Wishful Drinking

Carrie Fisher

48 pages 1-hour read

Carrie Fisher

Wishful Drinking

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 2008

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Content Warning: This section of the guide references substance use, addiction, mental illness, sexual harassment, sexual content, and illness or death.

Humor as a Tool for Healing

Throughout Wishful Drinking, Carrie Fisher presents humor as a tool for survival. Early in the memoir, she establishes her life’s guiding principle: “If my life wasn’t funny it would just be true, and that is unacceptable” (17), positioning humor as a tool for healing. Humor becomes her way to move through the most painful and difficult moments of her life and emerge on the other side. She reflects: “Let's say something happens and from a certain slant, maybe it's tragic, even a little bit shocking. Then time passes and you go to the funny slant, and now that very same thing can no longer do you any harm (18). Over time, Fisher believes, the ability to laugh about something difficult changes how it feels and weakens its power. When Fisher turns a harsh memory into a joke, allows her reclaim power over her own story. Through her humor, she turns a life marked by scandal, addiction, and mental illness into a record of stubborn resilience.


Fisher opens with the story about her friend Greg’s death to model for her reader how she intends to deal with the painful events of her life throughout her memoir, encouraging the read to laugh along with her. She acknowledges the event as “tragic and shocking,” yet her humor allows her to shift it from private pain to communal laughter during her one‑woman show. She notes that in her performance, she jokes about questions like “How did you dispose of the body?” (19) and quips that he “didn’t die in the saddle” (18), when asked if she and Greg had a sexual relationship. In doing so, she uses humor as a tool to takes control of the narrative rather than letting herself be overwhelmed by grief. The moment stops feeling like a silent trauma and becomes an outrageous stage story that honors the spirit of her friendship with Greg rather than forcing her to steep in the pain of his loss.


Fisher continues this approach as she recounts her parents’ scandals, her mental health history, and her drug use to drain them of shame. The large chart she uses to chronicle the various marriages, affairs, divorces, and remarriages in her family allows her to poke fun at painful memories. The lighthearted tone she uses to explain the chart adds to the memoir’s intentional humor. For example, Fisher writes, “All right, so Eddie consoles Elizabeth with his penis, Elizabeth takes a movie in Rome—a big budget film called Cleopatra, and she meets her costar Richard Burton, so goodbye, Eddie, hello, Richard” (38). When Fisher’s daughter expresses and interest in stand-up comedy, Fisher tells her: “don’t worry, you have tons of material. Your mother is a manic-depressive drug addict, your father is gay, your grandmother tap-dances, and your grandfather shot speed!” (147). From Fisher’s perspective, hidden trauma festers, while a shared joke creates connection and facilitates healing. Comedy becomes her way to face the pain directly and turn it into something she can live with and offer to others.

The Specter of Fame Versus the Authentic Self

Fisher’s reflections on the specter of her most famous film role, Princess Leia, illustrate the ways celebrity eroded her sense of self. She offers a lengthy list of Leia merchandise produced after the film’s release to evidence the ways she feels the role turned her into an object for consumption: “George Lucas was the man who made me into a little doll […]a shampoo bottle where people could twist off my head and pour liquid out of my neck […] a soap that read, ‘Lather up with Leia and you’ll feel like a Princess yourself’ […] a watch […] a Mr. Potato Head […] a tiny little stumpy Lego thing […] a stamp [and] I’m a PEZ dispenser. True story” (87). Her memoir gives her a way to reclaim herself in a system that treated her image as a product.


Fisher unpacks the ways her fame made fans believe they had access to her, creating a sense that she wasn’t in control of her own life. She describes her myriad interactions with fans who alluded to her status as a global sexual fantasy. A fan she met in a shop once unabashedly told her he “thought about [her] every day from when [he] was twelve to when [he] was twenty‑two […] four times a day” (9‑10). Fisher recounts the exchange matter-of-factly, emphasizing how ubiquitous an experience it was for people to see her as an image rather than a person, appropriating her for their own needs. This loss of control, in part, led her to self-medicate with drugs. Fisher observes that her “only intent was to feel better—which is to say, not to feel at all” (117). She notes that overdosing on drugs was never her “intention [but] simply the amount of drugs that had become necessary for [her] to take to get where [she] wanted to go. My destination being, simply, anywhere but here […] Block out the dreadfully noisy din of not being good enough” (117). The disconnect between the specter of her famous image and its importance to a global fanbase warped her understanding of herself and her own worth.


The commentary Fisher provides on the famous songs written about her marriage allow her to recontextualize them as details of her personal life rather than public property. She quotes the song Simon wrote inspired by their honeymoon, commenting only, “So yeah, he knew me” (94). She follows it with a personal anecdote from that same honeymoon, reflecting, “We once had a fight (on our honeymoon) where I said, “Not only do I not like you, I don’t like you personally!” We tried to keep the argument going after that but we were laughing too hard” (95). This deeply personal moment casts public assumptions about her gleaned from Simon’s song lyrics in sharp relief, highlighting the constructed specter of fame in contrast with her reality.

Naming Mental Illness to Defy Stigma

Throughout the memoir, Fisher breaks down stigma around mental illness by speaking plainly about her bipolar disorder and its treatments. She blends medical definitions with humor comparisons to claim ownership of her diagnosis, her symptoms, and her attempts to treat them. Fisher presents her candor as a way to take control of her mental health struggles rather than ignore, avoid, or hide from them. She argues that living with mental illness requires resolve and deserves recognition, asserting that shame is actively detrimental to recovery.


Fisher explicitly names her condition, acknowledging it as part of her identity on her own terms. She accepts the label manic‑depression, or bipolar disorder, and jokingly refers to her shifting moods by different names. She calls her manic episodes “Rollicking Roy, the wild ride of a mood” (121) and her depressive state “Sediment Pam, who stands on the shore and sobs. (Pam stands for ‘piss and moan.’)” (121). By naming the moods, she turns an abstract diagnosis into something she can joke about, making her feel more agency in her own treatment. She pairs the list of diagnosed symptoms of bipolar disorder, like sexual promiscuity, excessive spending, and substance abuse, with a joke that the list “just sounds like a fantastic weekend in Vegas to me!” (114). Her humor softens the clinical language, allowing her to destigmatize it.


In her discussion of ECT, she uses pop cultural references to examine the stigma around such treatments. She notes the frightening image of ECT as depicted in films such as One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest: “From the seizures to the biting down on a stick to the convulsions, it looked traumatic, dangerous, and humiliating” (13). Acknowledging these negative perceptions of ECT allows Fisher to speak candidly about own choice to undergo treatment, framing it as a practical choice. When her depression made her feel like “not being alive,” the choice between “ECT or DOA” became clear (14). She even turns the treatment’s memory‑loss side effect into a joke by citing the answering machine message her friend recorded for her that asks callers for their name, number, and “a brief history as to how Carrie knows you” (14‑15). Her joking tone downplays the negative effects of ECT and presents it instead as a tool that helped her stay alive.


The Author’s Note Fisher includes at the end of her memoir reinforces the idea that shame has no place when it comes to struggles with mental illness. She writes that “living with manic depression takes a tremendous amount of balls,” comparing the experience to “a tour of duty in Afghanistan (though the bombs and bullets, in this case, come from the inside)” (159). This image frames the illness as a battle that demands stamina. She closes by writing: “At times, being bipolar can be an all-consuming challenge, requiring a lot of stamina and even more courage, so if you’re living with this illness and functioning at all, it’s something to be proud of, not ashamed of” (159), presenting survival as an achievement rather than a private flaw.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence