The Anatomy of Peace: Resolving the Heart of Conflict

The Arbinger Institute

The Anatomy of Peace: Resolving the Heart of Conflict

The Arbinger Institute
54 pages1-hour read
Nonfiction
Book
Adult
Published in 2015

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Background

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death.

Authorial and Critical Context: Collective Authorship and a Critical Response

The Anatomy of Peace is authored collectively by The Arbinger Institute and published by Berrett-Koehler Publishers. The Institute, founded in 1979, developed from the work of former Brigham Young University philosophy professor C. Terry Warner, whose research on self-deception and self-betrayal informs the Institute’s approach to organizational and interpersonal conflict. Authorship of the Institute’s books is credited as such because they’re produced through the collaborative work of multiple contributors. The Anatomy of Peace, as well as other books by the Institute, employs a didactic fictional narrative to convey its principles, centering part of the story on Yusuf al-Falah, a Palestinian Arab Muslim, and Avi Rozen, an Israeli Jew, to explore conflict between people who have experienced loss on opposing sides of a longstanding political conflict. Rather than advocating pacifism, the book argues that even when outward conflict is unavoidable, people can approach it with a “heart at peace” (34). The book’s own Note to Readers states explicitly that although some stories were inspired by actual events, no character or organization represents any specific person or organization.


This narrative strategy, however, has drawn criticism regarding representation and authorship. Reverend Hannah Adair Bonner has criticized the Institute’s use of fictional minority voices, particularly Palestinian and Black characters, arguing that this approach can obscure the perspectives and privileges of the book’s actual authors. She also questions the book’s application of the “heart at war” framework to people responding to systemic oppression (34), arguing that its treatment of conflict can obscure inequalities in power between oppressed groups and their oppressors (Bonner, Hannah Adair. “Anatomy of an Artifice.” Hannah Adair Bonner, 14 May 2014). Bonner’s critique raises questions about whether the book’s universal approach to conflict adequately accounts for systemic injustice and unequal power relations.

Philosophical Context: Martin Buber’s I and Thou

The central philosophical framework of The Anatomy of Peace is explicitly connected to the work of the influential Jewish philosopher Martin Buber. In his 1923 work Ich und Du (I and Thou), Buber describes two fundamental ways of relating to the world: “I-Thou” and “I-It.” These concepts describe different ways in which individuals perceive and relate to others, forming the basis of Buber’s philosophy of dialogue.


The “I-Thou” relationship is a mode of mutual relation in which one encounters another as a whole person rather than as an object. It’s associated with presence, directness, and reciprocity. In contrast, the “I-It” relationship treats the other as an object rather than a “Thou.” In The Anatomy of Peace, Buber’s distinction is presented in more practical terms: People can see others either as people, with needs and concerns as legitimate as their own, or as objects—such as obstacles, vehicles, or irrelevancies. The Arbinger Institute connects this distinction to its own model of a “heart at peace” and a “heart at war”: Seeing others as people corresponds to a “heart at peace,” while seeing them as objects corresponds to a “heart at war” (34). The book then extends this discussion by examining how people move between these ways of being, a question that Yusuf says Buber did not address. Buber’s philosophy therefore provides important context for understanding the person-object distinction that underlies the book’s approach to interpersonal conflict.

Historical Context: The Arab-Israeli Conflict as Narrative Framework

The Anatomy of Peace uses the long-standing Arab-Israeli conflict as an important historical backdrop for its fictional narrative. This choice grounds the book’s conflict-resolution framework in real histories of political conflict and personal loss. The backstories of Yusuf and Avi are anchored in specific events in the conflict. Yusuf’s personal history is shaped by the 1948 Deir Yassin massacre, an attack on a Palestinian village by the Zionist paramilitary organizations Irgun and Lehi; in the book, Yusuf’s father was killed in the attack. The 1967 Six-Day War also shapes Yusuf’s history. He fought near Latrun and returned home after Israel took control of East Jerusalem and the West Bank. Avi’s personal history, meanwhile, is shaped by the 1973 Yom Kippur War, a surprise attack on Israel by Egyptian and Syrian forces. In the book, Avi’s father, an Israeli reservist, was sent to fight Syrian forces on the Golan Heights and was killed three days later.


By embedding its narrative within these real-world events, the book uses the Arab-Israeli conflict to illustrate its theories on enmity, self-justification, and cycles of conflict. This strategy supports the book’s overarching argument that similar psychological patterns can contribute to conflict at different scales, from international conflicts to relationships in homes and workplaces.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs