50 pages • 1-hour read
Karen ArmstrongA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summaries & Analyses
Reading Tools
Armstrong asserts that European societies were able to achieve political hegemony through the innovation of capitalism, which “enabled the West to reproduce its resources indefinitely, so that Western society was no longer subject to the same constraints as an agrarian culture” (163). This economic system, she goes on to assert, made secularist European societies open to change in a way that pre-capitalist agrarian societies (like those in the Islamic world) were not. As Europeans began colonizing other cultures, the world order shifted, and Islam suddenly found itself in a defensive political position. Muslims struggled to make sense of this historical turn of events; what did it mean about the spiritual wellbeing of the ummah? Islamic thinkers quickly started trying to adapt to the modernization that had been forced on them, but reconciling the Islamic approach to politics as inherently religious with the secularist government structures of the colonial governments would prove profoundly difficult.
In the aftermath of European colonialism, Islamic cultures have been forcibly secularized. In Egypt, secularist president Gamal Abdel Nasser (1954-1970) pursued Islamic political groups with ruthless violence. In Iraq, the secularist monarchy dismantled Shariah, ripped the head coverings off religious women, killed peaceful protesters, and secretly tortured dissenters. Like secularism, nationalistic movements resulted in extreme violence throughout the Islamic world. Western support for authoritarian secularists and nationalists has been received by Muslim populations as highly hypocritical, undermining any sense of trust that might have existed between The West and the Islamic world. As a result of this political turmoil, fundamentalist movements have gained popularity. Armstrong asserts, however, that, “The fact that Muslims have not yet found an ideal polity for the twentieth century does not mean that Islam is incompatible with modernity” (184).
Armstrong defines fundamentalism as a phenomenon that has occurred across religious traditions in response to modern societal developments, particularly the introduction of secularism. As secularist thinkers become more extreme in their ideology, fundamentalists pursue increasingly regressive social policies in an attempt to restore their religions to a “pure,” or “original” state. Muslim fundamentalism emerged in response to the violent brutality of colonial and postcolonial governments, which imposed a secular European approach to politics on Muslim populations that had considered politics a religious sphere for hundreds of years. Key Muslim fundamentalists discussed by Armstrong include Pakistani extremist Abul Ala Mawdudi (1903-1979), who introduced the notion that jihad was a central tenet of Islam, and Sayyid Qutb (1906-1966), who preached that a violent jihad should even be carried out against politicians who practiced Islam in their private lives but who committed themselves to a secular approach to politics. In Iran, the fundamentalist Shia Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini (1902-89) declared a fatwah against author Salman Rushdie for his book The Satanic Verses. Despite these prominent extremists, however, most Muslims continue to practice a nonviolent, tolerant form of Islam.
In the modern era, many Muslims live as members of a minority group in European societies. Westerners, Armstrong argues, treat their Muslim neighbors with a suspicion not applied to other religious groups. She claims that at the time of writing, Muslim Americans were treated more kindly than Muslim Europeans, despite an American cultural fixation on the Nation of Islam, which was made famous by civil rights leader Malcom X. In South Asia, the memory of the partition between India and Pakistan motivates continued hostility between Hindus and Muslims. Armstrong concludes that “fear and oppression have distorted the faith” (199).
Anti-muslim stereotypes in the Western zeitgeist have existed since the time of the Crusades, when Muslims were vilified as violent monsters who needed to be driven away from the Holy Land. Armstrong argues that repressive secular colonial and postcolonial politics have driven some extremist Muslim groups to behave in violent ways that confirm the preexisting biases of those inclined to treat Muslims with malice. In order to achieve a less hostile future, Armstrong argues that Muslims must be given the space to form modern governments on their own terms, and Westerners must resist the hateful ideologies that have motivated them to suppress Muslims in the past.
Unlike previous sections of the book, which dealt entirely in history, Part 5 deals with events that were in recent memory at the time Armstrong was writing Islam: A Short History. As such, this section is more explicitly rooted in Armstrong’s personal opinions and moral values than other areas of the text. This is especially true of the final chapter, in which Armstrong offers a vision for what people can do in order to achieve a more peaceful future. The final words of the book encapsulate this advisory tone well:
aWestern people must become aware that it is in their interests too that Islam remains healthy and strong. The West has not been wholly responsible for the extreme forms of Islam, which have cultivated a violence that violates the most sacred canons of religion. But the West has certainly contributed to this development and, to assuage the fear and despair that lies at the root of all fundamentalist vision, should cultivate a more accurate appreciation of Islam in the third Christian millennium (208).
This closing statement directly articulates The Importance of Debunking Misconceptions About Islam. In directly addressing Christians (referring to the 21st century as the “third Christian millennium”), Armstrong makes it clear one final time that they are her intended audience, and that she is writing from a Christian perspective herself. Even though Armstrong no longer practiced organized Christianity at the time of writing this book, the influence of Christian worldviews is evident in its content. She frequently treats the terms “Western” and “Christian” as essentially synonymous, a habit that sometimes obscures the religious and cultural diversity of North America and Europe. In the years since Islam: A Short History was published, this Christian-centric way of writing about European and North American cultures, has been increasingly challenged by new scholarship. Nevertheless, by using this framing, Armstrong makes it extremely clear who she is writing the book for, and therefore who she wants to give advice to.
In general, this section is highly critical of Western nations’ involvement (both direct and indirect) in Islamic politics during the modern era. Armstrong seeks to contextualize the violent extremism of groups like the Taliban, and in order to do so, she has to address the impact of Western colonialism and neo-colonialism as another of the External Influences on Islamic Thought, Politics, and Culture. She makes clear that Islam is no more likely to produce violence than other religions and reiterates her view that fundamentalism is a pitfall of all religions in the modern era. Tonally, therefore, this section is distinct from those that came before, as Armstrong attempts to balance political commentary and historical analysis. By the end of Islam: A Short History, readers are left with a clear sense of Armstrong’s own feelings about many of the questions she has raised throughout the book regarding religion’s role in politics, multiculturalism, and hostility between religious groups in the modern era.



Unlock all 50 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.