers that the Torrence family documents have been removed from Vera’s red handbag, leaving only medical records. Ford suggests that they speak with Elaine, theorizing that a message from a constable mentioning her must be significant. Frances agrees, revealing that her professor confirmed that Max submitted a different paper than the one Elaine claimed to have written for him; Frances now believes that Elaine was trying to set Max up for academic misconduct as revenge for the nude painting he made of her.
A policewoman then arrives to take Frances in for questioning about Vera’s murder. Ford insists on legal representation, but the officer states that Frances must come alone. When Frances refuses to comply, the officer arrests her on suspicion of murder. In the police car, an emotional Frances considers her fortune, which warned her that “slow demise begins right when you hold the queen in the palm of your hand” (186). She now connects this to holding Vera’s diamond tiara and fears that her downfall has begun.
In the present, Annie confronts Laura for allowing Sam back into her life. Laura explains that years of isolation and guilt over her lies about Vera’s paintings made her vulnerable when Sam reappeared. He had contacted her after seeing Annie’s inheritance in the news. Annie is skeptical, as Sam never tried to contact her before.
Crane theorizes that Sam might have killed Fliss to protect Laura’s secret and then fled, which would explain the abandoned paintings. However, this doesn’t account for the continued threats. They decide that their next step is to investigate the Knightsbridge gallery. As they prepare to leave, Annie examines Fliss’s phone records and is shocked to discover nine calls between her and Crane in the weeks before her death, which shatters Annie’s trust in him.
On their way to the gallery, Crane arranges a detour to University College Hospital, where a pathologist friend named Kabir reviews Vera’s cold case file. Kabir finds an overlooked detail in the autopsy: a sign of heavy-metal poisoning that should have warranted further testing. He posits that Vera might have been dead before her heart was removed, a finding that could overturn her husband’s conviction. Crane says that he’ll seek an exhumation order, and Kabir agrees to write it up. As Annie photographs the other medical records from Vera’s handbag, she makes an important discovery: Every one of the deceased patients was listed as having “no fixed abode” (200), revealing that they were all unhoused.
In 1968, Frances is taken to the police station. While she waits, she sees Elaine, who is unsurprised by the arrest and cryptically mentions that someone was practicing surgical skills on “pieces of meat” (222). She warns Frances that powerful people will kill to protect Vera’s secrets. Elaine admits that her attempt to set Max up for academic misconduct was clumsy. She then tries to discredit Vera, claiming that she had a “personality disorder” and considered dying by suicide, recounting a story about an attempt involving sleeping pills and a cellar.
As Frances is called for her interrogation, she kneels to help Elaine collect books that have spilled from her satchel. Among them is a copy of The Bell Jar, and Frances, remembering the book, realizes that Elaine’s story about Vera’s attempt to die by suicide was plagiarized directly from the novel.
In the present, Annie asks Crane about his calls on Fliss’s phone records. He apologizes for his lack of transparency, explaining that the calls were not romantic; Fliss was connected to a traumatic event from his past, and he hadn’t been ready to discuss it.
An anonymous woman then calls Crane, claiming to be a police administrator and requesting the return of Vera’s file. Crane and Annie suspect that the caller is an imposter—the lead detective on Fliss’s case is female, and whoever is calling doesn’t seem to know this—and Crane plays along casually. They agree to meet her at a pub, where they instead find Brian Folkestone, a retired police officer. He reveals that he’s behind the phone call and says that they will want to hear what he has to say.
Brian denies killing Vera but admits that his hands are not entirely clean. He explains that his sister, Susan, was unhoused and died on Dr. Alasdair Huntington’s operating table. Brian overheard the surgeon speaking callously about his unhoused patients, and he later learned from Vera that her husband was using them to test unapproved, high-risk surgical techniques, believing that society wouldn’t miss them. Vera and Brian planned to expose him, but she was murdered first.
After Dr. Huntington was imprisoned for Vera’s murder, Brian was hired to kill him. Brian confesses that he went to the prison and gave the doctor a small bottle of whiskey laced with arsenic, telling him that it was a gift from Max Torrence with the message, “This is for Vera” (221).
In 1968, during her interrogation, detectives show Frances photos of steaks with complex sutures that were found in her unlocked apartment. They accuse her of practicing to imitate Dr. Huntington’s surgical methods. Frances points out how absurd the evidence is and suggests that they investigate Max Torrence instead. The police reveal that Elaine told them to search the apartment.
Frances’s lawyer successfully argues that the evidence is inadmissible, and she is released. Before she leaves, a detective mentions that Dr. Huntington confirmed that the stitches on Vera’s body were a perfect copy of his own. However, Dr. Huntington never actually saw the body; it was formally identified by Max, after which it was buried.
In the present,, Crane reasons that if Max had Dr. Huntington killed, he must have believed that the doctor murdered Vera—or feared that the doctor was getting close to uncovering who really killed her and might appeal his conviction. Crane gets a lead on Dr. Huntington’s nurse Marie Cavanaugh, whom Brian mentioned, and discovers that she now works at the Knightsbridge Nymph Art Gallery.
Annie insists on accompanying Crane to the gallery, arguing that her knowledge of Frances’s diary is essential. There, they find that all of Fliss’s sculptures have been removed. They question Marie, who is evasive about her past with Dr. Huntington but becomes visibly alarmed when Annie identifies herself as Laura Adams’s daughter. As they leave, Annie sees Marie in the shadows outside, glaring at them.
In 1968, after being released, Frances tells Ford that they must find Max. Suspecting a cover-up related to Max identifying Vera’s body, Frances goes to a university lecture she knows he will attend. During the class, a newspaper is passed through the aisles, causing a commotion. Max grabs it and reads the front page. Frances sees that his family’s corruption has been publicly exposed and understands that Max’s downfall is now inevitable.
In the present, an elderly woman arrives at Laura’s home in Chelsea to see Annie. She introduces herself as Elaine Torrence, Max’s ex-wife. She admits to reading Frances’s diary years ago and claims that she was threatened by Dr. Huntington’s associates into planting the sutured steaks in Frances’s apartment, but she also says that she did a clumsy job on purpose so that Frances would be exonerated. Elaine shares a disturbing detail about Vera: Beginning in childhood, she developed a recurring habit of removing the hearts from animals that her cat killed and leaving them for Max to find.
Just then, Crane arrives with news that Vera’s body is being exhumed. While he and Annie are talking, Elaine disappears. She has left behind two old photographs—one of Dr. Huntington with Marie Cavanaugh and another of Vera with Marie. Annie also discovers that Vera’s last painting, titled Bleeding Heart, has been stolen from the counter.
Annie realizes that the stolen painting must be “the heart kept in darkness” from her fortune (251). Crane notes that Elaine couldn’t have known about the animal heart left on their doorstep, as that information wasn’t public, and wonders who Laura could have told—with suspicion pointing toward Sam. Annie finds Laura in her studio, where she explains that her new collection is called the “Black Heart series” (254)—a tribute to Vera. Annie forgives her mother for her years of deception. Meanwhile, Crane texts Annie to report that both Max and Elaine have been arrested for attempting to stop the exhumation of Vera’s body.
In these chapters, the two timelines continue to intersect as Annie makes progress on the investigation into Vera’s death. Her discovery that Dr. Huntington’s surgical victims were all listed as having “of no fixed abode” transforms a series of seemingly unrelated deaths into a pattern of systemic abuse (200). This discovery refocuses the investigation into Vera’s murder, revealing that it may not be an isolated act of passion but instead the consequence of uncovering a horrific secret rooted in the Exploitation of Vulnerable Populations. Brian Folkestone’s account of his sister Susan’s death personalizes this abstract injustice. While overhearing Dr. Huntington refer to her and other patients as “whores” whom paramedics shouldn’t bother reviving, Brian witnesses the dehumanization that enables the doctor’s atrocities. This moment grounds the plot in the historical reality of 1960s London, where the celebrated youth culture of the “Swinging Sixties” coexisted with a severe crisis for unhoused people. By targeting marginalized people whose disappearances he believed wouldn’t prompt investigation, Dr. Huntington operates with impunity. The narrative highlights institutional complicity, where the very language of official records becomes a tool for erasing victims and allowing a powerful man to treat human beings as disposable material for his experiments.
Brian’s confession that he murdered Dr. Huntington in prison on Max’s behalf continues to develop the novel’s exploration of the moral landscape of extralegal retribution and The Ethics of Vigilante Justice. Having witnessed the justice system’s failure to hold the doctor accountable for his crimes, Brian took matters into his own hands, circumventing a corrupt system to enact what he perceived as a more definitive form of punishment. His initial collaboration with Vera to expose the doctor, followed by his later decision to kill him, illustrates a progression from seeking institutional accountability to embracing personal vengeance. The act itself is morally clouded; the message he delivered with the poisoned whisky, “This is for Vera” (221), frames the murder as an act of loyalty, yet the fact that he was paid by Max introduces a mercenary element that complicates any claims of pure motivation. The ultimate irony is that Dr. Huntington was imprisoned for a crime he may not have committed while his systemic atrocities went unpunished by law. Brian’s action was a direct response to this perversion of justice, suggesting a world where power allows characters to operate by their own rules, blurring the line between righteous vengeance and cold-blooded murder.
Across both timelines, Elaine’s actions demonstrate her unreliability by how she influences both investigations. In 1968, Frances discovers Elaine’s unreliability when she realizes that her anecdote about Vera’s attempt to die by suicide has been plagiarized from Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar. This is a calculated act of narrative theft, designed to discredit Vera and seize control of her story. This pattern of duplicity persists into the present, where an older Elaine visits Annie under the guise of allyship, only to steal Vera’s last painting. Her confession about being forced to plant the sutured steaks in Frances’s apartment is another carefully crafted narrative that positions her as a reluctant accomplice. This performance reflects Elaine’s strategy for survival in a world dominated by manipulative men like Max.
The symbols of the red handbag, Vera’s paintings, and animal hearts intersect in these chapters to represent the violent secrets at the core of the mystery. The section opens with the discovery that important documents have been removed from Vera’s red handbag, reflecting its status as a container for truths that powerful figures want to suppress. This is mirrored when Elaine steals the Bleeding Heart canvas, a painting that Annie links to the prophecy of “the heart kept in darkness” (251). Both the bag and the canvas are tangible manifestations of Vera’s story; the fight to possess or conceal them is a proxy war over her legacy. The symbol of the animal hearts is further complicated by Elaine’s revelation that they echo Vera’s childhood method of psychological warfare against Max, connecting this struggle for narrative control to a tangible threat of violence. It foreshadows the surgical removal of Vera’s own heart and emphasizes the predatory dynamics within her family. In response, Laura’s new art collection, the Black Heart series, becomes a powerful counternarrative—an act of defiance that reclaims the heart to honor Vera’s suppressed identity rather than erase it.
The novel’s dual-timeline structure continues to draw parallels between Frances’s and Annie’s investigations, stressing how patterns of manipulation and betrayal repeat across generations. Frances is arrested based on evidence planted by Elaine, a woman she tentatively considered a friend, forcing her to confront the unreliability of her social circle. In the present, Annie’s trust in her primary ally, Crane, is shattered when she discovers his undisclosed phone calls with Fliss, revealing a calculated omission that mirrors other characters’ more overt deceptions. Both protagonists are forced to recalibrate their understanding of who they can trust while navigating webs of lies spun by characters like Elaine and Sam. This structural parallelism culminates in moments of irony, such as when Frances sits in a lecture on fratricide just as news of the Torrence family’s corruption breaks. The academic content of her studies collides with the brutal reality of her life, collapsing the distance between theory and experience. This technique reinforces the novel’s contention that the psychological drivers of crime—greed, jealousy, and the abuse of power—are timeless forces that ensnare each generation anew.



Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.
By Kristen Perrin