The Great Fire

Jim Murphy

51 pages 1-hour read

Jim Murphy

The Great Fire

Nonfiction | Book | Middle Grade | Published in 1995

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Introduction-Chapter 2Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of animal death and racism.

Introduction Summary

The Great Chicago Fire began on the night of Sunday, October 8, 1871, and burned for 31 hours, forcing more than 100,000 people to flee. The book draws on survivor accounts from books, articles, and letters to recount the disaster. Several figures appear briefly, including Catherine and Patrick O’Leary, in whose barn the fire started; James H. Hildreth, a former alderman who decided that the best way to save Chicago was by blowing up parts of it; and Julia Lemos, a widow who single-handedly saved her five small children and her elderly parents. The narrative follows four individuals more closely: Joseph E. Chamberlin, a 20-year-old reporter for the Chicago Evening Post; Horace White, editor-in-chief of the Chicago Tribune; Alexander Frear, who was visiting relatives in Chicago at the time of the fire; and Claire Innes, a 12-year-old who had recently moved to Chicago with her family.

Chapter 1 Summary: “A City Ready to Burn”

On the warm evening of Sunday, October 8, Daniel “Peg Leg” Sullivan, a one-legged wagon driver, visited neighbors on Chicago’s West Side. He stopped at the home of Patrick and Catherine O’Leary at around eight o’clock in the evening but left quickly because the family had already gone to bed—Patrick to prepare for his laborer’s job and Catherine to milk the family’s cows before delivering milk to neighbors the next morning. Sullivan sat down on the wooden sidewalk across the street in front of Thomas White’s house. Nearby, the McLaughlins were hosting a party for a relative newly arrived from Ireland. At 8:30 pm, another neighbor, Dennis Rogan, also stopped by the O’Learys and found them asleep.


About 15 minutes later, as Sullivan rose to head home, he spotted a single flame shooting from the side of the O’Learys’ barn and immediately raised the alarm. He rushed inside to save the animals—five cows, a calf, and a horse—but the terrified animals wouldn’t move. As the fire spread behind him, he slipped on the uneven floorboards, and his wooden leg jammed between the boards and came off. He hopped toward the door. The O’Learys’ calf bumped into him, and he grabbed its neck; they escaped together, both badly singed. An attached shed full of coal and kindling was already burning, and flames raced through dry grass and fences until the O’Learys’ cottage, 40 feet away, began to smolder. Neighbors rushed out with buckets, and the party music stopped, replaced by cries of “FIRE!”


Murphy then explains why Chicago was so vulnerable. Of the city’s 59,500 buildings, roughly two-thirds were wood. Even structures described as fireproof typically concealed wooden frames and flammable tar or shingle roofs behind brick or stone facades, and decorative exterior details were almost universally carved wood painted to resemble stone or marble. Residential neighborhoods were packed with cottages, barns, and sheds on small lots, and over 55 miles of pine-block streets and 600 miles of wooden sidewalks made large areas of the city highly combustible. Fires had been increasing in number for years, and a severe summer drought had left the landscape extremely dry by October—as many as six fires broke out daily, and the Saturday before had seen a blaze that destroyed four city blocks. What made Sunday especially dangerous was a strong, gusty southwest wind.


That wind pushed the fire from the O’Leary barn into neighboring yards. Rogan returned and woke the O’Learys, and they got their children out of the house while Patrick and a group of neighbors repeatedly doused the cottage, which survived with little damage. Down the block, William Lee, a neighbor, checked on his crying infant and saw a crimson sky and embers falling in his yard. He ran three blocks to Bruno Goll’s drugstore to turn in a fire alarm while the fire was still less than 15 minutes old. What followed was a series of fatal errors that allowed the fire to spread unchecked.

Chapter 2 Summary: “Everything Went Wrong!”

Lee arrived at Goll’s drugstore gasping, but Goll refused to hand over the alarm key, insisting that an engine had already passed. Lee rushed back to find fire taking hold of his neighbor’s shed and fence and threatening his own house. His wife grabbed their infant and carried him outside while Lee collected a few essentials; the family spent the night watching the fire from a nearby vacant lot, joined by the singed calf that Sullivan had helped escape from the O’Leary barn. Goll later claimed to have sent two alarms, but no alarm was recorded at the central office while the fire was still containable. He ultimately locked up his store and walked to De Koven Street to watch the blaze along with the growing crowd.


At the courthouse, Mathias Schaffer, the 40-year-old cupola watchman, initially mistook smoke pointed out by a visitor for lingering embers from the previous night’s fire. When he finally spotted active flames, he misjudged their location because the new blaze sat almost directly behind the still-smoldering Saturday fire site. At 9:30 pm, he signaled box 342, sending engines racing to a spot nearly a mile from the O’Learys’. He soon realized his error and ordered his assistant, William J. Brown, to strike box 319—still seven blocks off but close enough that crews could see the flames and correct course. Brown refused, insisting that a second signal would only cause confusion. The misdirected alarm pulled engines away from the real fire and caused nearby companies, which had already prepared to roll, to stand down. Only two companies weren’t fooled.


Reporter Joseph E. Chamberlin reached the scene within minutes and found that the fire had already advanced about a block through the crowded frame buildings near De Koven and Jefferson Streets. He was contemptuous of the poor neighborhood and its residents, a bias that would later help fix public blame on Catherine O’Leary and her cow. The first two units to arrive—America, a hose cart, and Little Giant, the oldest engine in service—lacked the power to throw water far enough to be effective, forcing crews to stand dangerously close to the flames. Chief Marshal Robert A. Williams, head of the fire department, arrived and worked to encircle the blaze, ordering foreman John Dorsey to turn in a second alarm. Chamberlin, meanwhile, was forced to retreat as a fence ignited right where he had been standing moments before.


Across the city, 12-year-old Claire Innes was briefly jolted awake in her home in the South Division, one of the city’s three main sections, by a passing wagon and street noise. Her father investigated but seemed unconcerned, and Claire went back to sleep. Many others in Chicago showed similar unconcern. That same day’s Chicago Tribune had warned of extreme fire danger after three weeks without rain, but few paid attention. Alfred L. Sewell, strolling through the city at around 9:30 pm, found beerhouses full and people happily out in the warm evening. Even Horace White, the Tribune’s own editor-in-chief, heard the courthouse bell but didn’t bother to get out of bed.


When Dorsey reached the alarm box at Goll’s drugstore, he pulled the lever only once instead of four times and failed to trigger a true second alarm. Schaffer and Brown heard the single strike, mistook it for a duplicate of the original signal, and dispatched no additional engines. The fire had now been burning for over an hour.


Williams assembled a thin ring of engines around the blaze and asked spectators to help by chopping up wooden fences and sidewalks to deprive the fire of fuel. James H. Hildreth arrived and proposed blowing up houses to create a firebreak. Williams lacked both the authority and the explosives but sent Hildreth off to find powder anyway. Meanwhile, firefighter Charles Anderson and his friend Charles McConners struggled against the heat; McConners propped up a wooden door as a makeshift shield, but it caught fire and burned his hand. The fire’s powerful updraft launched flaming debris high into the air, and the wind scattered burning material over the firefighters’ heads, igniting spot fires behind the defensive line. When a more powerful steamer arrived and pulled Anderson’s hose from the water plug, his water dropped to a trickle, and several houses across the street ignited before he could act. A second steamer also malfunctioned and was briefly repaired; then, at around 10:30 pm, an old section of hose burst entirely. With two breaks developing in the firefighting line, the wind drove the fire past the firefighters and toward the center of the city. As one firefighter later put it, “From the beginning of that fatal fire, everything went wrong!” (42).

Introduction-Chapter 2 Analysis

Murphy structures the opening chapters by moving between broader explanations of Chicago’s infrastructure and the experiences of individual residents during the fire. The opening sections shift between descriptions of the city’s largely wooden buildings, pine-block streets, and elevated sidewalks and the experiences of residents like Daniel Sullivan and William Lee as the fire spread through De Koven Street. This structure helps Murphy explain both the scale of the disaster and the conditions that left Chicago highly vulnerable to fire, reinforcing the theme of Urban Growth and the Failure of Chicago’s Infrastructure. Sullivan’s escape from the burning O’Leary barn, during which he lost his wooden leg while trying to rescue the animals, gives the disaster an immediate human dimension. At the same time, Murphy’s repeated emphasis on wooden sidewalks, fences, and buildings introduces the motif of wood, which reflects the city’s physical vulnerability. By combining eyewitness experiences with historical and infrastructural detail, Murphy presents the fire as both a personal tragedy and a broader urban disaster shaped by unsafe construction practices and weak emergency systems.


The early chapters further highlight the gap between Chicago’s reputation as a modern city and the weaknesses within its infrastructure. The text emphasizes that even the city’s wealthiest, allegedly fireproof structures merely hid wooden frames and highly flammable tar roofs behind thin veneers of stone and brick. Murphy also repeatedly emphasizes the city’s widespread use of wood, including the 600 miles of elevated wooden sidewalks that connected different neighborhoods in what he describes as “a highly combustible knot” (19). These details reinforce the theme of Urban Growth and the Failure of Chicago’s Infrastructure by showing how rapid expansion and construction practices left the city dangerously vulnerable to fire. The recurring focus on wooden buildings, sidewalks, and fences also further develops the motif of wood, which symbolizes Chicago’s physical fragility. Murphy’s descriptions of these hidden fire hazards also create a growing sense of tension, as readers recognize that many of the structures celebrated as symbols of progress were highly susceptible to fire once the blaze spread beyond containment.


Alongside these infrastructural weaknesses, Murphy also highlights the widespread complacency that shaped many residents’ responses to the growing fire danger. Despite severe drought conditions, an increasing number of daily fires, and explicit warnings printed in the local newspapers, many residents initially responded to the blaze with indifference. Twelve-year-old Claire Innes briefly woke to the commotion before returning to sleep, and Horace White, a local newspaper editor, heard the courthouse alarm bell but refused to get out of bed. These reactions suggest that frequent smaller fires had made many residents underestimate the seriousness of the situation. Their dismissive reactions contrast sharply with the rapid, wind-driven movement of the flames from the O’Leary barn. By documenting this widespread unconcern alongside the worsening fire conditions, Murphy shows how routine exposure to smaller emergencies left the city psychologically unprepared for a disaster of this scale.


The text traces the escalation of the fire through a series of institutional and individual failures that prevented early containment. As the flames spread beyond De Koven Street, several missteps delayed the response: druggist Bruno Goll refused to provide the fire-alarm key, courthouse watchman Mathias Schaffer misidentified the fire’s location, and his assistant William J. Brown stubbornly ignored orders to strike a corrected alarm. The repeated descriptions of broken hoses, failed alarms, and delayed communication also emphasize how quickly small errors escalated under worsening conditions. Murphy’s reconstruction of these failures suggests that the scale of the disaster resulted from multiple human and infrastructural weaknesses rather than a single isolated mistake.


The early chapters also introduce the class prejudices that would later shape public memory of the disaster, reinforcing the theme of Disaster Exposes and Deepens Class Divides. When reporter Joseph E. Chamberlin arrived at the fire, he immediately expressed contempt for the working-class, heavily Irish neighborhood of De Koven Street. Murphy notes that these attitudes later contributed to the public scapegoating of Catherine O’Leary. Chamberlin’s reaction reflects the city’s broader socioeconomic divisions and prejudices toward poor immigrant communities. Instead of focusing primarily on unsafe construction practices, drought conditions, and failures within the city’s emergency systems, many public narratives increasingly placed blame on the immigrants living in the neighborhood where the fire began. Introducing these attitudes early in the text also helps develop the theme of Eyewitness Accounts and the Making of Chicago Fire Myths, as Murphy shows how personal bias and selective reporting influenced public understanding of the disaster. By tracing how blame shifted toward marginalized residents, Murphy highlights how social prejudice shaped both the immediate response to the fire and the historical narratives that followed.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 51 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs