For the Sake of Elena

Elizabeth George

61 pages 2-hour read

Elizabeth George

For the Sake of Elena

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1992

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 21-24Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of graphic violence, ableism, sexual harassment, and illness or death.

Chapter 21 Summary

After interviewing Rosalyn, Lynley and Havers sit in the Bentley outside the Cambridge police station. In a flashback, they retrace Rosalyn’s Monday morning running route through the fog. Rosalyn confirms she left Queens’ College around 6:25 a.m. and reached Crusoe’s Island no later than 6:30. On the island, they observe Ned, a boat repairman, burning leaves. Rosalyn remembers encountering a stumbling, coughing woman on the footbridge who wore a black tracksuit without college markings. The woman saw Rosalyn’s Queens’ College sweatshirt clearly. Rosalyn describes her as slender with light-colored hair pulled back but cannot recall other features. She expresses guilt, believing Georgina died in her place because she witnessed the killer.


Back in the present, Havers notes that Elena’s pregnancy was irrelevant. Lynley heads to the Weaver house, where he is met by Glyn, who speaks critically of her ex-husband’s character. She accuses Justine of the murder, citing the Ceephone call as evidence and jealousy as motives. She produces folders of sketches of Elena from Anthony’s study and a large, damaged canvas. The ruined painting is spattered with paint and slashed with a knife, but another image is just visible beneath. Glyn also provides a brass plaque engraved with Elena’s name. She confirms she recently saw Justine running in a black tracksuit.


Lynley takes the canvas to Penelope, who examines it and suggests using X-ray or infrared photography to reveal the original image. Despite her husband’s objections, Penelope accompanies Lynley and Lady Helen to the Fitzwilliam Museum. At the police station, St. James tells Havers the murder weapon was a heavy, smooth glass tool with a handgrip. When Lynley returns with photographs from the museum, they assemble them to reveal a composite portrait of Elena at various stages of her life. The final photo shows the signature: Gordon. Penelope identifies the weapon’s shape as an artist’s muller, a tool for grinding paint.

Chapter 22 Summary

Sarah lies in bed, shivering and remembering the murder. In flashback, she recalls Elena’s twice-weekly visits to her studio for portrait sittings. Elena was affectionate with Sarah’s dog, Flame, and gradually grew comfortable enough to chat and ask personal questions. Sarah remembers teaching Elena what music felt like by having her touch a speaker, then replicating instrumental sounds using tools against her skin: a palette knife for the electric harp, a brush for the flute, a glass jar for synthesized notes. The muller she would later use to kill Elena sat nearby on a shelf throughout these sessions. Sarah justifies the murder to herself as the only way to make Anthony face the truth about destroying her creation.


Havers questions how Sarah could have been at home having breakfast and on the island simultaneously. Lynley explains his theory: Sarah made an earlier trip on foot from Grantchester, killed Elena, ran home to change her blood-spattered clothes, then drove back to Cambridge to discover the body and establish an alibi. She likely wore a wig or scarf to make Elena think she was blonde like Justine. Lynley stops at Fen Causeway, where a cyclist directs them to a posted footpath leading to Grantchester through fields, approximately one and three-quarter miles. Havers times their drive to Grantchester: five minutes and 37 seconds.


Arriving in Grantchester, Lynley spots Anthony’s Citroën in Sarah’s driveway with shotgun cartridges visible inside. He sends St. James to call for armed backup, then he and Havers set off for the house on foot. A local, Norman Davies, confirms Sarah regularly walked to Cambridge across the fields and directs them to the rear footpath. At the house, Lynley pacifies Sarah’s dog and sends Havers away with the animal. He enters through the unlocked back door and approaches the studio, where he overhears Sarah and Anthony arguing. Sarah accuses Anthony of ending their affair to secure the Penford Chair, not for Elena’s sake. Anthony insists he did it for his daughter. Sarah reveals she killed Elena to balance the scales after he destroyed her creation.


Hearing Anthony chamber a round, Lynley bursts into the studio. Anthony fires, hitting Sarah in the arm. As Anthony turns the gun on himself, Lynley tackles him. The gun discharges again as the armed response unit storms in. Anthony gives up, crushing his glasses and declaring that he had to do it for Elena. Sarah is taken away by ambulance with a serious gunshot wound to her right arm. Havers shows Lynley a sketch found on Weaver: a tigress killing a unicorn. Lynley explains that this was Sarah’s confession-La Tigresse, the name given to Whistler’s mistress, represents her while the unicorn represents Elena.

Chapter 23 Summary

Anthony arrives home after nine o’clock and is met by Justine, who asks about the car and his missing glasses. He tells her the police have the Citroën. Anthony reflects on his marriage to Justine, realizing it was built on superficialities. Ironically, Justine herself had encouraged him to take Sarah’s art class. In flashback, he recalls the night Justine forced him to destroy Sarah’s painting after she discovered their affair. She pressed a kitchen knife into his hand, made him drive to Sarah’s house, and stab the canvas three times while Sarah watched. During the assault, the knife cut Sarah’s hand. Anthony realizes that in destroying the painting, he annihilated Sarah’s most profound expression of compassion and love. He recognizes this destruction as the greatest of his sins against her.


In the present, Justine accuses him of being with Sarah again and breaking his promise to end their affair. Anthony goes to the sitting room and removes his own watercolor paintings from the wall. Despite Justine’s protests, he smashes both framed paintings against the newel post, shattering the glass. He declares he has no art.


Meanwhile, Havers sits in her garden in Acton, reflecting on guilt and the bonds between parent and child. In flashback, she recalls returning home to find her mother in a soiled, catatonic state, neglected by Mrs. Gustafson. Havers calmly fired the woman, then bathed her unresponsive mother and put her to bed. Back in the present, Havers recognizes that judgment, like the decision itself, rests with her alone. She goes inside and telephones Hawthorn Lodge, the care facility in Greenford she had previously visited and speaks to Florene to arrange her mother’s admission to long-term care.

Chapter 24 Summary

At 11:30 the following morning, Lynley and Havers arrive at St. Stephen’s College to collect his belongings. Lynley reflects that Anthony will likely receive lenient treatment, as his actions will be portrayed as those of a grief-stricken father. He recalls visiting Sarah in the hospital the previous night, where a surgeon told him her arm was saved, but she may never use it again. Havers confirms she took her mother to Greenford that morning and admits she must learn to be alone. Lynley acknowledges that he, too, struggles to let go.


As they leave, they hear a trumpet playing Amazing Grace as Elena’s funeral service concludes. The procession emerges from St. Stephen’s Church, with Anthony, Glyn, and Justine following the coffin. The college porter delivers an envelope to the Master, Terence Cuff, who reads it and quietly speaks to Anthony. Word spreads through the crowd: Anthony has been awarded the University’s Penford Chair in History. Condolences shift to congratulations. Havers asks if Anthony did everything for the Chair. Lynley replies that Anthony himself will likely never know the truth, as confronting the answer would be unbearable.


As they turn into Garret Hostel Lane, Havers makes an excuse about finding a book for a colleague and quickly departs. Lynley sees Lady Helen waiting by his car with a suitcase, realizing Havers left to give them privacy. Lady Helen tells him she wants him to take her home with him. After a moment where she fears she has misjudged the situation, Lynley tells her he still wants her, and nothing has changed. She replies that she was prepared to wait just a bit longer than he had waited for her. They load the suitcases, and as she takes his hand, Lynley feels he is lost.

Chapters 21-24 Analysis

In this final section, the symbolic weight of art as a reflection of the soul provides the novel’s central metaphor for creation and destruction. Sarah’s composite portrait of Elena embodies her artistic identity and her deepest emotional expression. For Sarah, the gifted painting represents the singular way “[s]he could show [Anthony] compassion and love” (428), making Anthony’s violent defacement of it at Justine’s request the ultimate betrayal—an assault on Sarah as a person. This act of destruction is the crime that precedes the murders, establishing a cycle of violence. In response, Sarah’s murder of Elena functions as a retaliation—the destruction of Anthony’s creation to mirror the destruction of hers. When Anthony smashes his own watercolors, declaring, “I have no art” (429), it serves as a final confession of his own creative and moral bankruptcy, an acknowledgment that while he can mimic form, he lacks the soul and emotional truth that defined Sarah’s work. The act signifies his acceptance that he is a destroyer, not a creator, and that his life has been an exercise in maintaining surfaces rather than cultivating substance.


The novel’s conclusion contrasts the destructive consequences of self-preservation with the difficult but constructive process of assuming personal responsibility. The novel’s climactic reveal highlights The Influence of Guilt on Love and Care as Anthony is forced to reckon with the harm he’s caused by allowing his guilt to dictate his choices. Throughout the novel, Anthony’s actions are consistently driven by a guilt linked to self-preservation and the maintenance of his public persona. His destruction of Sarah’s painting and his ultimate confrontation with her are rooted in a desire to manage consequences and keep the pristine image of his marriage and career intact, rather than in a genuine sense of moral obligation to his family. His realization that destroying Sarah’s painting pushed her to kill his daughter pushes him to embrace violence and vengeance himself. George emphasizes the way that Anthony’s actions will be publicly framed as the justifiable rage of a “grieving father driven to violence” (416), foregrounding perception over reality just as Anthony has always done.


The novel’s resolution explores divergent forms of personal closure through the subplots of its two primary investigators. Havers’s story concludes with a decisive step toward a difficult independence. Having placed her mother in professional care, she acknowledges that she must learn to navigate a life of solitude. Her journey ends with an act of letting go, a painful but mature acceptance of necessity that frees her from an unsustainable emotional burden. In contrast, while Havers learns to be alone, Lynley is finally allowed to embrace a committed relationship with Lady Helen. Her appearance at his car with her suitcase signifies the end of their prolonged emotional distance and his quiet longing for their romantic partnership. Their reunion represents a move toward mutual vulnerability and a shared life. This structural juxtaposition avoids a singular definition of a happy ending, instead offering a nuanced perspective on growth. It suggests that resolution can mean both the courage to form new bonds and the strength to sever old ones.


The narrative uses using Anthony’s fate to deliver a powerful indictment of The Corruption of Institutional Power and the Concealment of Harm. The novel’s critique of systemic abuses of power culminates at Elena’s funeral, where the official announcement that Weaver has been awarded the prestigious Penford Chair of History transforms a scene of mourning into one of professional triumph. The University of Cambridge, as a symbol of elite institutional power, effectively sanitizes Weaver’s moral failings. The honor bestows upon him an official legitimacy that overwrites his culpability, reinforcing the public image of a “brilliant scholar, Cambridge man” (434) while erasing the private reality of his destructive narcissism. The murmurs of condolence seamlessly shift to congratulations, illustrating the ways institutional accolades can supersede personal accountability. The system protects and rewards its own, prioritizing reputation over moral integrity—a conclusion that suggests that the most significant harms are often those ignored, and even rewarded, by the very institutions that shape societal values.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 61 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs