52 pages • 1-hour read
Flann O'BrienA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of graphic violence and death.
Throughout the novel, numerous characters answer questions in the negative and emphasize a preference for saying “no” rather than “yes.” Through the focus on negative answers and unanswered questions, Flann O’Brien highlights that unknowability is part of human experience. For the narrator, unanswered questions are part of his experience of the bureaucracy of hell and the consequences of the murder he committed.
Just after the narrator is killed by the bomb, he meets and speaks with old Mathers. The murdered man gives an extended description of his philosophy on saying “no” instead of “yes.” He suggests, “No is a better word than Yes” (30), because “everything you do is in response to a request or a suggestion made to you by some other party either inside you or outside. Some of these suggestions are good and praiseworthy […] But the majority of them are pretty considerable as sins go” (31). Mathers’s theory is that saying no prevents sin, compared to saying yes. This conversation is especially significant because it occurs just after the narrator’s death. The first conversation he has in the afterlife is thus about how declining prevents sin, and it is much too late for the narrator to say “no”—in his instance, to Divney’s plan to kill Mathers. He already said yes, and is experiencing the consequences of that choice.
Unanswered questions also form a significant part of the narrator’s experience of hell. Through his conversation with Mathers, then Martin Finnucane, then the policemen, the narrator continually asks questions that remain unanswered. The Sergeant explicitly describes his reluctance to answer questions: “Questions are like the knocks of beggar men, and should not be minded” (81). The prose itself is characterized by unanswered questions. Descriptions of what things are not appear more frequently than what things are. For example, when the Sergeant describes the color in the box in MacCruiskeen’s room, he says: “[I]t is not smooth and not rough, not gritty and not velvety. It would be a mistake to think it is a cold feel like steel and another mistake to think it blankety” (161). This lack of conviction about what things truly are adds to the sense that some things can never be definitively known.
Ultimately, O’Brien suggests that the narrator’s questions will never be answered and he will never be satisfied, which is part of his continual punishment. In having to wrestle with unknowability and his surreal circumstances forever, the narrator is doomed to face perpetual uncertainty and confusion.
The novel centers around bicycles. Sergeant Pluck and the other policemen talk incessantly about bicycles. Not only are bicycle-related offenses the majority of the crime the policeman deal with, bicycles are also the key aspect of the novel’s surrealism: People in the village are becoming more bicycle, and their bicycles are becoming more human. Through this theme, O’Brien raises questions over the interchange between human and machine.
The Sergeant’s discussion of how people in the village are becoming more machine-like speaks to the novel’s interest in dehumanization and the problem of boundaries between humans and machines:
People who spent most of their natural lives riding iron bicycles over the rocky roadsteads of this parish get their personalities mixed up with the personalities of their bicycle as a result of the interchanging of the atoms of each of them and you would be surprised at the number of people in these parts who nearly are half people and half bicycles (88, emphasis added).
The collapse of identity as a result of becoming overly reliant on machines suggests that people can lose their human personality if they do not clearly differentiate between the tools and technology they use and their own selves. The novel represents this problem to more literal and comedic effect through the human-bicycle hybrid phenomenon.
The novel also addresses collapsing boundaries between machines and humans by depicting a chronic lack of meaningful human connection, leading to an overly intense fixation on bicycles. Throughout the novel, the narrator lacks intimate relationships and interactions with others. His connections with other characters are usually superficial or contentious, such as his mistrust of Divney and his difficulties communicating clearly with the policemen. The most intimate moment he experiences is when he is riding the Sergeant’s bicycle. He thinks of the bicycle as a “she,” and experiences a close connection and feeling of attunement with her. This suggests a form of pseudo-intimacy, highlighting that neither the narrator’s life nor his experience of hell include real, human-to-human connection.
Finally, the blurring between human and machine is also reflected in the narrator’s experience of “eternity.” The elevator he takes demonstrates a degree of implied moral reasoning and judgement, refusing to raise the narrator back up if he enters with valuables he did not have on the way down. The elevator thus embodies the kind of humane moral reasoning the narrator lacks, reflecting back both the avaricious motive behind his crime in life and suggesting that, in this instance, a machine is demonstrating more human qualities than the novel’s human protagonist.
The Third Policeman depicts a hell full of unending, bureaucratic experience. The conclusion of the novel is repeated exactly from the narrator’s first shown discovery of the police barracks, suggesting that he has been there over and over again since his death 16 years earlier. Rather than using tropes of fire and intense suffering to depict a hellish experience, O’Brien instead uses his hell setting to explore the agony of banality and bureaucracy.
The majority of the novel’s setting and representation of hell is the village police station. O’Brien incorporates comedy and satire by emphasizing the inefficiency and bureaucracy of the policemen’s work and operations. The narrator is unable to get the policemen to talk or understand his requests, and conversations continually return instead to bicycles. The novel’s conclusion repeats Sergeant Pluck’s words to the narrator upon his earlier arrival at the station: “Is it about a bicycle?” (206). It is clear that the narrator, now joined by the newly deceased Divney, is doomed to spend eternity in conversation with the policemen, never accomplishing his goals of finding the money box and escaping the consequences of his actions.
O’Brien’s representation of a cyclical, unending hell also aligns with the novel’s Postmodern writing style. Quoted in the publisher’s note at the end of the novel, O’Brien wrote that the novel describes, “the beginning of the unfinished, the re-discovery of the familiar, the re-experience of the already suffered, the fresh-forgetting of the unremembered. Hell goes round and round” (207). As the narrator re-experiences the already suffered, the reader re-reads the already read. The text does not include indications that the narrator is aware that he is repeating the same experience over and over again. He retains hope that he will be able to escape, trapped in a maddeningly banal existence where nothing can ever truly move forward.
The policemen also experience an illusion of choice. For example, whereas Fox sleeps in the barracks to use up his life and die as soon as possible, the Sergeant says that he and MacCruiskeen “are wiser and we are not yet tired of being ourselves, we save it up” (158). Fox instead thinks that when he dies he will find “what he is after,” down a different road: The right-hand path, as opposed to the “eternity” the narrator visits, which is on the left. The persistence of hope among both the narrator and policemen reinforces the agony of their continual repetition of experience for all of eternity.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.