Cows

Matthew Stokoe
60 pages2-hour read
Fiction
Novel
Adult
Published in 1998

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of graphic violence, sexual violence, rape, physical abuse, emotional abuse, animal cruelty, animal death, child abuse, pregnancy termination, self-harm, death by suicide, sexual content, and cursing.

The Illusion of the American Dream

Throughout the novel, the idealized American domestic life—the happy family, the loving spouse, the bright suburban home—is depicted as a lethal hallucination. Steven, the novel’s protagonist, has absorbed his vision of normalcy entirely from television, and Stokoe constructs the book’s central tragedy around the gap between that mediated fantasy and the degraded reality Steven actually inhabits. Through the recurring contrast between images of conventional happiness and Steven’s attempts to reproduce them, the novel argues that when the only template for happiness is a fabrication beamed through a screen, imitating its outward appearance cannot create the emotional reality it promises. Instead, Steven’s pursuit of normalcy becomes increasingly dependent upon control and violence.


From the novel’s opening pages, Steven experiences the outside world primarily through the distorting lens of television. Lying awake in the dark, he registers that the TV “showed him how the world was” (2) and “beamed their lives into his head as dreams” (2). The people he glimpses on his rare bus journeys appear to him as “gods from some golden other world” (8), their existence dense and real where his feels blurred and peripheral. He does not desire any specific relationship or any particular person; he desires the composite image of a life—a wife who strokes his cheek, a child, a Jeep, a cabin in pine-scented forests. This is longing manufactured by the images he consumes. The novel reinforces Steven’s alienation through the contrast between the vividness of the people and lives he observes and his own sense of indistinctness. His emotional vocabulary is almost entirely borrowed from programs and commercials, leaving him unable to distinguish between genuine fulfillment and the performance of fulfillment he has watched for years. In this way, Steven is fed the illusion that he is supposed to aspire to, while he lives a life of abuse, work, and isolation.


When Lucy arrives as a tenant in his building, Steven immediately see her as a component of this fantasy. He decides she will be “the mother, the lover, the hook on which to hang his plagiarized blueprint for living” (47-8). The word “plagiarized” is significant, as Steven himself recognizes that the life he is constructing is copied, not created. He coaches Lucy to watch television so she can learn how to behave correctly, explains particularly relevant scenes to her, and oversees the renovation of the flat into what he calls a “simulacrum” of the Brady Bunch and Cosby Show households. The domestic space becomes a stage set, its warmth and order maintained through sheer willpower rather than any genuine bond. Lucy, for her part, participates because the fiction offers temporary shelter from her own deterioration. Their relationship exposes the difference between possessing the visible components of the American Dream and experiencing the happiness those components supposedly guarantee. Both characters are performing a script neither of them wrote, and the performance is held together by mutual desperation.


The collapse of this construction is both psychological and physical. Lucy increasingly recognizes that external normality cannot cure internal suffering, directly challenging Steven’s belief that the correct home, partner, child, and financial security will produce happiness. Her death destroys the family Steven has attempted to manufacture, while the loss of the expected child eliminates what he had imagined as the final piece of his domestic ideal. The narration describes the fetus as “dead, deformed hope” (188), a metaphor for his dreams of building the American Dream. Meanwhile, their home—repainted, refurnished, carefully modeled on family-show houses—subsequently crumbles when a wall collapses in the rain, leaving the interior exposed to the open city. The physical destruction of the home is a metaphor for what has already been true from the beginning: The structure was never sound.


By the novel’s end, Steven abandons television and the conventional domestic life it taught him to desire, but he does not abandon his underlying need to manufacture a perfect form of belonging. Instead, he retreats underground and attempts to create another “family” among the cows, this time with himself as its absolute authority. Ultimately, the American Dream in the novel is an actively corrosive force, one that channels real suffering into a fantasy that can only be sustained through violence and that ends, inevitably, in collapse. Through Steven’s arc, the reader recognizes that the ideal of perfect happiness is an illusion, as what truly matters are the human connections that Steven is never able to truly replicate.

Cruelty and Violence as Futile Attempts Toward Agency

Throughout the novel, in a world of absolute powerlessness, extreme violence appears to offer a path to agency and selfhood. The novel subjects this proposition to sustained examination by allowing violence to provide Steven with genuine but temporary feelings of control. In this way, there is some appeal to violence, as it repeatedly gives Steven the decisiveness, confidence, and sense of potency he previously lacked. However, the problem is that none of these effects last. Through a recurring cycle of powerlessness, violence, temporary empowerment, and renewed emptiness, the narrative shows how agency founded upon domination requires continual escalation and ultimately becomes another form of dependence.


The intellectual framework for this idea is supplied by Cripps, the slaughterhouse foreman, whose speeches to Steven in the killing room amount to a grotesque philosophy of liberation. Cripps argues that most men are shackled by social conditioning and that deliberately taking a life shatters those constraints and reveals a man’s “true power.” “Killing is an act of self-realization,” he tells Steven, as “it shows a man the truth of his power” (34). His words land with force because Steven is, at that point in the narrative, genuinely powerless: he cannot stop his mother’s abuse, cannot leave the apartment he has been psychologically confined to since childhood, and cannot enter the world he watches through a television screen. Cripps offers something Steven has never possessed—a concrete method for changing himself. The slaughterhouse setting strengthens the seductive force of this philosophy by making domination routine and institutionalized. In a space where killing is ordinary labor, Cripps is able to reinterpret cruelty as personal transcendence.


Stokoe then charts the pattern of how Steven internalizes and acts on this logic, and the pattern is one of escalation without arrival. Steven’s first meaningful act of defiance against the Hagbeast—a single short punch—does produce a genuine surge of feeling. He guards the sensation carefully, knowing it is fragile. His rebellion develops into an increasingly degrading campaign that ultimately ends with his mother’s murder. However, removing the person he has blamed for his misery does not permanently change him. When his newfound confidence begins to drain, Steven recognizes almost clinically what he needs: “A death. Killing. Killing had given him the strength to start things and he needed more of it to continue” (119). He returns to the slaughterhouse and arranges to kill Cripps himself, then leads the underground herd in stampedes of violent attacks on strangers. Each transgression temporarily restores the feeling that Steven has finally become powerful, but every restoration fades. The repetition gives the novel’s violence a cyclical rather than progressive structure. Despite Steven’s belief that each act moves him closer to freedom, he continually returns to the same psychological point of need.


The Guernsey provides the clearest counterargument to Cripps’s philosophy. Early on, it argues that the slaughtermen’s altered state is not transcendence but numbness—a way of “stop[ping] yourself feeling” (77). This becomes increasingly important as Stven begins to resemble the mentor he eventually kills. Cripps teaches Steven that domination creates freedom, while Steven later carries essentially the same lesson into the underground tunnels. He teaches the cows how to seek identity and power through violence. The Guernsey eventually recognizes the repetition and warns Steven that he is becoming like Cripps, claiming, “[y]ou got Cripps inside you and he’s waking up. You’re a bad man” (176). Ironically, Steven believes that killing Cripps proves he has surpassed his mentor, when his continued dependence upon violence demonstrates how completely he has internalized Cripps’s worldview.


By the novel’s end, Steven appears to acquired nearly everything he once lacked: confidence, authority, followers, and the ability to form his will. However, the form of agency he achieves has required the destruction of the life he originally wanted. Lucy is dead, his home is destroyed, his connection to ordinary society has collapsed, and he retreats permanently into the tunnels to preside over the herd. His apparent liberation has therefore become another form of confinement. In this way, violence has not freed Steven; it has simply replaced one form of captivity with another. A selfhood dependent upon repeatedly proving power over others creates an endless need to recreate the conditions that temporarily make freedom feel possible.

Alienation Through Industrial Exploitation

Stokoe establishes a deliberate parallel between two environments that dominate Steven’s early life: the apartment where he is force-fed his mother’s rancid cooking and the meat plant where he spends his working hours feeding animal remains into a grinder. Both spaces reduce bodies to material to be controlled, processed, and consumed, while place Steven within systems whose rule she initially lacks the power to challenge. By situating Steven at the intersection of domestic brutality and industrial slaughter, Stokoe argues that alienation in this novel is not incidental but systemic, a condition reinforced by environments that repeatedly reduce living begins to their physical usefulness.


The meat plant is described from Steven’s first day in terms that emphasize the erasure of individual identity. The processing line receives cows through a hole in the wall, and by the time those animals exit the system, they have been reduced to what the narration calls “chunks of unsupported flesh” (11)—matter stripped of any quality that might connect it to the living creature it once was. Process hands work the line with mechanical detachment, while specialized machinery divides, crushes, and homogenizes the bodies moving through it. Steven’s assignment to the grinder places him at the endpoint of this process, where even the remaining distinctions between pieces of flesh disappear into uniform “pulp.” The repetitive labor becomes so rhythmic and simple that Steven loses himself within it. This mechanization encourages the worker to become as automatic as the machines themselves, performing a narrow function within a system whose larger violence becomes increasingly ordinary.


The plant’s physical and social hierarchy further underscores this alienation. Administrative workers remain separated from the direct violence of production, while process hands occupy specialized positions along the line and Cripps’s elite slaughter party performs the actual killing. Movement through this hierarchy is associated with increased proximity to violence and greater desensitization toward it. Cripps openly disdains those who remain removed from the killing and treats direct participation in slaughter as a higher form of existence, pointing them out to Steven and saying, “God, what beauty. […] They are the genesis. They create what the rest of you only work with. They know themselves, boy. They looked inside and weren’t afraid to drag out what they found” (28). Industrial exploitation develops into something psychologically corrosive, as the institution begins teaching its workers to interpret their own desensitization as superiority. Cripps represents the endpoint of this process, having turned the violence of his occupation into an ideology in which domination becomes the measure of personal worth.


Gummy serves as another variation on this corruption. His physical disfigurement and compulsive behavior reveal how thoroughly the boundaries between work, violence, sexuality, and identity have broken down within the plant. Rather than presenting slaughter as an activity workers simply perform and then leave behind, the novel repeatedly shows its logic entering their understanding of themselves and one another. Steven undergoes the same progression. He begins the job horrified by what he sees, but repeated exposure gradually changes his relationship to the violence around him. That which is initially viewed by Steven as monstrous eventually becomes familiar, and these same concepts become available as a model for behavior outside the workplace. His growing participation in the slaughterhouse culture parallels his movement from victim of violence to perpetrator.


Steven’s own alienation extends beyond the plant into the texture of his daily existence. On the bus to work, he experiences the other passengers as more solidly real than he is, their outlines sharper, the air around them “bright with the definition of their existence” as he feels himself “blurring with the sunlight” (7). This imagery conveys alienation as a loss of coherent identity: Steven experiences himself as somehow less fully present than the people around him. His employment initially seems capable of solving this problem because work offers wages and the possibility of financing the conventional life he desires. Instead, the slaughterhouse gives him another model of existence based on hierarchy, utility, and domination. Ironically, the job Steven hopes will provide him entry into ordinary society instead helps teach him the behaviors that carry him further outside it. The slaughterhouse and its logic become embedded in Steven’s understanding of power until he reproduces its hierarchy and violence within the underground society he eventually leads.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence