When He Was Wicked

Julia Quinn

54 pages 1-hour read

Julia Quinn

When He Was Wicked

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2004

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of illness, death, pregnancy loss, and gender discrimination.

Finding Love Again After Loss

Via Francesca Bridgerton and Michael Stirling’s forbidden friends-to-lovers romance, the novel explores the possibilities of making room for a second love in the wake of losing one’s first love. When the novel opens, Francesca is so certain of her love for her husband John that she tells her sister Eloise, “I love him madly. Madly! Truly, I would die without him” (19). In the wake of John’s untimely death, Francesca indeed experiences an intense grief that leaves her nearly immobilized. Throughout the rest of the novel, Francesca must recover from her grief while questioning the possibility of loving someone else without betraying her love for and memories with John. For some time, her sorrow and guilt over her husband’s death keep her from following her heart. Although she’s attached to Michael and longs for remarriage so that she might have a baby, she’s reluctant to get involved with John’s cousin. In pushing him away, however, she risks denying herself the transformative power of this second love.


For Michael, accepting love in the wake of losing his best friend and cousin also proves difficult, as he fears that pursuing Francesca means forsaking his bond with John. When Francesca initially suggests that her and John’s baby would have needed Michael as a father, Michael’s first answer is to refuse the role entirely: “I’m not John. It wasn’t my baby, and I can’t be what you need” (56). His refusal is meant to protect both himself and Francesca, but he’s also refusing himself redemptive love with Francesca while abandoning her amid her sorrow. Four years later, she’s still in half-mourning grays and lavenders, and the convictions she formed in early widowhood have hardened into a creed: “[A] woman simply doesn’t find love like that twice in a lifetime” (65). Despite this declaration, once Michael begins to open his heart to Francesca, she finds herself falling for him. The characters gradually learn that their guilt and sorrow over losing John are preventing them from moving forward in life and love. This ultimate revelation takes place beside John’s grave when Francesca kneels at the headstone and admits to her late husband that she loves Michael despite her attempts to quash her feelings. The setting illustrates Francesca’s work to confront her loss over John and the new love she’s found with Michael simultaneously. Michael joins her there and also makes peace with and pays homage to his late cousin.


While John’s death incites the lovers’ loss, this loss also inspires their romance. The novel ultimately suggests that new love might blossom out of loss. Once Francesca and Michael receive John’s blessing, they feel more confident in their love for each other. At the same time, John’s blessing is imaginary—the lovers telling themselves that John would have been proud is their way of making peace with his absence, their love for him, and their investment in each other. Janet’s letter in the Epilogue offers a more overt blessing of Francesca and Michael’s romance, also inspired by loss: “Thank you, Michael, for letting my son love her first” (382). By expressing thanks to Michael, Janet honors John’s place in all their lives while allowing the lovers to move forward in grace and harmony. The birth of Francesca and Michael’s son, John, further underscores the notion that one love doesn’t displace another; they honor John’s place in their relationship by naming their son after him. This narrative resolution deconstructs Francesca’s earlier conviction that lightning strikes only once. She finds true love again and reclaims her life after loss, even while creating space for her late husband’s memory.

The Pressures of Fertility on Intimate Life

Set in England’s Regency era, When He Was Wicked explores the cultural stance of the time period and frames childbearing as a pressure that distorts the loving foundations of marriage. Throughout the novel, the female characters—particularly Francesca—feel marked pressure to marry so that they might conceive, raise children, and devote themselves to maternity and the home. Social pressures are so extreme that the women in the novel feel little agency over their fates and bodies. For example, within a day of John’s death, Lord Winston arrives to inform Michael that the Committee for Privileges will need a witness at the birth of Francesca’s child because “if her ladyship gives birth to a girl, and there is no one present to witness it, what is to stop her from switching the babe with a boy?” (31). This moment underscores the reality of the time period that Francesca’s body doesn’t just belong to herself but also to other people’s interests. Subsequent images of the maids inspecting Francesca’s bedsheets after she miscarries underscore this notion, as do the countless inquiries into her status and plans to remarry and have children in the years following John’s death. Her child loss demands a witness, the family demands an heir, and the season demands a bridegroom. Her society imposes expectations on her that limit her agency. At the same time, when Francesca tells Michael in Hyde Park that she wants a baby, she’s learning to decipher her own personal longings from her society’s customary demands.


Despite Francesca’s desire for her children, her interior life around fertility is shaped by self-blame, fear, and shame. Because she has had trouble conceiving in the past, she feels like she has failed—failed to satisfy others’ expectations, to make John happy, to ease her own grief, and to realize her own desires: “And the worst part of it is,” she tells Michael in the Hyde Park scene, “maybe I can’t even have children. It took me two years to conceive with John, and look how I mucked that up” (99). The verb “mucked” underscores how Francesca is treating the loss as a failure of her own womanhood. Her self-judgment intensifies her determination to conceive, inspiring her later bargain with herself: to consider Michael’s proposal only if she becomes pregnant. Her careful accounting of her menstrual cycles underscores her desperation to perform her womanhood correctly and, in turn, to pursue her desires as meticulously. Three years into her marriage to Michael, Francesca is still counting her cycles, hiding the tally marks in the back of her desk drawer so that Michael won’t see it. The hatch marks are a record of a body that has been asked to perform.


Michael’s abiding love for Francesca offers a resolution to her fertility anxiety. After her period confirms that there will be no child this time, she insists that she can’t marry him if she can’t conceive; however, Michael immediately tells her, “I don’t care if you’re barren […] I don’t care if you deliver a litter of puppies. […] All I care about […] is that you’re mine” (344). Michael asserts that his love for Francesca is unrelated to her ability to conceive; he loves her for her and not because of her ability to procreate. This sentiment subverts the customs of the era that equated a woman’s worth with her fertility. Michael thus subverts Lord Winston’s earlier view of Francesca’s body as state property. The novel thus implies that fertility ruins intimate life when it’s the substance of or sole reason for the marriage; conversely, pursuing motherhood and having children can be a way to deepen a marriage when the desire for a family originates from within, not from societal pressure.

The Gap Between Social Duty and Private Longing

The novel’s cultural, social, and historical contexts restrict the main characters’ ability to claim and express their personal experiences. Bound by the norms of their society, Francesca and Michael often find themselves performing versions of themselves that don’t align with their true identities or desires. For example, the novel initially characterizes Michael according to his public persona: “And so he laughed, and was very merry, and he continued to seduce women, trying not to notice that he tended to close his eyes when he had them in bed” (4). He’s earned this reputation as the “Merry Rake” of London, but the novel later reveals that he created this facade the night he first saw Francesca at her wedding supper and fell in love with her. He continues to uphold this persona as a way to keep anyone, including Francesca, from guessing that the most prolific seducer in town has been secretly in love with the one woman he can’t have for six years. His visible behavior is the opposite of his inner life. Over time, this social performance proves detrimental to Michael’s private longings and true self.


Francesca’s costume is quieter but equally as constraining. After John’s death, she wears grays and lavenders for years past the formal mourning period because the half-mourning palette is a kind of armor. She can hide what she really wants (remarriage and a baby) from the public eye as long as she’s still mourning her late husband. When she finally decides to come down to London early and order a new wardrobe, the decision is framed as a permission she gives herself: “It was time to wear blue. Bright, beautiful, cornflower blue” (66). She steadies herself with a private resolution: “There were a lot of things in life to be afraid of, but strangeness ought not be among them” (66). Yet this resolution proves harder to keep than to make. Within weeks, Francesca flees Scotland to escape Michael’s kiss, lies about an outbreak of spotted fever to cover her flight, and refuses to name what she feels even after she and Michael have been become sexually intimate. The blue dress signals her readiness to the season; her own behavior shows how much more internal work she must do before confidently claiming her private desires.


Francesca’s and Michael’s acceptable, public performances collapse by the novel’s climax when they acknowledge and embrace their relationship. Once they begin sharing their more vulnerable feelings with each other, they move toward claiming these same longings beyond the context of their relationship—despite how society might respond. In Chapter 21, when Francesca’s vacillating emotions begin to exhaust Michael, he boldly professes his feelings: “I love you, damn me to hell. Because I’ve always loved you. Because I loved you when you were with John, and I loved you when I was in India” (331-32). Here, Michael is taking ownership of his longings while admitting his long-time fear that this longing betrayed his social obligations. Francesca’s reconciliation of her duties and desires requires her to take similar ownership, admitting that the widow who wore lavender and the woman who wants Michael are the same person. The novel argues that such social facades serve a function, letting people survive what they can’t yet verbalize. However, as soon as the characters express their private longing, they might rewrite their public persona to better serve the truth of who they are.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence