42 pages • 1-hour read
Belle BurdenA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of emotional abuse.
The ospreys outside Burden’s Martha’s Vineyard home become a motif for life cycles and constancy:
Each spring, [this] osprey couple returns to the same nest on our property on Martha’s Vineyard. […] In lucky years, eggs appear in the nest in May, chicks in June. In July, the juvenile ospreys learn to fly. By September, the family is gone, headed to the Caribbean or South America for the winter (3).
The birds’ predictable pattern gave her and James something to delight in together. This bird family echoed their own happy family. After James left, Burden found it difficult to witness the birds’ continued partnership. She resented the ospreys, which seemed to highlight everything she failed to sustain in her own life: Unlike James, ospreys are “monogamous. They mate for several years, often for the rest of their lives” (29). The birds continued to represent her former marriage: Every time she saw them, she had the impulse to share the experience with James.
Over time, Burden separated the birds’ constancy from her divorce and learned to find comfort in their repeated and ongoing life cycle. During divorce proceedings, Burden faced many surprises. James, once her rock, became an impulsive and destabilizing source of chaos. Amid this unrest, Burden came to rely on the ospreys for a sense of stability. She took pleasure in the tradition of tracking their seasoning movements to and from the nest, reminded that life will always go on even after heartbreak.
Burden and James’s prenuptial agreement is a symbol of the past. When Burden and James got engaged, Burden and James filed a prenup because she promised her parents that she would do so to protect her trust fund. However, against her family lawyer’s counsel, Burden amended the document according to James’s request: “[I]nstead of sharing anything earned during the marriage, only assets that had been put in joint name would be split. Anything that was in my name alone, or his name alone, would not be split” (62). Despite her misgivings, Burden agreed to James’s insistence because she believed that she could trust him. Taking advantage of this change, James then had Burden buy their two homes with her trust-fund money but put them in both of their names.
After James left Burden, she regretted the prenup, now a symbol of the different ways that James had blindsided her by blowing up their lives. James’s treatment of the agreement is a metaphor about his lack of concern about the family more generally: Rather than soothing the feelings of their children about the forthcoming divorce, James ransacked the basement searching for the paperwork and then told Burden to make him a sandwich. In court, James demanded to have the document enforced; though he eventually agreed to cede the houses to Burden, his concern for the monetary value of their properties over their sentimental meaning to Burden and the children is damning.
Burden and James named their property on Martha’s Vineyard “Meadowpath.” James discovered that this was “the Indigenous name for [the] land” during “the closing process” and erected a sign with the name on their front gate (86). The estate came to represent their idyllic family life. They spent summers and holidays here, building a community on the island. The house’s dreamy name aligned with what Burden thought she and James “had built together—home, family, security, love” (86).
Burden found it difficult to remain at Meadowpath after James left her, which she was forced to do because of the restrictions surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. The house was both a constant reminder of everything she had lost and an unfamiliar realm haunted by James’s betrayal.
After Burden and James finalized their divorce, Burden made alterations to the property that helped her recontextualize how she saw the house. Most notably, she “pounded the [Meadowpath] sign off” the gate using a hammer (210); by doing this herself, Burden directly countered James putting up the sign earlier. The renaming represented her letting go of the dreams she had for her future with James. Instead, she hung new signs: “one with [her] last name and one with the kids’ last name. It felt important to [her]—[her] renaming, the public statement of ownership” (210). Changing the name and signage for the property was Burden’s way of preserving what parts of her past she still cherished, while actively Reconstructing Life After Abandonment and Loss.



Unlock the meaning behind every key symbol & motif
See how recurring imagery, objects, and ideas shape the narrative.