On Wings of Blood

Briar Boleyn

On Wings of Blood

Briar Boleyn
65 pages2-hour read
Fiction
Novel
Adult
Published in 2024

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death, physical abuse, and emotional abuse.

Manufacturing History to Perpetuate Injustice

In On Wings of Blood, author Briar Boleyn shows the central role that official history, myths, and narratives play in perpetuating a rigid, cruel class system. The very basis of the division between highblood vampires and mortal blightborns is a history that establishes the weakness of mortals and the nobility of vampires. Since the official origin myths of Sangratha position blightborns as helpless victims and highbloods as saviors, the blightborns stop questioning the “natural” superiority of the ruling order. It takes the outsider protagonist, Medra, to expose the interdependence of official history and injustice. Her clear-eyed perspective unpacks how a hierarchy is sustained through manufactured ideologies and institutionalized violence.


The highblood-dominated society of Sangratha is built on a foundational myth that recasts predation as a benevolent order. This ideology is most clearly articulated by Professor Hassan when he recounts sagas like the Great Famine and the Blight of Shadows, in which highbloods are positioned as saviors who rescued mortals from extinction. Hassan’s narrative frames the blightborns’ subservience as a debt owed for their survival. By accepting the label of “blightborn,” mortals internalize their inferiority, making them complicit in a system that thrives on their exploitation. This state-sanctioned history provides the moral framework for the highbloods’ predatory entitlement. However, Medra immediately sees the many gaps and logical fallacies in Hassan’s version of history, such as a convenient danger arising every hundred years to threaten the mortals, requiring them to be saved by the highbloods. Medra senses that the story is one-sided, noting to herself that “it [i]s all propaganda […] that most of Sangratha accept[s] as truth” (81).


The twisted, one-sided version of history provides cover for institutions that formally commodify blightborn bodies. The most extreme example is the Adoration Rite, a secret ceremony where a blightborn woman is ritually sacrificed, her lifeblood used as magical fuel to power the coercive spell that keeps Veilmar’s mortal population compliant. The narrative suggests that the Rite is possible because of the cover of the story of the Bloodmaiden. Because the Bloodmaiden supposedly spilled her blood to save her family, the notion that blood is a precious commodity is reinforced. The “sacrifice” of the young woman who was the Bloodmaiden is seen as “noble,” and the official version masks the problematic history lurking behind the myth. The myth of sacrifice normalizes cruelty in other ways as well, such as the acceptance of thralls—mortals blood-bonded into servitude—and sellbloods, who sell their blood in brothels like The Drained Rose. The novel suggests that official histories and myths make it easy to believe that violence is sacrifice, thus enabling the use of the mortal body as a disposable resource for highblood superiors. To dismantle the cruel social structure of Sangrathan society, the text suggests that characters must see the hidden histories lying beyond official narratives.

Free Will Versus an Imposed Fate

The novel’s stratified milieu presents identity as an inescapable fate determined by bloodline, physical traits, and one’s designated role within the rigid social order. Medra is continually stripped of her free will and agency as others define her purpose for her, labeling her as “blightborn,” “dragon rider,” and “consort.” Medra’s journey is a constant struggle against her fated roles, suggesting that free will is a complex concept in a world dominated by inequalities.


From the moment of her arrival in Sangratha, Medra’s identity is decided for her based on her appearance. Before she can speak a word, her red hair and pointed ears mark her as a “rider,” a lineage tied to the long-dead dragons. In the Black Keep, Lord Viktor Drakharrow analyzes her physical form before the entire court, detailing how her “lean, streamlined physique” and bone structure make her suitable for riding dragons (40). Her personhood is irrelevant; her value is determined solely by how her body aligns with the highbloods’ historical prophecies and needs.


The system’s disregard for individual will is further demonstrated through the magical and political forces that seal Medra’s fate. Without her consent, Viktor performs a public binding ritual, magically linking her to Blake. With the words, “What is bound cannot be unbound” (44), Medra’s role as Blake’s betrothed consort is made irrevocable. Her forced entry into the deadly Consort Games is a direct consequence of the imposed role of the consort, trapping her in a life-or-death struggle based entirely on a position she never accepted.


The system encroaches on Medra’s free will much as it traps blightborns and highbloods in their labels. Naveen, for example, acknowledges that as a low-performing commoner, his destiny is sealed in the system. Naveen’s self-assessment foreshadows his fate of being transformed into a monster for the Games. However, the moment also shows how characters continue to assert their free will despite their many constraints and impositions. Medra chooses to give Naveen a merciful death, refusing to lose herself in the system. Despite the horrifying experience, Medra also chooses to spare Regan’s life by making it clear to Blake that she doesn’t want Regan executed. Other characters also offer acts of resistance to assert their individuality, such as when Florence’s mother rejects Medra’s offer of staying away from Florence to protect her. Jia tells Medra, “My daughter will choose her own friends. And if there are consequences for her actions…Well, that’s how we all learn” (168). Jia’s brave choice suggests that fate may make free will seem impossible, but individuals still need to keep exercising their choice wherever possible.

The Moral Cost of Survival in a Brutal World

In On Wings of Blood, characters constantly have to make ruthless choices in order to survive, raising the question of what survival costs individuals. In a world dominated by predatory vampires and a dehumanizing power structure, the lines between a monster and a regular person are blurred. Characters like Blake are forever trying to avoid becoming the outright monsters that are Viktor and Marcus, but sometimes surviving means adopting monstrous methods. Blake’s example suggests that merely surviving at any cost isn’t an ethically sound choice. The only morally unimpeachable decision in an unjust system is to dismantle it, whatever the dismantling entails.


Blake has a complex path to navigate, as he’s an inherently compassionate person trapped in a brutal world. His protective nature means that he values surviving for the sake of his loved ones above all rights and wrongs. Thus, he performs a series of “gray” actions, such as ruthlessly killing Kiernan at a bonfire for disrespecting his claim on Medra or feeding on Medra without seeking her consent. Blake justifies all these actions to himself as “necessary,” but the very fact that he’s plagued by self-doubt shows that he himself isn’t convinced of his choices.


Medra confronts her own moral conundrum after drinking Blake’s blood. During her fight with Regan in the Consort Games, she’s overcome with a powerful bloodlust. She also knows that killing Regan may ensure her own survival, but she ultimately chooses to incapacitate Regan rather than kill her. This moment is important, as it proves that even when endowed with vampiric power and rage, one can exercise moral restraint. Blake doesn’t exercise the same restraint when he’s feeding from Medra, suggesting that he couches an exploitative choice as romance and possession. Thus, the novel does not offer a simple answer about the cost of survival, instead showing how complex characters try to maintain their own moral compass while negotiating a ruthless world.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence