The Rosie Project

Graeme Simsion

The Rosie Project

Graeme Simsion
63 pages2-hour read
Fiction
Novel
Adult
Published in 2013

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 1-4 Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of sexual content, substance use, ableism, illness, and death.

Chapter 1 Summary

The story begins with Don Tillman, a genetics professor living in Melbourne, Australia, saying he potentially found a solution to his “Wife Problem” (1). He attributes this to having to give a lecture on Asperger’s syndrome (a diagnosis that has since been merged with autism spectrum disorder) as a favor to his friend Gene Barrow. Don was annoyed by Gene’s request because it meant disrupting his very tight schedule—particularly his intention to clean his apartment. Gene, the head of the university’s psychology department, is bowing out of the lecture because he has an opportunity to have sex with a visiting Chilean professor. Though he is married, Gene claims he is conducting research on sexual attraction by having sex with women from as many different countries as possible.


Don considers his friendship with Gene and Claudia, the latter being a clinical psychologist, noting that they are the only two he has. The couple has tried to help him with the Wife Problem in the past, but their strategy relies on traditional tactics, which Don had given up on because despite his advantages—intelligence, height, physical fitness, and a prestigious, well-paid job—there seemed to be something about him to which women were not attracted. 


Don flashes back to a date he went on with Elizabeth, one of Claudia’s friends. They meet at a Thai restaurant, and though Don finds their dinner mostly successful, things go south once the question of dessert arose. First, Elizabeth declines a dessert menu because she does not eat “Asian desserts” (3), which Don finds odd because it is a generalization with no evidence. He suggests getting ice cream at a shop across the street instead, and Elizabeth agrees so long as she can get apricot ice cream. When they arrive, they discover that the shop is out of apricot ice cream, and Elizabeth refuses to get another flavor. To solve the problem, Don orders small scoops of mango and peach, saying they would be indistinguishable from apricot because of the cold’s effect on her taste buds. However, when he turns to hand Elizabeth the ice cream, she is gone. Afterward, Claudia chides him for being so insistent on his flavor experience. While Don agrees, he does not understand why noticing the subtle clues of Elizabeth’s disinterest in other ice cream flavors would make him a better candidate as a romantic partner. Thus, he decides to give up on the idea of finding his future wife through dating.


The narrative returns to the present, specifically the night of the lecture. Don is prepared thanks to “two lunchtimes” of research into autism spectrum disorders like Asperger’s. He concludes that Asperger’s and other disorders on the spectrum are simply a natural variation of brain functionality and that medical treatment is unnecessary. He attributes the latter to people’s insistence on adhering to “constructed social norms” (5), something that autism spectrums disorders make difficult for people who exist on the spectrum.


Don arrives at the lecture location three minutes before its scheduled 7:00 pm start, when he planned so he had time to set up beforehand. Standing outside the classroom are 25 adults, including the woman who organized the lecture, Julie. Don is off put by her lax rules around promptness; she tells him that she did not expect the lecture to begin until 7:15 pm. As he prepares, Don notes there are 19 more people in attendance—19 children who are presumably on the spectrum. During small talk with Julie, Don surmises she has no idea Gene is going on a date instead of giving this lecture. Because of these distractions, the lecture begins 18 minutes off schedule, leading Don to “speak forty-three percent faster” so he can finish on time (8).

Chapter 2 Summary

Nine minutes into the lecture, Julie interrupts Don to ask him to simplify his points, as the audience has a much less technical understanding of the topic. Don adheres to his prepared presentation, confident that at least a handful of attendees could follow his logic. As he discusses the genetic and environmental factors that contribute to disorders like Asperger’s, Julie interrupts again to state that Asperger’s is natural and therefore no one’s fault. Shocked by the implication that people could have a negative perception of the disorder, Don highlights advantages to the way a person with Asperger’s thinks, including “organization, focus, and rational detachment” (10). When a mother questions whether that means children with this disorder lack emotion, Don offers a scenario of what to do with a crying baby if you are hiding from violent enemies in a basement and have a gun on hand. While the children offer a slew of solutions, the parents say nothing or try to silence their children. Don uses this as proof that being too focused on emotions can lead to poor results. The children, whom Don refers to as “aspies” (12), feel validated and begin chanting, and Don is confused by the parents’ attempts to calm their children. He chalks it up to their favoring social conventions over their children’s self-expression.


The lecture ends early, which pleases Don. As he packs, Julie tells him that educators often avoid the term aspies because it implies the disorder is a good thing, believing that the behaviors exhibited by children with autism will lead to interpersonal challenges if not addressed. Still, she appreciates that he gave the children and their parents hope that they can have life successes despite having Asperger’s—he specifically mentioned a Danish technology company that intentionally hired “aspies.” Julie invites Don out for a drink, touching his arm, but he declines because he wants to use the unexpected extra time to return to his schedule.


Don thinks about the two friends he had before meeting Gene and Claudia: his older sister, an unmarried math teacher who died of an unspecified illness due to “gross and inexcusable medical incompetence” (14), and his elderly neighbor, Daphne. Don had developed a close relationship with Daphne, whose husband was in a care facility because he had dementia. One of Daphne’s most intriguing qualities was the fact that she believed Don would make a good husband and that it would not be impossible for him to find a match. While this is logically sound, Don knows he has a small chance of succeeding in this way. Eventually, Daphne developed dementia as well, and Don stopped visiting her.


Two days after the lecture, Julie asks Don if he would like to go to dinner under the guise that she would like to hear more about the Danish company he mentioned. Don asks what she would like to know, as he intends to research the answer, and she says she is interested in how the company determines how applicants have Asperger’s. Don hypothesizes that it uses a questionnaire as a candidate filter, which gives him the idea for a solution to the Wife Problem. Instead of further failed attempts at dating, Don will develop a questionnaire that will help him weed out incompatible women until he can find the ideal partner; he calls this the Wife Project.

Chapter 3 Summary

In his excitement to get the Wife Project started, Don makes several attempts to track down Gene to discuss it. During one attempt, he interrupts a lecture Gene is giving, which upsets the dean because there were potential investors in attendance. Don overhears an argument between Gene and a woman who had attended the lecture, and then a conversation where Gene invites another woman out to coffee that night. In another attempt to talk, Don arrives at Gene and Claudia’s house at 7:30 am. Before he can bring up his new project, Claudia asks Don if the symptoms of Asperger’s discussed at the lecture remind him of anyone, and Don says he instantly thought of Laszlo Hevesi, a professor in the physics department. Because of how distracted his friends are as they prepare their children Eugenie and Carl for school, Don arranges to come for dinner on Saturday night. 


The next day, Don meets with the dean to discuss the academic dishonesty of one of Don’s graduate students, Kevin Yu. Don has caught Kevin plagiarizing his assignments for a second time, and he wants the student to be expelled. The dean explains the case is not so clear-cut, as an initial instance of plagiarism (which Don did not know about) was a misunderstanding. Since English is not his first language, Kevin uses a tutor to assist him with his papers; his tutor had previously taken Don’s class, which is why Don noticed that Kevin’s paper contained a sentence the tutor had written in an old assignment. The dean points out that no other teacher would notice this, as they do not possess Don’s vigilant attention to detail, and encourages Don to find an alternative solution to the problem because Kevin is in his final semester. Don is left angry and confused because the Dean seems more preoccupied with perception and image than with upholding academic standards. Based on this, Don decides his questionnaire will ruthlessly eliminate any women who care about keeping up appearances.

Chapter 4 Summary

At dinner on Saturday, Don shares a draft of his questionnaire, which is 16 double-sided pages, with Claudia and Gene. They review the questions, and both encourage him to broaden his requirements because he is being too picky. Gene even points out that some of the questions are ones Don himself would fail. Don agrees to make some amendments, as he appreciate their feedback on important nuance in word choice. He tells them that his plan is to join dating sites and provide a link to his questionnaire before engaging with any interested parties. Claudia and Gene convince him that he should also make use of traditional dating because it will help him improve his social skills. So, he joins a face-to-face dinner date service and is set up on a date with three other men and four women. 


During the group date, Don efficiently eliminates all four women present, despite the fact that he likes one of them—Olivia—and easily carries on an interesting conversation with her through the entire dinner. What knocks her out of the running is the fact that she is a vegetarian (as a result of being Hindu). On his way home, Don congratulates himself on his efficient use of the questionnaire, which saved him time and effort by eliminating all unsuitable candidates.

Chapters 1-4 Analysis

Much of the novel’s humor comes from Don misreading social cues, as well as his genuine confusion about the social mores that most of those around him take for granted. Though Don does not acknowledge it directly, it is heavily implied that Don has autism—a suspicion that is also shared by Don’s friend Claudia. All the characteristics associated with autism that Don discusses in his lecture also apply to him. He has a stringent approach to organization and focus, which involves being as efficient as possible with his time and interactions with others, introducing the theme of Intellect Versus Emotions. He also displays rational detachment and innovative thinking, evidenced by the disastrous “Apricot Ice Cream Disaster” (2) with Elizabeth and his decision to embark on the Wife Project. Finally, the biggest indicator is the fact that he feels a thorough, almost-clinical questionnaire is the best way to find a wife, completely disregarding emotional attraction and connection as factors in The Search for Love.


Because of his as-yet-undiagnosed autism, Don offers an outsider’s perspective on the complexity and difficulties of social interactions. On occasion, the discrepancies between Don’s behavior and social conventions are funny; for example, his repeated intrusions as he tries to corner Gene to discuss the Wife Project. However, the social misunderstandings can also be painful and sad to witness, as Don encounters constant problems when trying to communicate with others. While he is aware that he does not always correctly interpret other people’s communication, he fails to identify the specific instances when these mistakes happen and why. While he knows something went wrong with Elizabeth, he does not understand exactly how he is culpable or why it matters. He also cannot see that he may have cost the psychology department money when he forces Gene to end a presentation attended by potential investors. Moreover, he and the dean butt heads over how to deal with plagiarism, as she feels expelling Kevin would reflect poorly on the school while Don believes in adhering to the rules as they are written.


Additionally, Don’s obliviousness creates several instances of dramatic irony, wherein the reader is presumed to see truths about an event that he cannot. In chapter 2, he does not notice that Julie is hitting on him when she invites him to get a drink with her after the lecture or when she later asks him out to dinner. Another example is Gene’s extramarital behavior. Through Don’s anecdotes and observations, readers can ascertain that Gene is having unsanctioned affairs with multiple women, from his former cleaning lady to women associated with the university. Don has no clue because he takes all this data at face value and believes that Gene is being honest when he says this is all research.


The narrative implies a sense of loneliness that drives Don to want to find a partner, which can be partially attributed to the loss of two of his friends: his sister and his former neighbor, Daphne. These two women were the only successful relationships with someone of the opposite sex that Don had before he met Gene and Claudia. His relationship with Daphne grew out because he was fascinated by her untapped potential, so he devoted himself to teaching her about genetics. As they became closer, he began taking care of her, though he could not interpret his behavior as anything more than logical. Because of this nurturing aspect of his personality, Daphne told Don he would be a wonderful husband. Though he felt the data was not in his favor, he trusted that Daphne was more educated in that regard because of her long happy marriage. 


In fact, Don regularly demonstrates affection—first through his relationship with Daphne and then through his interactions with the children Eugenie and Carl—which is one of the ways the novel uses his characterization to challenge stereotypes about autism. Moreover, his fervid support of the children with autism shows that he is an advocate for people who do not (or cannot) follow social norms. Don is also shown to be humble because he has thoughtful insights into his own flaws and is open to his friends’ constructive criticisms. This implies that there is a chance Don will be able to loosen his strict standards and become successful in finding a partner, suggesting that his character development will revolve in part around The Power to Change.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 63 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs