The Murder on the Links

Agatha Christie

The Murder on the Links

Agatha Christie
59 pages1-hour read
Fiction
Novel
Adult
Published in 1923

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 19-24Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 19 Summary: “I Use My Grey Cells”

Immediately after Jack’s arrest, a shaken Hastings believes the young man is guilty. Poirot requests that Giraud explain his reasoning, and the rival detective leads them into the salon.


Giraud’s case rests on four points: Jack’s motive (a bitter quarrel with his father), his concealed presence in Merlinville that night, his opportunity to steal the dagger used on the second body, and Mrs. Renauld’s false testimony, which he claims a mother would give only to protect her child. Poirot challenges each point, notes that someone else could have taken the dagger while the shed was unlocked, and poses a question Giraud can’t answer: If Jack needed the body found quickly to claim his inheritance, why dig a grave at all? Poirot reminds Giraud about the unresolved mystery of the lead piping and leaves.


In the hallway, Mrs. Renauld descends the staircase and collapses at the news that her son has been arrested, striking her head on the stairs. Poirot judges the injury serious and estimates she will be unconscious for at least a week. On a grassy knoll overlooking the sea, he challenges Hastings to reason through the facts independently. After some thought, Hastings realizes they’ve overlooked a critical figure, Georges Conneau.

Chapter 20 Summary: “An Amazing Statement”

Poirot applauds Hastings’ insight about Conneau and urges him to continue. Hastings proposes that Conneau drifted to Merlinville, murdered Renauld out of jealousy over Madame Daubreuil, tried to blackmail her, and then died of an epileptic fit. He suggests that Jack, arriving afterward, agreed with Madame Daubreuil to cover the man’s death up to protect Marthe. Poirot reminds him that Conneau couldn’t have blackmailed Madame Daubreuil since she could have revealed him as a wanted murderer.


Poirot then constructs his own account, identifying Madame Daubreuil as Madame Beroldy from the earlier murder case. The identical fabricated story of foreign intruders in both cases points to a single author, Conneau himself. Poirot proposes that Conneau worked with Mrs. Renauld as his accomplice. He walks Hastings through a timeline of the past few weeks, highlighting Renauld’s changed behavior in Merlinville, his blackmail payments to Madame Daubreuil, his quarrel with Jack over Marthe, the revisions to his will, and the events of June 7, when the unhoused man died.


Poirot reminds Hastings that Renauld’s body wore a notably long overcoat while Jack’s was short. He deduces that Jack left for Paris hurriedly and in anger, grabbing his father’s coat by mistake. This means the love letter found in the pocket was written to Jack, not his father.


Poirot places the unhoused man’s death on the morning of June 7. That confrontation prompted Renauld to send for Poirot, dispatch Jack abroad, and dismiss the chauffeur. He proposes that the man’s mysterious evening visitor was a woman named Bella Duveen, Jack’s correspondent, who rejected a payment Renauld offered her.


Applying Giraud’s belief that women lie for themselves, their lovers, or their children, Poirot reasons that Mrs. Renauld was protecting none of those unless her husband was Conneau. The man she loved most was her husband. Therefore, Paul Renauld and Georges Conneau are the same person. Hastings objects that this means Renauld planned his own murder. Poirot confirms it.

Chapter 21 Summary: “Hercule Poirot on the Case”

Poirot clarifies that Renauld planned his disappearance, not his death. Conneau, wanted for murder, had fled to Canada, rebuilt his life under the alias of Paul Renauld, and eventually returned to France. In Merlinville, he was recognized by Madame Daubreuil, who began blackmailing him. When Jack fell in love with Marthe, Renauld faced exposure if he tried to stop the marriage, so he and Mrs. Renauld devised a plan: He would fake his death, she would manage the inheritance as a widow, and they would reunite abroad.


When the unhoused man died of an epileptic fit in their garden, they had the body they needed to substitute for Renauld’s. They dressed the corpse in Renauld’s clothing, stabbed it with the dagger, and intended to use the lead piping to make the face unrecognizable. The grave was placed where a golf bunker was to be dug, ensuring its discovery. Renauld planned to bind his wife, don the dead man’s ragged clothing, and slip away on the 12:10 train. Bella Duveen’s visit caused a dangerous delay, but he managed to see her off. Then, while digging the grave, an unknown person stabbed him from behind.


Two crimes therefore exist: The staged disappearance Renauld engineered, and the real murder committed by a still-unidentified killer. The dark hair found coiled on the dagger belonged to Mrs. Renauld, whose once-dark hair has largely turned silver, a detail that misled Giraud entirely. Arriving to identify a body she expected to be the unhoused man’s, Mrs. Renauld instead found her husband’s actual corpse, and she has been forced to maintain her false story to protect her son from scandal ever since.


Poirot decides to travel to England to locate Bella Duveen, whom he deduces must be a stage performer. He shows Hastings a photograph taken from Jack’s room, which is inscribed with the message, “With love from Bella” (173). Hastings stares at the image and recognizes the face of “Cinderella.”

Chapter 22 Summary: “I Find Love”

Hastings conceals his recognition from Poirot. During the crossing to England, he thinks through “Cinderella’s” likely movements: She must have left the train at Calais, traveled to Merlinville that evening, and gone to the villa around the time the servants described Renauld receiving a visitor. He wonders whether she could establish an alibi for Jack, while dreading what Poirot already suspects about her.


In London, Poirot enlists Joseph Aarons, a theatrical agent, who identifies the woman in the photograph as one of the Dulcibella Kids, two sisters who perform as singers, dancers, and acrobats. The duo is recently back from Paris. The next morning, a note from Aarons informs Poirot that the Dulcibella Kids will be performing at the Palace Theatre in Coventry that evening, and Poirot and Hastings attend.


Hastings recognizes “Cinderella” among the performers but leaves early, feeling troubled. Shortly afterward, “Cinderella” appears at the hotel, having followed him from the theatre. Pale and frightened, she asks whether Poirot is the detective searching for her.


Hastings comforts her and asks gently whether she took the dagger. She says that she did because she feared there may have been fingerprints on the weapon. He then declares his love for her and reconstructs what he believes happened: Still near the villa after her meeting with Renauld, she saw a figure on the golf links wearing a coat she recognized as Jack’s and struck out in a jealous rage, accidentally killing his father. Her reaction seems to confirm the account. When Hastings assumes she still loves Jack, she contradicts him fiercely and declares she loves Hastings.


Poirot appears at the door. Hastings delays him long enough for “Cinderella” to flee, and Poirot accepts this calmly, acknowledging he’d known from the start that Hastings recognized the woman’s photograph. Hastings declares he must now work against Poirot and fabricates an alibi for her: He claims to have traveled with “Cinderella” from France on the day of the murder and parted from her at Victoria Station that evening, making her presence in Merlinville impossible. Poirot calls the invention ingenious and marvels at the power of love.

Chapter 23 Summary: “Difficulties Ahead”

The next morning, Poirot informs Hastings that the Dulcibella Kids have cancelled their Coventry engagement and vanished. Hastings is satisfied that Bella made use of the head star he gave her but troubled because he has no way to tell her about the alibi he invented on her behalf.


Poirot announces his intention to return to France immediately. Hastings knows he must go, too, because the only way to protect Bella is to keep Poirot under observation. Poirot agrees without protest, openly preferring Hastings at his side to a clumsy attempt at surveillance. They acknowledge, almost amicably, that they are now working at cross-purposes.


A passing thought of Jack jolts Hastings. Absorbed in Bella’s situation, he’d barely considered the innocent man awaiting trial. He’s horrified to realize that, in shielding her, he may be helping to send Jack to the guillotine. He tells himself Jack will almost certainly be acquitted and resolves to trust Poirot to clear him without exposing Bella though an uneasy fear persists.

Chapter 24 Summary: “‘Save Him!’”

Returning to France, Poirot and Hastings visit Hautet, who reports that Jack is making no effort to defend himself and is offering only a blanket denial. He invites them to observe the next interrogation, confirms that Mrs. Renauld remains unconscious, and hands Poirot a letter that arrived in his absence.


Outside, they encounter a self-satisfied Giraud. When Poirot declares Jack innocent, Giraud dismisses him, and Poirot responds by challenging him to a wager of 500 francs on who identifies the true murderer first. They then meet Stonor, who shares their conviction that Jack didn’t commit the crime. Poirot asks him to send word the moment Mrs. Renauld regains consciousness.


At the hotel, Poirot dismantles the dagger defense Hastings had been relying upon. The detective’s research revealed that Jack commissioned three identical daggers, not two, meaning he would still have had one after giving the others to his mother and to Bella. Poirot then opens the letter, in which Marthe begs him to save Jack.


They drive at once to the Villa Marguerite. Marthe, barred from visiting Jack in prison, immediately accuses Mrs. Renauld and Stonor of committing the murder for the inheritance. Poirot asks quietly whether she knows her mother’s real name, and her tearful reaction confirms she does. Asked whether she knew who Renauld truly was, she’s genuinely baffled. Poirot walks her through the full truth of the case. When he finishes, an awestruck Marthe kneels before him and begs him to save the man she loves.

Chapters 19-24 Analysis

In the novel’s fourth section, Jack’s arrest escalates the novel’s suspense and adds urgency to the theme of The Importance of Psychology and Logic in Investigations. Giraud builds his case against Jack using tangible clues, such as the stolen dagger, whereas Poirot focuses on the psychological impossibility of Giraud’s theory, asking, “Since it was to Jack Renauld’s advantage that the body should be found without delay, why dig a grave at all?” (154). Giraud’s accumulation of physical facts fails because he ignores the internal logic of the suspect’s actions. Poirot disregards the superficial evidence in favor of understanding human motivation, specifically the rationale behind staging a crime scene. This contrast reinforces the conventions of the Golden Age of Detective Fiction, which privileges the brilliant amateur’s psychological intellect over the institutional police force’s rigid, often misguided reliance on early forensic science.


Poirot’s revelation of Renauld’s true identity exposes how historical crimes continually destabilize the present, illustrating the theme of The Inescapable Consequences of Past Deceptions. Poirot deduces that Renauld is actually the fugitive Georges Conneau, who orchestrated an elaborate plan to fake his own death to escape Madame Daubreuil’s blackmail. This plan centered around placing the body of the unhoused man in a freshly dug golf bunker to misdirect the authorities. However, an unknown assailant utilized this pre-arranged staging to murder Renauld, leaving him in the very grave meant for his decoy. Renauld’s elaborate deception, designed to permanently bury his criminal past, creates the exact vulnerable conditions that facilitate his actual death. The open grave thus functions as a motif of The Inescapable Consequences of Past Deceptions. Rather than escaping his history, Renauld’s reliance on falsehoods ensures his demise. By having the past dictate the mechanics of the present murder, the narrative structure underscores that attempts to rewrite or outrun one’s history only generate further destruction.


These chapters use hidden identities to propel the plot and emphasize the theme of The Unreliability of Appearances and Testimony. When Hastings confronts “Cinderella,” he reconstructs the crime based on the premise that she saw a figure on the golf links wearing Jack’s coat and struck in a jealous rage, inadvertently killing his father. This version of the events emphasizes the peril of relying on appearances by supposing that the overcoat is the key factor that led to Renauld’s death, which is interpreted as a case of mistaken identity. Adding another layer to the thematic exploration of unreliable appearance and testimony, “Cinderella’s” terror and tearful confirmation of Hastings’s theory convince him that she is Bella when, in reality, she is her twin, Dulcie. As the story continues, Hastings’s account of the murder and Dulcie’s fears that her sister killed Renauld are both disproven, providing further testament of the risk of accepting seemingly apparent solutions to complex problems.


The tension between Hastings’s feelings for “Cinderella” and his sense of justice add depth and inner conflict to the narrator while contributing to the story’s examination of witnesses’ unreliability. After “Cinderella” admits to taking the murder weapon to hide potential fingerprints, Hastings invents a false alibi for her, telling Poirot that he traveled with her from France and parted ways in London. Hastings’s desperation to protect “Cinderella” pushes him to lie to his closest friend, actively working at cross-purposes to the investigation. This rupture in the traditional detective-sidekick dynamic adds psychological friction to the established series formula, demonstrating how emotional entanglements can compromise the supposedly objective recording of a mystery.


The testimonies of the secondary characters also emphasize how personal loyalty obscures factual truth. Mrs. Renauld lies to the authorities to protect the reputation of the man she loved and to shield her son from learning of his father’s past life, maintaining her fabricated story of masked intruders even after discovering her husband’s corpse. Similarly, Jack accepts his arrest without fighting back because he believes Bella is the killer; the examining magistrate notes that he “takes refuge in a most obstinate silence” (189). Mrs. Renauld and Jack’s refusal to aid the investigation reveal that they prioritize shielding their loved ones above all else, making honest feelings the source of deliberate falsehood.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 59 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs