Analyze how Maynard uses contrast or juxtaposition throughout the story (e.g., speech versus action, preparation versus performance, inclusion versus exclusion). How do these contrasts shape the reader’s perception of the characters and the conflict?

To what extent does the story suggest that systems of exclusion are self-perpetuating? How do the characters maintain the hierarchy they inhabit?

Explore the role of complicity in relation to social reward. How does the story depict the benefits of conformity, and how do these rewards influence the characters’ decisions?

The “in” group is described as particularly similar: “They were all alike” (1). How does this lack of individuality contribute to their power? What might Maynard be suggesting about conformity and identity?

Discuss Laura’s speech on civil rights. What commentary does the story offer on this broader social movement? What is its relationship to the narrative action?

Compare this story to another YA text set within the context of the Civil Rights movement, such as The Rock and the River or Lies We Tell Ourselves. Do they offer similar or different perspectives?

Discuss Maynard’s use of free indirect discourse. How does this immersion in Laura’s perspective serve the story’s overall meaning?

Consider Rachel’s enthusiasm about the World of Nature show and her interest in shells. How do these details about her interests contribute to her overall characterization and role in the story?