The Other Side of Change: Who We Become When Life Makes Other Plans

Maya Shankar

34 pages 1-hour read

Maya Shankar

The Other Side of Change: Who We Become When Life Makes Other Plans

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2026

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Preface-Chapter 2Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of illness and addiction.

Preface Summary & Analysis

Maya Shankar discusses how the book addresses three distinct concerns. First, Shankar examines the experience of sudden, unwanted changes in one’s life. Second, Shankar explores how these changes cause a person to undergo significant psychological transformations. Third, Shankar examines how individuals can recover from such a transformation.


Shankar provides several examples of significant events that can create a “before” and “after” sense of time in one’s life, including her own experience of a change in plans regarding becoming a mother. She describes her feelings of shock and isolation with respect to her ability to make decisions. Ordinary life continued to occur all around her during this time, but her internal perspective was changed.


Through the use of this personal experience, Shankar establishes a number of key concepts that establish a foundation for the ideas presented throughout the remainder of the book. The first is the idea of the “illusion of control,” or the tendency for people to believe that they can exert greater control over their lives than they actually do. Shankar states that this illusion of control is particularly important in relation to experiencing negative and unanticipated events. When such events occur, people typically lose some level of confidence in their ability to control their lives. As a result of this uncertainty, people can become disoriented and distressed.


Shankar also notes that people often report that traditional advice regarding how to respond to difficult circumstances appears hollow. Specifically, people may be told to take actions in response to difficult situations (e.g., maintain a positive attitude). However, under extreme levels of distress, these types of recommendations can appear ineffective. Shankar therefore distinguishes between providing general advice and addressing specific needs; this book is asking questions about how people are able to adapt and find different ways of thinking and feeling as opposed to simply telling them how they should think and feel.


These are the questions Shankar asked after her own upheaval. She interviewed numerous individuals who had experienced significant disruptions in their lives. Initially, she engaged in casual conversations with individuals in various settings, including work environments and social gatherings. Later, she conducted formal interviews as part of her podcast, A Slight Change of Plans. Through her background as a cognitive scientist, Shankar developed an interest in exploring some of the less apparent psychological processes involved in adaptation. Throughout many of the interviews she conducted, Shankar found herself observing consistent patterns: Individuals reported confronting similar emotional responses (e.g., anger, fear) and utilized similar strategies (e.g., finding support) to help facilitate their recovery. This focus on similar mental processing patterns among many individuals gives the book widespread applicability; it does not target those who have experienced only one type of traumatic occurrence.


Finally, Shankar extends the scope of consideration by presenting additional research findings related to the “end of history illusion.” This refers to a well-documented phenomenon where individuals tend to significantly underestimate how much they will evolve in terms of their values, abilities, etc., over their lifetime. Shankar identifies two main categories of change. The first is change resulting from major disruptions in an individual’s life. The second is change resulting from an individual’s ongoing development and growth. According to Shankar, major disruptions can greatly accelerate personal change. 


The Preface frames change as both loss and discovery/recreation. Overall, it presents two primary conclusions. First, major disruptions in one’s life can lead to permanent changes in an individual’s identity. Second, recovery from such disruptions may provide a way for individuals to identify and transform elements of themselves in ways that enhance what lies ahead.


Published in 2026, The Other Side of Change emerged at a time of societal upheaval, including the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, the ongoing climate crisis, and the widespread adoption of AI. Although the book speaks mostly to those experiencing personal change, this context tacitly informs its emphasis on rebuilding after disruption.


Chapter Lessons

  • Recognize how much distress comes from uncertainty, not just from loss itself.
  • Question the assumption that your current self is the same self who will face every stage of a disruption.
  • Look for shared patterns in other people’s stories of change rather than focusing only on surface differences.
  • Reframe painful upheaval as a process that may reveal new values, capacities, or directions over time.


Reflection Questions

  • When have you experienced a change that made life feel divided into a “before” and an “after,” and how did it affect your sense of control or identity?
  • How might it help to assume that the person you become during a crisis may think, value, and respond differently than you do now?

Chapter 1 Summary & Analysis: “Locked In”

Chapter 1 is about Olivia Lewis, a college senior whose life changed suddenly after she experienced a major stroke and developed locked-in syndrome (a condition where someone is conscious and able to think clearly but cannot move). Shankar describes how, prior to her stroke, Olivia defined herself based upon her desire for social acceptance, academic success, and the belief that things were “finally” coming together. After her stroke, Olivia found herself trapped inside a body she no longer controls. She communicated solely through blinking and faces the challenge of defining a new identity.


Shankar uses Olivia’s experiences to describe how individuals react psychologically when change alters the identity they envisioned for themselves. Initially, Olivia accepted that she had experienced a stroke; however, she rejected the implication of what the stroke would mean for her future. Shankar refers to this as second-order denial, a type of denial where an individual acknowledges the fundamental realities of a situation but diminishes what these realities will ultimately mean for their future. Olivia became fascinated with the story of Kate Allatt, a person with locked-in syndrome who recovered unusually well. She ignored examples that did not fit her vision of recovering completely, like Kate. This illustrates that denial may not simply look like refusing to acknowledge reality. It can also take on forms such as selective optimism or rigidly adhering to a specific outcome.


Shankar states that Olivia’s denial is directly related to her self-concept. Prior to her stroke, much of her self-worth was comprised of how others viewed her. As she lay in the hospital, Olivia continued to define much of her worth by trying to appear acceptable to her boyfriend’s family, her friends, therapists, and medical professionals. Shankar posits that denial may serve as a temporary psychological coping mechanism for individuals when change appears to threaten an identity that the individual perceives as necessary. However, in many instances, this coping mechanism provides temporary motivation but ultimately increases the potential for future distress should reality not resemble the desired outcome.


Through her relationships with therapists who treated her with consistency and respect rather than pity, Olivia began to develop beyond her previous dependency on external validation. Shankar expands upon this aspect of Olivia’s story through an exploration of self-affirmation. Self-affirmation refers to a process of focusing on various aspects of an individual’s identity that are not compromised by current loss.


In conclusion, Chapter 1 conveys that denial typically serves as a protective response for a threatened sense of self. In many ways, this echoes the longstanding conceptualization of denial as a natural stage of the grieving process, as popularized by psychiatrist Elisabeth Kübler-Ross’s 1969 On Death and Dying, a study of patients with terminal illnesses. However, where some grief specialists (including Kübler-Ross herself) advise against trying to break through an individual’s denial, Shankar suggests that doing so may be necessary for long-term thriving. Ultimately, adaptation becomes more feasible when individuals begin creating identities that are less susceptible to fragility and less reliant on single roles, bodies, achievements, or judgments from other people.


Chapter Lessons

  • Examine which parts of your identity feel most threatened during a major disruption.
  • Notice when hope becomes denial by narrowing your view to only the outcome you want.
  • Reaffirm values or qualities that remain intact even when circumstances change.
  • Rebuild self-worth around deeper principles rather than unstable forms of approval.


Reflection Questions

  • When have you accepted the facts of a difficult situation but resisted what those facts might mean for your future?
  • Which parts of your identity depend most on performance, status, appearance, or other people’s approval, and how might you make that identity more flexible?

Chapter 2 Summary & Analysis: “Possible Selves”

This chapter explores how sudden changes can limit or warp an individual’s perception of their future and how new identities can be visualized. At age 16, Reginald Dwayne Betts was sentenced to adult prison after a conviction for carjacking. Prior to entering prison, Dwayne envisioned himself as exceptionally talented, a future college graduate, and able to escape the poverty and violence characteristic of his home environment. Prison destroyed this future vision. Dwayne feared not only the punishment but also the type of person he would potentially become while incarcerated, i.e., violent, numb, addicted to drugs, or forever labeled “inmate.”


To further explain Dwayne’s experience, Shankar introduces the concept of “possible selves,” theorized by psychologists Hazel Markus and Paula Nurius. A person’s possible selves include their hopeful selves, fearful selves, and expected selves—the potential identities a person envisions themselves becoming. As Shankar illustrates throughout this chapter, during times of turmoil, individuals typically reduce their possible selves severely. They usually believe that due to one change alone, a multitude of viable future possibilities have disappeared and/or that they will ultimately realize a negative identity. This theory provides general insight regarding why individuals may perceive change to be psychologically stifling prior to knowing all of the long-term effects of that change.


Dwayne began to expand his imaginative capacity through two different sources: first, his interactions with Bilal, an older inmate who protected younger inmates from danger and maintained great personal dignity, and second, through Etheridge Knight’s poetry written during his time in prison. Through Knight’s poetry, Dwayne came to understand writing as a valid path for him and not just something reserved for others. Shankar describes Dwayne’s response to Bilal as moral elevation—the emotional feeling inspired by another person’s courageousness or moral beauty. To Shankar, moral elevation is important, as it allows individuals to think beyond what they believe is humanly possible. While Bilal and Knight did nothing to improve Dwayne’s current circumstances, they provided him with models of who he could become within those circumstances.


Shankar provides additional illustrations of this idea, such as Nora McInerny resisting the identity of widow and Christine Hà transforming herself as a chef who is blind. According to Shankar, individuals can create new possible selves by breaking down big dreams into small goals, utilizing new beginnings, using the tactic of “temptation bundling,” and having support systems. While none of these methods will eliminate structural barriers—Dwayne eventually discovered that stigma lasted well past any formal changes in status—the overall message of this chapter is that the process of adapting begins when individuals can envision a future self they want to work toward and take tangible actions to bring that self closer to reality.


Chapter Lessons

  • Identify the hoped-for, feared, and expected selves shaping your response to change.
  • Seek examples of moral courage or resilience that expand your sense of what is possible.
  • Break large identity shifts into smaller, specific goals you can pursue consistently.
  • Build community with people who can reinforce a more hopeful version of who you are becoming.


Reflection Questions

  • When has a major disruption made your future feel smaller or more fixed than it really was?
  • What person, story, or community has helped you imagine a better version of yourself during a period of uncertainty or loss?
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 34 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs