The Psychopath Test: A Journey Through the Madness Industry

Jon Ronson

67 pages 2-hour read

Jon Ronson

The Psychopath Test: A Journey Through the Madness Industry

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2011

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 5-6Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of graphic violence, sexual violence, rape, mental illness, and death.

Chapter 5 Summary: “Toto”

Ronson furthers his investigations by interviewing other allegedly psychopathic subjects and trying the Hare checklist for himself. In mid-May, Ronson arrived at Coxsackie Correctional Facility in upstate New York to visit Emmanuel Constant, founder and former head of a Haitian death squad known as FRAPH. The prison appears forbidding and disorganized, with unclear procedures. Ronson enters a lobby where guards mock him, but their tones shift when he mentions Constant—who they acknowledge as a mass murderer who allegedly dined with Bill Clinton.


Ronson recalls the first time he met Constant in 1997, in Queens, New York, where he was living with his mother. Constant, dressed impeccably in a pale suit, stood in stark contrast to his humble surroundings. Ronson explains Constant’s history: In the early 1990s, he led the paramilitary death squad FRAPH, which terrorized supporters of Haiti’s exiled president Jean-Bertrand Aristide. Human rights organizations documented horrific atrocities, including massacres at Cité Soleil and Raboteau, systematic torture, and widespread sexual violence.


After Aristide’s 1994 restoration, Constant fled to the United States and was arrested. Facing deportation and trial for crimes against humanity, he claimed on CBS’s 60 Minutes that the CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency had funded FRAPH. US authorities subsequently released him under strict conditions: He could not speak to the media and was confined to Queens, permitted only brief weekly trips to check in with immigration authorities in Manhattan.


Despite the risk of deportation and execution, Constant agreed to Ronson’s interview request. During their 1997 meeting, well-dressed men came and went from the house mysteriously. Constant showed Ronson an apartment filled with thousands of plastic fast-food promotional figurines. He claimed Haitians adored him and would call him back to lead them. When questioned about the atrocities, Constant denied everything and performed a theatrical display of sobbing. As Ronson departed, he turned and caught Constant scrutinizing him with a cold, hostile expression that instantly transformed into warmth when their eyes met—a moment that sent fear through Ronson.


Ronson never published the interview because Constant seemed hollow and impenetrable. Years later, reflecting on the encounter in Wales, Ronson connected Constant’s behaviors to Hare’s Psychopath Checklist: his fake crying suggesting shallow affect, his grandiose claims indicating an inflated self-worth, and his denial demonstrating failure to accept responsibility. Learning Constant was imprisoned for mortgage fraud, Ronson wrote to him, and Constant agreed to meet.


When Ronson and Constant ultimately reunited in a prison visitors’ room, Constant protested his innocence regarding the mortgage fraud and complained about his disproportionately long sentence. Ronson explained the amygdala dysfunction theory and told Constant it would classify him as a psychopath. Constant denied it but agreed to discuss the topic. He revealed he was excited about Ronson’s visit because other inmates admired him for The Men Who Stare at Goats (2004).


Ronson felt guilty about his purely clinical motives when Constant mentioned the humiliating strip searches that follow visits. When Constant identified a guard he called a sadist, Ronson asked why Constant continually observed people; Constant claimed he wanted to know if people liked him because rejection hurts—an apparent vulnerability that initially convinced Ronson Constant cannot be a psychopath.


Constant’s facade cracked when he admitted his true motivation behind being liked: If people like him, he can more easily manipulate them. Ronson’s view of Constant began to change, and he asked him further questions using Hare’s checklist as a guide. Constant admitted he felt no empathy and could selectively display emotions. He dismissively recounted rape and torture allegations against him, claiming masked attackers were merely assumed to be FRAPH members. He boasted of excellent self-control, citing how he resisted punching an inmate for slurping soup.


Driving back to New York after the visit, Ronson realized he broke through Constant’s performance by using the word “weakness,” which compelled Constant to prove his hardness. He speculated Constant may have mirrored his own self-deprecating personality to gain trust. Ronson recalled Hare’s story about psychopaths observing and mimicking others’ emotions without truly feeling them.


Pulling into a Starbucks during a moment of anxiety, Ronson reviewed his notes and felt relieved to learn Constant’s family had abandoned him, reducing the likelihood of retaliation. He acknowledges this relief is somewhat callous and lacking in empathy. Having confirmed that a death-squad leader scores high on Hare’s checklist, Ronson shifts his focus to Hare’s theory about corporate psychopaths and wonders if it can be proven.

Chapter 6 Summary: “Night of the Living Dead”c

Ronson describes a visit he took to Shubuta, Mississippi, a declining town where businesses stand boarded up and abandoned. Brad, a local resident, showed him around the decaying streets and the rusted jail. Brad and his friend Libby recalled when Shubuta thrived because everyone worked at the local Sunbeam toaster plant. Brad showed Ronson the town’s movie theater, which opened, showed one film—Night of the Living Dead—and immediately closed. Brad blamed former Sunbeam CEO Al Dunlap for destroying the town by shutting down the plant.


At the vast, mostly empty Sunbeam facility, Stewart now ran a tiny lampshade business with just five employees in a space that once held 600 workers. Stewart, Bill, and Libby described a succession of troubled CEOs. Robert Buckley was fired in 1986 after maintaining a fleet of jets and spending lavishly while the company floundered. Paul Kazarian, though brilliant and committed to worker protections, was abusive; Bill told Ronson how Kazarian once screamed a sexually degrading demand at him in front of colleagues. When Ronson mentioned he’d be meeting Dunlap the next day, Stewart reacted with anger, shocked Dunlap was not imprisoned.


Ronson provides background on Dunlap, who built his reputation gleefully firing people at Scott Paper Company and wrote an autobiography celebrating his dismissals. When Sunbeam hired him in 1996, the stock price jumped from $12.50 to $18.63—the largest single-day increase in New York Stock Exchange history. When he announced eliminating half the company’s 12,000 jobs, the price soared again. Ronson compares shareholders’ devotion to Dunlap despite warning signs to Holly’s attachment to the killer Kit in the film Badlands. Dunlap’s tenure ended when the SEC investigated allegations of massive accounting fraud. In 2002, he settled lawsuits by paying $18.5 million and agreeing never again to serve as a public company officer.


Continuing his investigation into Dunlap, Ronson spoke with Dunlap’s biographer, BusinessWeek journalist John A. Byrne, who never met Dunlap but learned he enjoyed boxing, beat people up as a child, and once threw darts at his sister’s dolls.


Ronson details his visit to Dunlap’s opulent Florida mansion. He discovers the space filled with sculptures of predatory animals—stone lions, panthers, eagles, hawks, and alligators—along with gold decorations and life-sized oil paintings of Dunlap, his wife Judy, and their German shepherds. There were no pictures of his son, Troy. To Ronson, Dunlap proclaimed his respect for predators, stating everything he achieved required aggressive action. Ronson made mental notes of where Dunlap satisfied Hare’s checklist.


During their discussion of Sunbeam, Dunlap defended his view that long-term employees become mere caretakers, arguing life should be a roller coaster, not a merry-go-round. Dunlap then repeated a practiced line about having two dogs to hedge his bets against being friendless—a phrase Ronson recognized from Dunlap’s autobiography and interviews, marking it as superficial charm. Ronson would later discover the saying has been attributed to various powerful figures, including Harry Truman and Carl Icahn.


Nervously, Ronson told Dunlap that amygdala dysfunction could make someone like him a psychopath. Dunlap, Judy, and bodyguard Sean initially reacted with anger. Ronson went on to describe Hare’s work and checklist, but Dunlap dismissed Hare as unknown and went on to point out photographs of himself with famous figures like Henry Kissinger and Donald Trump. Despite this, Dunlap finally agreed to review the checklist, readily admitting to superficial charm and grandiose self-worth.


When Ronson presented him with the checklist, Dunlap reframed most of Hare’s psychopathic traits as leadership positives: Manipulative behavior is inspiring leadership, impulsivity is quick analysis, a shallow emotional range prevents nonsense feelings from interfering, and a lack of remorse allows forward progress. He then admired a painting of his dog Brit and told Ronson he cried for days when the dog died, offering this as proof he could not be a psychopath. When Ronson asked about his first wife, whom he allegedly threatened with a knife, Dunlap explained the difficulty of transitioning from military life to marriage, noting his nuclear missile duties during the Cuban Missile Crisis conflicted with family obligations—a reference to when he left his pregnant wife alone without food or money.


Per Hare’s test, Ronson then showed Dunlap a hypothetical gruesome crime-scene photograph and asked about his emotional response. Dunlap asserted he would intellectualize the scene rather than feel horror, approaching it as a puzzle about what happened and how to prevent recurrence. Over lunch, Dunlap returned to the topic of his leadership experience, telling anecdotes about firing people. Ronson realized a person who enjoys terminating employees would be invaluable to corporations. When Ronson asked about Sunbeam, Dunlap dismissed it as an inconsequential footnote in his career. He also showed no empathy for his estranged sister, Denise, whom he said resented his success, or his son, Troy, claiming Troy made negative statements to the press. Ronson notes that feeling no remorse must be liberating when only memories remain. Dunlap also told Ronson they were alike—both successful people targeted by jealous detractors—which Ronson should understand.


Ronson concludes that corporate boards in the 1990s appreciated the short-term benefits of employing a CEO who scored high on the Psychopath Checklist.


After his Dunlap interview, Ronson met Hare at Heathrow Airport and reported back. Hare discussed his new study showing 3.9% of corporate professionals score extremely high on psychopathy measures—four to five times the rate in the general population. Hare correctly guessed Dunlap’s home contained predator sculptures, claiming clinical insight. When Ronson mentioned Dunlap cried over his dog’s death, Hare dismissed this as typical psychopathic behavior: Psychopaths view dogs as possessions like cars. Hare contrasted this with his own devastating experience watching his daughter die from multiple sclerosis, saying a psychopath would simply note it as bad luck and move on. Hare also explained psychopathy through evolutionary theory as a reproductive strategy involving deception and manipulation, but Ronson noted that, counter to Hare’s checklist, Dunlap had been faithfully married for 41 years. Hare was skeptical, suggesting Dunlap could have had affairs.


Still curious to know more, Ronson widened his investigation by interviewing a wealthy, anonymous financier he calls Jack. Jack witnessed the Dunlap era at Sunbeam, opposing the job cuts but watching Wall Street celebrate the destruction of communities like Shubuta. He describes the callous enthusiasm in research reports that praised Dunlap’s actions. Jack promised to retrieve one of these reports and later sent Ronson a 1996 Goldman Sachs analysis recommending Sunbeam stock based on Dunlap’s restructuring plans. The report’s impenetrable financial jargon confused Ronson, so he consulted experts Paul J. Zak and John A. Byrne, who explained that the analysis predicted mass layoffs would drive up earnings and stock prices for years. Zak noted that investors who followed this advice were likely furious with the investment house a year later when the stock tanked.


Examining the report’s dull, technical language once more, Ronson concludes that those seeking to wield destructive power should cultivate an impenetrable image. Journalists avoid writing about dull people because it makes their prose equally tedious. He realizes that malevolence can hide behind opacity.

Chapters 5-6 Analysis

Chapters 5 and 6 shift the narrative focus from clinical definitions of psychopathy to its real-world execution, beginning with the exploration of performative vulnerability as a tool for interpersonal manipulation. Ronson details his interactions with interview subjects to offer relevant examples of how psychopathy might manifest in leadership positions—developing the theme of Incentives that Manufacture Madness. During his visit to the Coxsackie Correctional Facility, Ronson observes Emmanuel Constant using self-deprecation and apparent fragility to disarm his interviewer. Constant initially claims that when he is rejected by others, his feelings are deeply hurt, an admission that briefly convinces Ronson of the man’s underlying humanity. However, Constant swiftly shatters this illusion, explaining that his desire to be liked is entirely strategic: “If people like you, you can manipulate them to do whatever you want them to do!” (133). This confession reveals that Constant’s charm is an active, predatory mimicking of social norms rather than a genuine emotional state. By mirroring Ronson’s own anxieties, Constant weaponizes empathy against his observer. The behavior exemplifies Hare’s assertion that psychopaths study and reproduce human reactions without internalizing them. Within the text’s broader inquiry, Constant’s calculated behavior illustrates how the most dangerous individuals might camouflage themselves within the conventions of human connection, deeply complicating the task of the psychological diagnostician who relies on external social cues.


Ronson utilizes stark spatial juxtapositions to materialize the economic violence of corporate psychopathy, contrasting the decaying town of Shubuta with Al Dunlap’s opulent Florida estate. Shubuta emerges as a landscape of physical ruin, characterized by boarded-up businesses and an abandoned Sunbeam toaster plant where a fraction of the original workforce remains. Conversely, Dunlap’s mansion operates as a monument to unbridled excess, notably saturated with fierce stone sculptures of predatory animals and massive oil paintings of himself. Ronson presents the physical decay of the Mississippi town as the direct collateral damage of Dunlap’s executive tenure. By surrounding himself with stone lions, panthers, and hawks, Dunlap physicalizes his ruthless worldview, proudly identifying with apex predators who survive by consuming the weak. This sharp environmental contrast shifts the text’s exploration of malevolence from the overt criminality of Constant’s Haitian death squads to systemic, legalized cruelty. Ronson uses this spatial dichotomy to emphasize that the consequences of corporate psychopathy are as tangible as physical violence. Ultimately, the juxtaposition suggests that while society imprisons traditional psychopaths in austere facilities like Coxsackie, it rewards corporate predators with sprawling mansions, exposing a systemic hypocrisy in how destructive behavior is culturally categorized, accepted, and monetized.


Complementing this environmental embodiment of power, Ronson’s interview with Dunlap highlights the linguistic subversion inherent in corporate environments, demonstrating how clinical symptoms are routinely rebranded as executive virtues. When confronted with Hare’s assessment checklist, Dunlap does not deny his categorization; instead, he strips the diagnostic criteria of their pathology: To Dunlap “Impulsivity was ‘just another way of saying Quick Analysis.’ [...] Shallow Affect (an inability to feel a deep range of emotions) stops you from feeling ‘some nonsense emotions.’ A lack of remorse frees you up to move forward and achieve more great things” (157). Here, Dunlap reframes human empathy as an unnecessary burden that results in illogical emotional attachments. By filtering the psychological assessment through the vocabulary of business management, Dunlap neutralizes the checklist’s diagnostic authority. This rhetorical shift sanitizes his profound emotional deficits, repackaging a fundamental lack of remorse as a necessary mechanism for forward progress. Dunlap uses corporate jargon to build a narrative of ambition that entirely obscures the human cost of his decisions, while furthering Ronson’s notion that psychopathic traits are most visible in positions of economic and political power. Dunlap’s deliberate manipulation of language demonstrates how corporate structures provide a sheltering framework for destructive individuals. By adopting the specialized lexicon of leadership, corporate psychopaths effectively insulate themselves from psychological scrutiny, proving that the corporate world actively codifies psychopathic traits as essential competencies for success.


Building upon this analysis of language, Ronson identifies bureaucratic opacity as the ultimate shield for institutionalized malevolence. This concept crystallizes when an anonymous financier provides Ronson with a 1996 Goldman Sachs research report that endorsed Sunbeam’s mass layoffs. The document celebrates the destruction of Shubuta using impenetrable financial equations, which prompts Ronson to realize that “if you want to get away with wielding true, malevolent power, be boring” (168). The sheer dullness and technical density of the financial text masks the devastating human realities detailed in the previous scenes. By encoding socioeconomic devastation in acronyms and clinical market forecasts, the financial institution renders cruelty invisible and socially acceptable. Ronson argues that the report demonstrates how Wall Street systematically translated the termination of thousands of livelihoods into a celebratory metric for stock appreciation. Journalists and watchdogs, drawn to the eccentricities of conventional criminals, struggle to or actively avoid interrogating this dense bureaucratic language. Consequently, the narrative posits that the most dangerous form of madness is not the flamboyant criminality of an isolated killer or a paramilitary leader. Instead, the greatest threat emerges from the quiet, institutionalized ruthlessness endorsed by global financial systems, where catastrophic harm is enacted through tedious, impenetrable corporate paperwork.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 67 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs