63 pages • 2-hour read
Saara El-ArifiA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summaries & Analyses
Reading Tools
For over two millennia, the popular image of Cleopatra VII has been shaped not by her own words but by the hostile narratives of her Roman conquerors. Historical accounts written by Romans Plutarch, Cassius Dio, and Cicero—often influenced by political propaganda—portrayed her as a decadent, manipulative, foreign seductress. The dramatization of these accounts by William Shakespeare in his play, Antony and Cleopatra (1607), cemented her legacy as a tragic figure defined by romance and ruin. El-Arifi’s novel directly confronts this long-standing literary and historical caricature, emphasizing the biased nature of her historical portrayal. The author, who holds a master’s degree in African studies specializing in Cleopatra’s myth, brings a scholarly and revisionist lens to the novel. The Author’s Note explicitly states this intention, observing that historical records were shaped by “the propaganda of the Roman Republic” and that Cleopatra’s own story remains elusive (ix).
Cleopatra joins the pantheon of feminist retellings of historical lives and classic myths that have traditionally reduced their female subjects to archetypes rather than the full personhood afforded their male counterparts. The novel sits in conversation with Lauren Groff’s Matrix (2021), which reimagines the life of poet Marie de France, “the medieval writer who became France's first female poet,” but whose life is almost entirely absent from the historical record (Westenfeld, Adrienne. “Who Was Marie de France, the Woman at the Center of Lauren Groff’s “Matrix?”” Esquire, 7 Sept. 2021). Similarly, Pauline Gedge’s Child of the Morning (1977), which tells the story of Hatshepsut, “the first woman to rule [Egypt] as Pharaoh, thirty-five centuries ago. Yet her name […] did not appear in dynastic rolls, nor is her reign celebrated on monuments” (“Child of the Morning.” paulinegedge.com). Each of these examples uses novelized accounts to provide insight into the inner lives of women that have been excluded from the historic record.
In Cleopatra, El-Arifi’s use of the first-person perspective imagines Cleopatra’s story told through her own voice, emphasizing The Use of Self-Narration to Combat Historical Erasure. Cleopatra herself announces this project in the Prologue: “You know my name, but you do not know me” (xi). The narrative allows her to reclaim her humanity from the myth, presenting her not as an archetype but as a calculating ruler, a devoted mother, and a complex woman navigating a world determined to misunderstand her. This reimagining challenges readers to reconsider a history written by the victors and to uncover the person behind the legend.
The Ptolemaic Dynasty ruled Egypt for nearly three centuries, but by the time of Cleopatra VII, it was plagued by internal decay. After Alexander the Great conquered Egypt in 332 BCE and the last of his heirs died, “his conquests were divided among his generals: The Ptolemaic dynasty begins in 305 BCE, when one of Alexander’s generals, Ptolemy, became Ptolemy I of Egypt” (Hill, Marsha. “Egypt in the Ptolemaic Period.” Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1 Oct. 2016). Ptolemy’s descendants ruled “until 30 B.C., when Roman takeover followed swiftly on the defeat of Cleopatra VII” (Hill). El-Arifi’s novel begins in 51 BCE, during this period of increasing geopolitical instability as Cleopatra inherits the throne of a weakened Ptolemaic Egypt. Vicious power struggles between siblings were common, a pattern the novel highlights when Cleopatra reflects, “Battles and assassinations. Patricide and betrayal. So few of my ancestors died peacefully” (39). This internal fragility was compounded by the explosive expansion of the Roman Republic, which was becoming the dominant Mediterranean power.
Across the centuries, Egypt’s resources had been depleted by invading foreign powers, as well as economic and environmental crises, such as droughts that resulted in low Nile floods. During Cleopatra’s rule, Egypt existed as a wealthy but vulnerable client kingdom, heavily indebted to and reliant on Rome’s favor. El-Arifi’s novel dramatizes this precarious relationship through the lens of Rome’s own civil wars. The conflict between Julius Caesar and Pompey the Great provides the historical backdrop for the novel’s early chapters, dramatizing the period in which “Pompey fled the camp for Egypt […] the Ptolemaic government, who were fearful of harbouring Pompey, cut off his head and sent it to Caesar” (Robbinson, Nathaniel. “Caesar, Pompey and the Birth of the Roman Empire.” New Histories, vol. 6, no. 1, 28 Jan. 2015). Pompey’s assassination, orchestrated by Cleopatra’s rivals to curry favor with the Caesar, lays the groundwork for his relationship with Cleopatra in El-Arifi’s novel, underscoring the idea that Roman political rivalries the fate of Egypt’s rulers were intertwined. This historical context positions Cleopatra’s reign as a constant, high-stakes negotiation between asserting Egyptian sovereignty and appeasing the overwhelming military and political might of Rome.



Unlock all 63 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.