A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summaries & Analyses
Quizzes
Reading Tools
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of emotional abuse, death, self-harm, pregnancy loss, antigay bias, and gender discrimination.
In She Who Remains, Rene Karabash dismantles the concept of honor as defined by the archaic laws of the Kanun, portraying it as a destructive patriarchal force that prioritizes abstract reputation over individual lives. The novel argues that this rigid code traps characters in inescapable cycles of violence and sacrifice, forcing them into destructive moral compromises. Within this system, personal desires are irrelevant, and every action is weighed against its impact on the family’s public standing, ultimately leading to tragedy for Bekija’s family and demonstrating that the price of honor is often life itself.
The destructive nature of the Kanun’s honor code is established when it overrides Bekija’s personal autonomy and safety. Her impending marriage to Nemanja is a business transaction valued at 20 oxen. The system leaves no room for her desires; her father, Murash, dismisses her concerns by stating, “marriage is business, love is for the feeble” (47). After her romantic encounter with Dhana, Bekija understands she is no longer “pure” and will be killed by Nemanja on her wedding night. Her subsequent decision to become a sworn virgin is thus a desperate act of self-preservation. However, this attempt to save her own life immediately stains her fiancé’s honor, plunging her family into a blood feud. Her mother’s horrified reaction, in which she claims that Bekija has destroyed their family, crystalizes the central conflict: In the world of the Kanun, an individual’s survival is secondary to the family’s reputation, and one cannot be secured without damaging the other.
Once the blood feud is initiated, the Kanun’s cruelty intensifies, forcing characters into impossible choices that pit family members against each other. The ritual of the black armband externalizes this inhumanity. Fully embracing his role as patriarch, Murash presents Bekija with the armband and demands she choose which male in her family must be condemned to death to restore Nemanja’s honor: himself or her brother, Sále. This moment is the apotheosis of the Kanun’s logic, reducing a father and son to sacrificial objects whose lives must be offered up to settle a perceived slight. The system is so absolute that it requires a daughter to condemn either her father or her brother to death, framing a horrific act as a solemn duty and revealing the deep moral corrosion at the heart of the honor code.
The Kanun’s rituals create a reality where death is valorized and violence becomes a sacred obligation. After Sále flees his death sentence, Murash accepts his fate with pride. He is described as “leaden with the pride of knowing he’s been entered into a blood feud, that he won’t die of old age or illness” (66). His impending murder is transformed into a noble end, proof of his adherence to the code. He spends his final days building a new dovecote, a final act of patriarchal duty. The cycle of violence is further cemented after his death, when the Kanun dictates that his killers, Nemanja’s family, must sit at his funeral feast. This ritual demonstrates the inescapable and deeply ingrained nature of the system, where even in grief, the performance of honor must continue, ensuring the cycles of pain and violence will endure.
She Who Remains contends that adopting a new identity under an oppressive patriarchal system is a violent act of self-erasure that leads to the protagonist to fracture her own psyche. Bekija’s transformation into Matija is less a liberating gender transition than it is a survival tactic that creates a constant internal conflict between her suppressed self and her performed persona. The novel frames this shift as a murder of an old self, a necessary sacrifice to gain the agency and freedom afforded only to men in her society. Ultimately, this constructed identity proves to be an unsustainable and deeply damaging solution, offering no lasting peace or escape from the trauma it was created to avoid.
The transformation from Bekija to Matija is explicitly depicted as a death ritual. The oath-taking ceremony involves the public and symbolic annihilation of her female self: Her long braids are cut off and left on the church floor, and her dresses are burned to ash. This is effectively an un-becoming. As the narrator, Matija’s own language reinforces this interpretation: “Bekija’s murder is the smartest thing I ever did” (18). By framing the transition as a murder, the narrative establishes that Matija’s existence is predicated on the violent death of Bekija. This self-erasure is the steep price for the privileges of masculinity in her world, which include the right to smoke, go to bars, and, most importantly, escape a marriage that would have resulted in her death.
Despite the finality of this ritual, the new identity of Matija is inherently unstable, constantly haunted by the past she is supposed to have left behind. While Matija learns to perform masculinity, she remains tethered to Bekija’s memories, desires, and unresolved traumas. This psychological split is symbolized by her secret preservation of Bekija’s blue wedding dress and white patent leather shoes, artifacts of a future that was stolen from her. These objects represent the persistent, un-killable part of Bekija that “remains.” Her identity is a constant negotiation between the man she must be and the woman she was forced to kill, creating a fractured existence where true peace is impossible.
The novel literalizes this internal fracture with the revelation of fetus in fetu. The discovery that Bekija has unknowingly carried the undeveloped body of her male twin inside her for 33 years is a physical manifestation of her psychological state. For her entire life, she has literally embodied the son her father always wanted, the male identity that society prized and that she later imposed upon herself as Matija. This biological reality externalizes her internal conflict, suggesting that her struggle was, in a sense, predetermined in the womb. The ultimate failure of this constructed identity is cemented when, after all the revelations, the narrator concludes she must kill Matija as well. This decision signals that survival through self-erasure is a temporary and tragic solution that only begets more internal violence.
In She Who Remains, the oppressive and violently heteronormative society, governed by the archaic laws of the Kanun, forces queer love into the shadows, leading to tragic misunderstandings and lifelong trauma. The novel illustrates how the relationship between Bekija and Dhana can only exist in clandestine moments, and its collision with patriarchal expectations becomes the catalyst for the catastrophe that defines their lives. Through their story, the book argues that the repression of queer desire is a destructive force that perpetuates cycles of violence, sacrifice, and grief.
The love between Bekija and Dhana is confined to liminal spaces, away from the judgmental gaze of their village. Their relationship blossoms in secret meetings at the water mill and the dairy, the only locations where their intimacy is safe. These places, associated with work and utility, become sanctuaries for a love that has no public forum. The constant threat of discovery is palpable, as the village is already whispering about them meeting “under the pretense they’re going there to read books” (85). This need for secrecy highlights a society that offers no language or space for queer love, forcing it to exist on the margins, vulnerable and isolated. Their final, fateful encounter in the dairy is both an expression of their deep connection and the event that seals their tragic fate, as it renders Bekija “impure” by the Kanun’s rigid standards.
The patriarchal order, embodied by Bekija’s father, Murash, works actively to sever their bond and enforce social conformity. In a calculated act of cruelty, Murash lies to Dhana, telling her that Bekija is happily in love with her fiancé, Nemanja, and eagerly awaiting her marriage. This lie, revealed in Dhana’s letter years later, is a deliberate weaponization of marriage as a heteronormative institution. Murash uses it to erase the legitimacy of Bekija and Dhana’s love, ensuring his daughter will fulfill her prescribed role within the patriarchal system. His actions demonstrate how the enforcement of heteronormativity is a conscious, strategic act designed to maintain power and order by destroying any relationship that challenges it.
The consequences of this repressed and severed love ripple outward, setting in motion the novel’s central tragedy. The encounter in the dairy directly forces Bekija to become a sworn virgin to escape being killed by her husband for her supposed impurity. This decision initiates the blood feud that leads to Murash’s death and her brother Sále’s exile. The trauma is then perpetuated by Sále, who, in an act of revenge against Bekija for condemning him, hides Dhana’s letter for 16 years. His bitter act ensures the lovers remain separated, locked in their individual pain. The novel thus draws a direct, causal line from the violent repression of queer love to the destruction of an entire family, illustrating how the enforcement of a rigid social code becomes a source of deep and lasting violence.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.