The Masterpiece

Fiona Davis

The Masterpiece

Fiona Davis
61 pages2-hour read
Fiction
Novel
Adult
Published in 2018

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Background

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of gender discrimination.

Sociohistorical Context: New York’s Decline and the Preservation Movement of the 1970s

Virginia Clay’s story unfolds during the 1970s, a decade when New York City teetered on the brink of bankruptcy. Plagued by a severe fiscal crisis, soaring crime rates, and widespread urban decay, the city’s grand architectural treasures became vulnerable to demolition in the name of progress. The fight to save Grand Central Terminal, central to the novel, was born from the memory of a previous loss: the 1963 demolition of the original Pennsylvania Station, an event that galvanized a powerful preservation movement. This movement led to the creation of the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission in 1965. When Penn Central Railroad, the terminal’s owner, proposed building a 55-story skyscraper on top of the station, the commission designated the building a landmark, setting the stage for a legal battle. This culminated in the 1978 Supreme Court case Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City, which saw the Court rule that the terminal’s designation as a landmark did not significantly hinder the economic potential of Penn Central’s property holdings. The terminal maintained its landmark designation. However, because Penn Central was undergoing bankruptcy around this time, it could not restore the terminal, forcing the government to execute repairs at public expense.


The novel mirrors this real-world conflict, with characters like Dennis Huckle arguing the terminal is a costly “money pit” (64). The fight was championed by the Municipal Art Society and prominent historical figures like Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, whose efforts are reflected in Virginia’s transformation from a temp in a “dumpy train station” (16) to a passionate activist. This era also saw evolving roles for women, with rising divorce rates pushing many, like Virginia, into the workforce and public life for the first time, positioning them to become key players in civic battles.

Cultural Context: The New York Art World and Gender Bias in the 1920s

Clara Darden’s narrative is shaped by the rigid cultural hierarchies of the 1920s New York art world, which drew a sharp distinction between “fine art” and “commercial illustration.” Fine art, such as oil painting and sculpture, was considered the highest form of creative expression and was a field dominated by men. Commercial illustration, used for magazines and advertisements, was viewed as a less prestigious, applied craft. However, it was one of the few artistic avenues where women could achieve significant professional success and financial independence. Real-life figures like Helen Dryden, whom the author cites as an inspiration and who created numerous covers for Vogue, and Jessie Willcox Smith, a celebrated illustrator for magazines like Good Housekeeping, built lucrative careers in this field. Nevertheless, women would continue to experience systemic barriers in various fields including art throughout the 20th century, with many women facing the social expectation to marry or start a family, especially in the wake of the two World Wars that saw society trying to recover from the trauma of widespread death and tragedy. By the 1960s and 1970s, the civil rights movement and anti-war activism protesting the Vietnam War would galvanize demands for gender equality in various areas of society, including professional life. It was in this social atmosphere that art historian Linda Nochlin published her seminal 1971 essay, “Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?”, arguing that female artists were rendered invisible by systemic obstruction, which limited their educational and exhibition opportunities. This inspired many art historians of the time to rediscover the work of female artists.


This context illuminates Clara’s struggle for legitimacy in The Masterpiece. Her ambition is to be a successful illustrator, yet she constantly faces condescension from the fine art establishment. The student Nadine dismisses illustration as a mere “stepping-stone into the true arts” (8), and the school’s director, Mr. Lorette, relegates Clara’s work to a back office during a faculty exhibition. The heated debates between Clara and the fine artist Levon Zakarian dramatize this cultural divide, framing Clara’s journey as a reflection of the real-world challenges and opportunities faced by ambitious women artists in the Jazz Age. Likewise, Nochlin’s essay and the historiographic awakening it helped to galvanize resonates with Virginia’s journey to champion Clara’s work and to eventually enter the field of art history by the end of the novel.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 61 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs