52 pages • 1-hour read
Flann O'BrienA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of graphic violence and death.
The narrator remains unnamed. He is characterized initially by his obsession with de Selby. When he is preparing to return home after school, he feels certain that, “farming, even if I had to do it, would not be my life work. I knew that if my name was to be remembered, it would be remembered with de Selby’s” (10). He is both dedicated and obsessive. For example, he learns French and German to read commentators on de Selby. He acknowledges that he committed an early sin of stealing the book from his school, and then his greatest sin—killing Mathers—for de Selby.
He functions as an unreliable narrator in different ways throughout the novel. He frequently withholds information, hinting at details that are not explained until later. From the second chapter, he forgets his name and is unsure of the reality versus absurdity of his surreal experiences. He is not aware of the cyclicality of his experience in hell. At the end when he returns to the police barracks with Divney, he is surprised and frightened by what he sees. He does not realize he has done the same thing over and over again since his death 16 years earlier.
He does not undergo change throughout the novel, rendering him a static character. In spite of his experiences, he remains fixated on material possessions and wealth. In the underground eternity, he gathers material treasures and is distraught when he cannot bring them back to the surface. His most extreme displays of emotion are when he must leave behind these valuable items and when he thinks he is about to be hanged, indicating his selfishness. He experiences guilt, but is more interested in escaping the consequences of his actions than atoning for them.
In the letter quoted in the publisher’s note, Flann O’Brien described the narrator as the hero of the novel, but also as “a heel and a killer” (207). He is the protagonist of the novel, but lacks the conventional dynamism or complexity of a more typical protagonist. His lack of change is fitting in that he is already dead and experiencing a hell of repeated journeys back to the police station.
John Divney is mentioned on the first page of the novel as the narrator’s accomplice in the murder of Phillip Matthews. He is described as “a strong civil man,” although “lazy and idle-minded” (7). Divney is secretive and callous after the murder. He refuses to tell the narrator where he has hidden the money box; when they return to the farm, he quotes what he said to distract Mathers before hitting him, then lets “out a bellow of laughter which seemed to loosen up his whole body” (18). He is characterized by the narrator as dishonest; the narrator decides that Divney is likely to take his share of Mathers’s money, and that he cannot let the other man out of his sight.
Near the conclusion of the novel, Divney reveals that he murdered the narrator as well by placing a bomb in the floorboards of Mathers’s house and telling the narrator the money box was there. He experiences extreme shock and guilt when he sees the narrator, and dies of fright, joining the narrator in hell.
Mathers is a wealthy neighbor who “[h]ad spent a long life of fifty years in the cattle trade” (15). He is characterized as a rich recluse by Divney and the narrator before his murder. When the narrator meets Mathers after he has been murdered, he is surprised to like his victim. Mathers says “no” constantly, and espouses a philosophy that replying in the negative is preferable to replying in the positive, because “yes” is more likely to lead to sin. Rather than a developed character, Mathers functions primarily as a representation of the narrator’s guilt.
Martin Finnucane is a robber the narrator meets on the road between Mathers’s house and the police barracks. Finnucane is “tricky and smoked a tricky pipe and his hand was quavery. His eyes were tricky also probably from watching policemen” (45).
The narrator is initially fearful of Finnucane, and Joe views him as “a very slippery-looking customer” (45). He threatens the narrator’s life casually, and does not value his own, suggesting that life is useless because you cannot smoke or eat it and because it is “a certain death trap” (47). However, the narrator begins to like and feel an affinity for Finnucane when he realizes the latter also has a wooden leg, rendering Finnucane a double for the narrator both physically and in terms of his criminal intentions.
Finnucane is the “captain of the one-legged men in this country” (49) and offers to save the narrator if he ever needs it. When the narrator is about to be hanged, he calls for Finnucane, who attempts to come rescue him. Finnucane functions as a symbol of hope as well as an alternate self for the narrator.
Joe is the narrator’s soul, who begins speaking to him while he is in Old Mathers’s house. Joe is impressed with Mathers’s philosophy. Joe is imaginative and wryly critical of the narrator. When the narrator does not know his name and is imagining potential options, Joe provides elaborate summaries of identities like “Signor Beniamino Bari […] the eminent tenor” (43) and “Dr. Solway Garr” (44), telling the narrator that they are “only a hint of the pretensions and vanity that you inwardly permit yourself” (44). As well as being critical of the narrator, Joe is sensitive. When the narrator thinks about Joe’s imagined body as being scaly, Joe takes extreme offense and threatens to leave.
The narrator describes the sergeant as an “enormous policeman” with a large body, and straw-colored hair. The narrator notes that although each part of him looked normal if taken alone, but “they all seemed to create together […] a very disquieting impression of unnaturalness, amounting almost to what was horrible and monstrous” (56). He has a red face and “silent red mustache” (57). Despite his appearance, the narrator thinks he looks to have a “good nature, politeness, and infinite patience” (57). He initially appears to be needlessly obsessed with bicycles, returning all conversations to related topics. He is a comedic character, and his words and actions are characterized by absurdity.
However, the narrator gradually begins to experience increasing complexities in Pluck’s character. He appears more sinister when he reveals that he is the one who stole Gilhaney’s bicycle. However, this turns out to be in part a gesture of protection for the community members for whom he is responsible. He steals the bicycle to slow the progress of Gilhaney turning into a bicycle and the bicycle turning into a human.
MacCruiskeen is “heavy-fleshed,” with “black curly hair,” appearing more intelligent than the Sergeant. He speaks with a high, delicate voice. MacCruiskeen is an inventor and gifted at craftsmanship, having built the series of beautiful, increasingly miniscule boxes, spear with the invisible point, and the small musical instrument. He is later described as malicious, enjoying the thought of attacking the band of one-legged men with the “unbeholdable” paint color on his bicycle.
Mr. Gilhaney is the other civilian who spends time at the police barracks during the novel. He is there about a stolen bicycle, which it transpires the Sergeant himself has taken. He is important primarily because he is a clear representation of a human who has become like his bicycle. The Sergeant describes him as being nearly 60 years old, and 48% bicycle. He needs to continue moving forward or lean on things to avoid toppling over. He once forgets, and “made the mistake of stopping dead completely instead of keeping on the move to preserve his perpendicular balance” (116), falling into MacCruiskeen. Like the Sergeant, Gilhaney talks almost exclusively about bicycles.
The titular “third policeman,” Policeman Fox is characterized initially by Sergeant Pluck’s description of him as eccentric and seldom seen. Pluck says that Fox is “as crazy as tuppence-half-penny and as cranky as thruppence” (79). Pluck also suggests that this has been the case since an extended private conversation with MacCruiskeen, more details of which are not provided. He sleeps in the police barracks near the narrator one night, though the latter does not realize he was there. Whereas the Sergeant and MacCruiskeen sleep down in eternity to prevent aging, Fox sleeps in the barracks because “he wants to get rid of as much [life] as possible, undertone and overtime, as quickly as he can so that he can die as soon as possible” (158).
Policeman Fox does not appear until late in the novel. When he does, the narrator sees old Mathers’s head atop the policeman’s body, so his identity and hallucinatory nature is unclear. He is described as large and fat, with a red face.
De Selby does not appear in the novel, but is a persistent presence due to the narrator’s extensive study of, and fascination with, him. De Selby is described as a “physicist, ballistician, philosopher and psychologist” (172) who espoused a range of extreme theories about life and science. He was often ill and fell asleep in the middle of everyday tasks. The narrator describes de Selby consistently as a “savant” but with notable gaps in function, like an inability to tell the difference between men and women.
De Selby’s philosophies are comforting to the narrator, but do not offer practical guidance for real situations or the realities of the afterlife. The narrator notes that, “Holding that the usual processes of living were illusory, it is natural that he did not pay much attention to life’s adversities and he does not in fact offer much suggestion as to how they should be met” (95). His theories are both outlandish and of little practical use, neither of which diminish the narrator’s admiration of him. While de Selby does not appear physically in The Third Policeman, he does appear as a key on-the-page character in O’Brien’s final novel, The Dalkey Archive (1964).



Unlock analysis of every major character
Get a detailed breakdown of each character’s role, motivations, and development.