55 pages • 1-hour read
Robert HarrisA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summaries & Analyses
Reading Tools
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death.
Robert Harris (born 1957) worked as a political journalist at the BBC and then as political editor of The Sunday Times before turning to fiction in middle age. His breakthrough novel was Fatherland (1992), an alternate-history thriller imagining a victorious Nazi Germany in the early 1960s; the book sold widely in translation and established Harris as a writer of political situations rather than period set-pieces. With Pompeii (2003), Harris moved his fiction to the ancient Mediterranean for the first time, working from an aqueduct engineer’s vantage on the days before the eruption of Vesuvius. Imperium, published three years later, opens what became a three-volume sequence on Cicero’s life, completed over the following decade and shaped by Harris’s professional knowledge of canvassing, voting blocs, and patronage.
Harris has said in interviews that his interest in Cicero deepened while he was researching Pompeii and reading widely in late-republican history; the parallels he saw between the dying Roman Republic and the Anglo-American politics of his own period (in particular the Iraq War and the career of Tony Blair) shaped the trilogy’s preoccupations (“Drawing Parallels Between Ancient Rome and the U.S. Today.” NPR, 2006). Where many novels of ancient Rome use the Republic as a backdrop for personal drama, Harris keeps the procedures of late-republican politics in the foreground: the rules of senatorial debate; the precedents Cicero researches and exploits; the difference between an ovation and a triumph; the mechanics of bribery through “interpretes,” “sequestres,” and “divisors” (the three classes of agent who together broke an electoral payment into deniable parts); etc. The book reads as the work of a writer who has watched real politicians plan campaigns and count votes.
Imperium covers the years after the rule of Lucius Cornelius Sulla, whose rivalry with fellow general Gaius Marius ultimately led to Sulla’s rise to dictatorship. While this was a formal Roman office, it was intended for acute emergencies. Sulla, however, used the position to further a political agenda of shoring up aristocratic power. When he retired from power in 79 BCE, he left behind a constitutional settlement designed to entrench the authority of the Senate, traditionally the domain of Rome’s wealthiest and most elite families: He stripped the tribunes, officials elected to represent the commoners (or “plebians”) of most of their powers, doubled the size of the Senate, reorganized the courts to give senators a monopoly on jury duty, and proscribed his enemies en masse. The settlement held badly. By the year of Cicero’s first appearance in the novel, the rebel general Sertorius was still fighting Roman forces in Spain, the revolt of the enslaved man Spartacus would soon erupt across Italy, and the eastern Mediterranean was effectively governed by pirates operating from coastal strongholds in Cilicia and Crete. The political response, repeatedly, was the special command: A single magistrate granted unprecedented military authority for an unprecedented length of time, justified each time by a specific emergency.
General Pompey, a key player in the novel, received such a command against Sertorius in 76 BCE, against the pirates in 67 (the lex Gabinia at the center of Imperium’s second part), and against Mithradates, a king in what is now Turkey, in 66 (the lex Manilia, which Cicero supports from the platform of the rostra in his first speech there). Each grant was justified as an emergency measure; each enlarged the precedent for the next. The same period saw the joint consulship (Rome’s highest elected office) of Pompey and his fellow general Crassus in 70 BCE, the restoration of the tribunes’ powers under that consulship, the rise of the young Julius Caesar, and the agrarian agitation that would erupt fully in Caesar’s own first consulship in 59. Cicero’s election to the consulship for 63 BCE, where Imperium ends, places him at the head of a Republic whose constitutional machinery still operates but whose decisive arrangements are now made between a handful of generals and financiers. The Catilinarian conspiracy of 63, the subject of Harris’s second Cicero novel, follows directly from the bargain with the aristocrats that closes the present book. Imperium thus leaves Cicero at the peak of constitutional office, with the men who actually direct events (Pompey in the East, Caesar gathering populist support, Crassus controlling much of Roman finance) operating largely outside the magistracies he has just attained.
Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 BCE) left behind the most extensive personal archive of any figure from classical antiquity: roughly 58 surviving speeches, around 900 letters (many to and from him, others between his correspondents), and a body of philosophical and rhetorical writing (“Cicero, On the Orator: Books 1–2.” Loeb Classical Library, Harvard UP). The trial of the corrupt Sicilian governor Gaius Verres in 70 BCE survives in a seven-speech sequence known as the Verrines, of which only the first was actually delivered in court; the rest were published after Verres fled into exile, providing a vast catalog of provincial misgovernment. Imperium’s courtroom passages draw their evidence and rhythm from this material. So does the long sequence on the lex Gabinia, where Cicero’s own speech in support of Pompey’s eastern command (the Pro lege Manilia) survives intact.
Tiro himself is historical. He was Cicero’s enslaved (later freed) secretary and is credited by ancient sources with inventing the system of shorthand later known as notae Tironianae. The Greek biographer Plutarch, writing roughly a century and a half after Cicero’s death, and the Roman commentator Asconius Pedianus, working in the first century CE on the speech for Milo, both reference a multi-volume life of Cicero that Tiro composed after Cicero’s death; that biography has not survived. Because Tiro’s book is lost, Harris is free to build a narrator with privileged access to Cicero’s voice while controlling what gets told.
Harris’s brief author’s note acknowledges his principal sources in the Loeb Classical Library editions of the speeches and letters and in the standard 19th-century classical reference works. The shorthand that lets Tiro record the conference at Crassus’s house, the senaculum gossip, and the hidden dinners at Pompey’s villa is the same invention Plutarch credited to the historical Tiro and is a detail Harris uses to organize the novel’s whole claim to documentary intimacy. The double inheritance (a writer who left far more than he intended to, and an enslaved secretary who wrote what has not survived) gives Imperium its formal arrangement, in which a narrator whose limits are invented can quote from the documentary record at any moment.



Unlock all 55 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.